Efficacy Study of PN400 (VIMOVO) Twice Daily and Celebrex Once Daily in Patients With Osteoarthritis

January 20, 2012 updated by: POZEN

Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Efficacy of PN400 (VIMOVO) Twice Daily (Bid) and Celecoxib Once Daily (qd) in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

We will evaluate the efficacy of PN400 and an active comparator in patients that have Osteoarthritis of the knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

3-Month study in subjects 50 years and older with osteoarthritis of the knee. Assessments Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain and function and patient global assessment scales.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

614

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517
        • Pozen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male or non-pregnant female subjects50 years of age and older with a 6-month history of OA of the knee
  2. Female subjects were eligible for participation in the study if they were of non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant); or of childbearing potential, had a negative pregnancy test at Screening, and using adequate contraceptive methods.
  3. Subjects were required to have been on a stable dose of NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors or other oral analgesic therapy for at least 6 weeks and required to continue treatment for 12 weeks. Current oral analgesic therapy was withdrawn at Screening.
  4. Each subject was required to be able to understand and comply with study procedures required of a subject and was able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures being performed.
  5. Subjects were required to agree to keep physical activity at a stable level throughout the study.
  6. Subjects were required to have symptomatic OA of the knee meeting American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for clinical diagnosis of OA.
  7. Subjects were required to have an ACR functional class rating of I, II or III. In addition, subjects meet the requirements for OA flare at the Baseline/ Randomization Visit.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis or gout/pseudo-gout
  2. Subjects with fibromyalgia syndrome
  3. Acute joint trauma at the index joint within the 3 months prior to screen with active symptoms
  4. Previous (in the past 12 months) or anticipated need for surgical or invasive procedure performed on the index joint during the study
  5. Subject was currently taking or anticipated to take Coumadin®, warfarin, or lithium
  6. History of hypersensitivity to esomeprazole or to another PPI
  7. History of allergic reaction or intolerance to any NSAID (including aspirin) and/or subject had a history of NSAID-induced symptoms of asthma, rhinitis, and/or nasal polyps
  8. History of allergic reactions to sulfonamides
  9. Subjects with intra-articular or intramuscular corticosteroids or intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections within 8 weeks prior to randomization
  10. Participation in any study of an investigational treatment in the 4 weeks before Screening
  11. Presence of uncontrolled acute or chronic medical illness, e.g. morbid obesity, GI disorder, diabetes, active GI disease, chronic or acute renal or hepatic disorder, depression and/or infection, etc, that would endanger a subject if the subject were to participate in the study
  12. GI disorder (e.g., severe erosive esophagitis, Zollinger Ellison syndrome) or surgery leading to impaired drug absorption
  13. Peptic ulcer disease within 6 months prior to Screening
  14. Evidence of uncontrolled, or unstable cardio- or cerebrovascular disorder, which in the investigator's opinion would have endangered a subject if the subject were to participate in the study
  15. Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
  16. Subjects who had started physical therapy on the index joint less than 6 weeks prior to study Screening
  17. Use of any excluded concomitant medication
  18. A recent history (in the past 3 months) suggestive of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence, including overuse/abuse of narcotics for management of pain
  19. Serious blood coagulation disorder including use of systemic anti-coagulants
  20. Screening laboratory value for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal
  21. Estimated creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min
  22. Other than noted specifically, any Screening laboratory value that was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion and would have endangered a subject if the subjects were to participate in the study
  23. History of malignancy, treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, with the exception of successfully treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
  24. Previous participation in another PN 400 clinical research trial
  25. Subjects who were employees of the research facility or who were in some way under the supervision of the principal investigator for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ARM 1 PN 400 (VIMOVO)
PN400: 500 mg naproxen/20 mg esomeprazole
500 mg naproxen/20 mg esomeprazole bid
Other Names:
  • PN 400
Antacid Tablets
Active Comparator: Arm 2 (celebrex)
Celecoxib 200 mg
Antacid Tablets
200 mg celecoxib qd
Placebo Comparator: Arm 3 (placebo)
sugar pill
Antacid Tablets
sugar pill bid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Pain Questionnaire Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain questionnaire has 5 questions on pain all use visual analog scale (VAS) of 100 mm, with 0 mm being "no pain" and 100 mm being "extreme pain". The outcome measures a change in WOMAC pain at 12 weeks from baseline (in mm). WOMAC is a self-administered, patient-reported health status questionnaire designed to capture elements of pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with OA of the knee and/or hip joints. It consists of 24 questions (5 questions about pain, 2 on stiffness and 17 about physical function).
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Questionnaire Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks

WOMAC function questionnaire (VAS). The 17 questions about function all use visual analog scale (VAS) of 100 mm; 0 mm being "no pain" and 100 mm being "extreme pain". The outcome measures a change in WOMAC pain from baseline (in mm).

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered, patient-reported health status questionnaire that is designed to capture elements of pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with OA of the knee and/or hip joints. The index consists of 24 questions (5 questions about pain, 2 on stiffness and 17 about physical function).

12 weeks
Change in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 weeks
PGA questionnaire. The patient global assessment (PGA) question asks about how the subject is doing considering his/her arthritis and is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS); 0 mm (very poor) 100 mm (excellent). The outcome measures a change from baseline PGA in mm.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ)Total Interference Caused by Pain.
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7
Mean change from Baseline scores calculated for each subject through Day 7. Scale 0 through 70, where 0=no pain interference and 70=complete interference.
Baseline and Day 7
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Pain Questionnaire Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: Week 6
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain questionnaire has 5 questions on pain all use visual analog scale (VAS) of 100 mm, with 0 mm being "no pain" and 100 mm being "extreme pain". The outcome measures a change in WOMAC pain at 6 weeks from baseline (in mm). WOMAC is a self-administered, patient-reported health status questionnaire designed to capture elements of pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with OA of the knee and/or hip joints. It consists of 24 questions (5 questions about pain, 2 on stiffness and 17 about physical function).
Week 6
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Questionnaire Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: Week 6

WOMAC function questionnaire (VAS). The 17 questions about function all use visual analog scale (VAS) of 100 mm; 0 mm being "no pain" and 100 mm being "extreme pain". The outcome measures a change in WOMAC pain from baseline (in mm).

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) is a self-administered, patient-reported health status questionnaire that is designed to capture elements of pain, stiffness and physical disability in patients with OA of the knee and/or hip joints. The index consists of 24 questions (5 questions about pain, 2 on stiffness and 17 about physical function).

Week 6
Change in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Subscore From Baseline
Time Frame: Week 6
PGA questionnaire. The patient global assessment (PGA) question asks about how the subject is doing considering his/her arthritis and is measured by a visual analog scale (VAS); 0 mm (very poor) 100 mm (excellent). The outcome measures a change from baseline PGA in mm.
Week 6
Antacid Tablet Use
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Tablet pill count
12 weeks
Modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (mSODA)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in the Modified Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment (mSODA) average daily pain intensity converted total score at Week 12. The mSODA instruments consists of 6 questions about abdominal discomfort during the past 24 hours, with a converted score of 2 through 47. Lower score equals less pain.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Percent of Days With no Heartburn (Heartburn Resolution)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
During 12 weeks, daily heartburn question with ratings none, mild, moderate, or severe. Percent of days with Heartburn resolution (heartburn is none).
12 weeks
Number of Participants Reporting Pre-specified Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drug-associated Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) Symptoms
Time Frame: daily during 12 weeks
Number of participants reporting pre-specified non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug-associated (NSAID) upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms. Pre-specified NSAID-associated UGI symptoms include adverse events such as dyspepsia, abdominal pain or discomfort, nausea, vomiting.
daily during 12 weeks
The Number of Subjects Who Discontinued From the Study Due to Any Pre-specified Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drug-associated Upper Gastrointestinal Adverse Event
Time Frame: daily during 12 weeks
The number of subjects who discontinued from the study due to any pre-specified non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated upper gastrointestinal (UGI) adverse event (as classified by MedDRA). Pre-specified NSAID-associated UGI symptoms include adverse events such as dyspepsia, abdominal pain or discomfort, nausea, vomiting.
daily during 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe