Effect of Single Dose Intranasal Insulin On Cognitive Function

February 12, 2013 updated by: Xiaoduo Fan, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Effect of Single Dose Intranasal Insulin on Cognitive Function in Patients With Schizophrenia

The purpose of the study is to find out how a small dose of insulin might affect memory, the ability to concentrate, and improve your daily functioning in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. Insulin is not being used to treat diabetes in this study. The investigators propose a single dose, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal insulin in 40 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder to examine insulin's effect on cognition. The specific aims include:

  1. Examine the effects of single doses of 40 IU intranasal insulin compared to placebo on cognitive functioning, including attention and memory.
  2. Examine whether single dose of intranasal insulin administration will raise serum insulin level and decrease plasma glucose level

Insulin will be delivered through an air spray pump into your nose. The investigators will be comparing one dose of insulin (40 International Units) with placebo, an inactive liquid.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Insulin signaling in the brain is associated with improved cognitive function in both animal and human studies. Intranasal administration of insulin, which is non-invasive and minimizes the risk of hypoglycemia, may represent a new intervention approach with the potential to improve cognition and real life functioning in this patient with schizophrenia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Freedom Trail Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, any subtype or schizoaffective disorder, any subtype
  • Male or female
  • Stable dose of the current antipsychotic drug for at least one month
  • Well established compliance with out-patient treatment per treating clinician's judgement.
  • Able to complete the cognitive assessment battery (must be English speaking)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Current substance abuse
  • On clozapine or olanzapine
  • Psychiatrically unstable per treating clinician's judgement.
  • Significant medical illnesses including uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, seizure disorder, severe cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonary, or thyroid diseases etc.
  • Incapable to complete the cognitive battery assessment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (1)
Subjects are given a one-time, single dose of placebo intranasal spray
Placebo
Experimental: Single-Dose Intranasal Insulin
Subjects are given a one-time, single dose of intranasal insulin
40 IU Intranasal Insulin will be administered once
Other Names:
  • Humulin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Cognitive Function- HVLT Immediate Recall Total (Number)
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed the HVLT Immediate Recall Task. For this task, participants were read aloud a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories. Participants were read the list three separate times, and after each reading were immediately asked to recall as many words from the list as they could. The number of words recalled successfully was measured before and after intranasal treatment. Values below represent posttreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Improvement in Cognitive Function- HVLT-Delayed Recall (Number)
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed the HVLT word recall task after a 20-minute delay before and after intranasal treatment. In the HVLT delayed recall task, participants were asked to recall the same list of 12 words dictated in the immediate recall task 20 minutes after the completion of the immediate recall task. Words successfully recalled after the 20-minute delay were measured. Values below represent posttreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
CPT d Score
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed a computer-based test designed to measure sustained attention (attention to a specific stimuli over a period of several minutes) before and after intranasal treatment. During this test, participants respond as quickly as possible to any consecutive presentation of identical stimuli on the computer screen. The stimuli (2, 3, and 4-digit targets) were presented with increasing cognitive load in successive blocks. Correct responses, responses made to the second of 2 identical stimuli presented in a row, were scored as hits. False alarms were also recorded. The "d prime score" is a score given to each participant on a scale of 0.0- 1.0 in which discrimination sensitivity is measured. A score of zero equates to no sensitivity, whereas a score of 1.0 equates to perfect sensitivity. Values below represent postreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Improvement in Cognitive Function- CPT Hits Rate (Proportion)
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed a computer-based test designed to measure sustained attention before and after intranasal treatment. The task is described in the previous outcome measure ("CPT d score"). Hits rate refers to each participant's ability to correctly respond to two consecutive target presentations (i.e. correct responses). Hits rate was measured as a proportion of overall attempts (0= no hits, 1.0= 100% accuracy on hits). Values below represent posttreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Improvement in Cognitive Function- CPT Reaction Time of Hits (Milliseconds)
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed a computer-based test designed to measure sustained attention before and after intranasal treatment. The task is described in detail in a previous outcome measure ("CPT d score"). Reaction time of hits refers to the average time each participant took to correctly respond to a stimuli in milliseconds. Values below represent posttreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Improvement in Cognitive Function- CPT False Alarm Rate (Proportion)
Time Frame: pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration
Subjects performed a computer-based test designed to measure sustained attention before and after intranasal treatment. The task is described in detail in a previous outcome measure ("CPT d score"). False alarm rate refers to the proportion of overall attempts that were characterized as incorrect responses (responses to two non-identical targets). Values below represent posttreatment performance minus pretreatment performance.
pretreatment= in the morning; postreatment= in the afternoon, 30 minutes after intranasal spray administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoduo Fan, MD, MPH, MS, UMass Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe