Combination of Strength and Sensorimotor Training

Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Combinations of Strength and Sensorimotor Training: Effects on Strength, Power and Balance

AIM:

Strengthening and sensorimotor training (e.g with the aim to improve balance) are widely used in rehabilitation. There is little knowledge about the best ways to combine strengthening and sensorimotor training. Therefore, the investigators want to evaluate two types of combinations in healthy participants.

Interventions:

  • Group A: 1.) warm-up; 2.) sensorimotor training; 3.) strength training (nine sessions in four weeks)
  • Group B: 1.) warm-up; 2.) one strengthening exercise, followed by a sensorimotor exercise, alternating (nine sessions in four weeks)

Tests (Before first training and after four weeks):

  • isokinetic test of knee extensors and flexors (60°/s; 120°/s; 180°/s; 240°/s.)
  • squat jumps and countermovement jumps
  • static balance test on an unstable underground (measured with accelerometer)
  • dynamic balance: star excursion balance test, (a) on stable ground, (b) on unstable ground. Balance tests will be performed (c) in recovered state and (d) fatigue (i.e. after a fatiguing exercise).

Hypotheses

  1. Group B (alternating sensorimotor and strength exercises) will improve more in the balance tests than Group A (sensorimotor first, strength afterwards).
  2. Group B will improve more in the countermovement jump than Group A.
  3. There will be no differences in the improvements in the strength, power and squat jump tests between the two groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Valais
      • Leukerbad, Valais, Switzerland, 3954
        • School of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Valais

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to perform strength and sensorimotor training
  • At least 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injury that does not allow training and testing
  • Illness that does not allow training and testing
  • Pregnancy
  • Pain during exercising

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: A Sensorimotor first
In each of nine sessions: first sensorimotor exercises, then strengthening exercises
nine sessions of one hour duration
EXPERIMENTAL: B Sensorimotor & strength alternated
In each of nine sessions: Strength and sensorimotor exercises alternated
nine sessions of one hour

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Dynamic Balance measured with the Star Excursion Balance Test
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in height with counter-movement jump
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks
Change in height with squat jump
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks
Change in force development (Nm) in knee extensors and knee flexors
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks
Change in Power knee extensors and knee flexors
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks
Change in Static Balance (single leg stance on unstable ground)
Time Frame: From baseline to four weeks
From baseline to four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonas Meng, cand. BSc., University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland Valais
  • Principal Investigator: Alain Amacker, cand. BSc., University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 29, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2009

Last Verified

January 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BA06-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe