- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00703287
Specialized Physiotherapy Program for Cervical Dystonia
Randomized Trial of a Specialized Physiotherapy Program Versus Standard Physiotherapy Advice in Patients With Cervical Dystonia (Spasmodic Torticollis).
The investigators wish to establish on a small scale the effectiveness of adding the physiotherapy programme developed by Jean-Pierre Bleton to the present standard treatment for cervical dystonia with a view to undertaking a larger UK-wide trial looking at overall cost-effectiveness. Specifically, the investigators wish to establish:
- Whether this specific physiotherapy program for cervical dystonia improves patient outcomes in terms of neck position, pain, disability, and quality of life compared to simple physiotherapy advice?
- What is the minimal clinically important change in the new CDIP-58 quality of life measure for cervical dystonia from a patient's perspective that could then be used to plan a definitive trial of this technique?
- What are the economic implications of the specialized physiotherapy programme?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Scotland
-
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
- Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All the following inclusion criteria must be met:
- Any person over 16 years with primary cervical dystonia causing sufficient interference in lifestyle that they wish to consider physiotherapy treatment and who is able to give informed consent.
- An abnormal neck position (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale [TWSTR] Part 1A > 0).
- Patients receiving treatment with botulinum toxin (type A or B) injections (as most will) provided they are on a stable botulinum toxin regimen (i.e. same dose and injection pattern over the previous two injections). This includes those newly diagnosed patients who choose to have botulinum toxin injections OR patients not receiving botulinum toxin (either because of patient preference or previous lack of effect) provided they plan to remain off botulinum toxin for the one year duration of the trial. There will probably be few of these patients but we feel justified in including them because there are no other treatments on offer and because it is presently unknown whether physiotherapy requires botulinum toxin to weaken the muscles in order to have an effect. Anecdotal reports suggest that it can be effective even without botulinum toxin. However, the small numbers who are not receiving botulinum toxin will be analysed as a separate subgroup initially to check whether their response is significantly different to those receiving botulinum toxin.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- Secondary cervical dystonia (e.g. acute onset following trauma or secondary to drugs)
- A fixed cervical dystonia which may imply a psychogenic component.
- Radicular or myelopathic features where cervical manipulation may be dangerous.
- Patients known to have fused cervical vertebrae from previous x-rays
- Previous use of the Bleton technique.
- Deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia.
- Dementia.
- Unable to comply with visits for physiotherapy and assessment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: A2
Generic physiotherapy
|
Specialized physiotherapy programme developed by Jean-Pierre Bleton
Other Names:
Generic physiotherapy
|
|
Experimental: A1
Specialized Physiotherapy
|
Specialized physiotherapy programme developed by Jean-Pierre Bleton
Other Names:
Generic physiotherapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
To compare different types of physiotherapy for treating condition
Time Frame: Review at 1 month, 3 months & 12 months
|
Review at 1 month, 3 months & 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SN07NE039
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.