Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cell CD 133 for Therapeutic Angiogenesis (PROGENITOR)

August 4, 2013 updated by: Pilar Jimenez Quevedo

Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Injection of Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cell CD 133 for Therapeutics Angiogenesis

The purpose of this study is to determine whether transendocardial injections of autologous endothelial progenitor cells CD 133 is safe and feasible in patients with refractory angina.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The PROGENITOR trial is a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter controlled trial including patients with Canadian cardiovascular society angina classification (CCS): II-IV and ischemic zones by SPECT but without any option for revascularization. Primary endpoint was to assess the safety and feasibility of transendocardial injection of selected CD133+cells. All patients were treated for 4-days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and underwent apheresis. CD133+ cells were selected with CliniMacs system and were injected transendocardially guided by the NOGA XP system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Functional class II- IV angina on maximal medical therapy
  • Myocardial Ischemia/viability demonstrated by a reversible perfusion defect by means imaging techniques
  • Patients should not be amenable to any type of revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years or >75 years.
  • Atrial fibrillation.
  • LV thrombus
  • Acute myocardial infarction in the last 3 months
  • An LV wall thickness of <8 mm at the target site for cell injection
  • A history of malignancy in the last 5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: selected CD133+cells
Transendocardial injection of selected CD133+cells
Endothelial progenitor cell CD 133
No Intervention: no injection
Boths groups were treated with G-CSF, underwent an apheresis and NOGA mapping

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, need for revascularization or , procedure-related complications (: pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, vascular complications and sustained ventricular arrhythmias).
6, 12 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months
The change in the myocardial perfusion defect at baseline versus follow-up measured by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT). Treadmill test, and clinical evaluation (CCS, nº angina episodes/month, nº nitroglycerin /month, Quality of life by seattle questionnaire)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo, MD,PhD, Hostpial Clinico San Carlos

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe