- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00829166
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Participants With HER2-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer (EMILIA)
September 10, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Open-label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab MCC-DM1 vs. Capecitabine + Lapatinib in Patients With HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Prior Trastuzumab-Based Therapy
This is a Phase III, randomized, multicenter, international, 2-arm, open-label clinical trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with that of capecitabine + lapatinib in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Participants will be treated until disease progression (PD), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination.
Once disease progression is reported, all participants will be followed for survival every 3 months until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
991
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 78000
-
Sarajewo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 71000
-
-
-
-
-
Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 30150-281
-
Curitiba, Brazil, 80530-010
-
Goiania, Brazil, 74605-070
-
Itajai, Brazil, 88301-220
-
JAU, Brazil, 17210-080
-
Joao Pessoa, Brazil, 58040280
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90610-000
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil, 91350-200
-
Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90430-090
-
Porto Alegre - Rs, Brazil, 90050-170
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20560-120
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22260-020
-
Santo Andre, Brazil, 09060-870
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1323020
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 01317-000
-
-
-
-
-
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4000
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1756
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1784
-
Varna, Bulgaria, 9002
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N2
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2
-
-
British Columbia
-
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1Y 5L3
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1H5
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
-
Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, J9P 3Y1
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
-
-
Quebec
-
Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada, J4V 2H1
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1T8
-
-
-
-
-
Bogota, Colombia
-
Bogota, Colombia, 49 00
-
Monteria, Colombia
-
-
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, 2730
-
København, Denmark, 2100
-
Odense, Denmark, 5000
-
-
-
-
-
Helsinki, Finland, 00180
-
Tampere, Finland, 33520
-
Turku, Finland, 20520
-
-
-
-
-
Avignon, France, 84082
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
-
Brest, France, 29609
-
Caen, France, 14076
-
Dijon, France, 21079
-
La Roche Sur Yon, France, 85925
-
Montpellier, France, 34298
-
Paris, France, 75248
-
Saint Brieuc, France, 22015
-
Saint Herblain, France, 44805
-
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy, France, 54511
-
-
-
-
-
Aschaffenburg, Germany, 63739
-
Berlin, Germany, 10367
-
Berlin, Germany, 13125
-
Berlin, Germany, 4169
-
Bonn, Germany, 53113
-
Dortmund, Germany, 44137
-
Freiburg, Germany, 79106
-
Fuerstenwalde, Germany, 15517
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20357
-
Karlsruhe, Germany, 76135
-
Kiel, Germany, 24105
-
Offenbach, Germany, 63069
-
Stralsund, Germany, 18435
-
-
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
-
-
-
-
-
Bangalore, India, 560027
-
Gurgaon, India, 122001
-
Kolkata, India, 700 053
-
New Delhi, India, 110029
-
Pune, India, 411004
-
-
-
-
-
Aviano, Italy, 33081
-
Bologna, Italy, 40138
-
Candiolo, Italy, 10060
-
Genova, Italy, 16132
-
Meldola, Italy, 47014
-
Milano, Italy, 20133
-
Milano, Italy, 20141
-
Napoli, Italy, 80131
-
Negrar, Italy, 37024
-
Pisa, Italy, 56100
-
Reggio Emilia, Italy, 42100
-
Roma, Italy, 00168
-
Rozzano, Italy, 20089
-
Sassari, Italy, 07100
-
Terni, Italy, 05100
-
-
-
-
-
Kyunggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 411-769
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
-
-
-
-
-
Acapulco, Mexico, 39670
-
Oaxaca, Mexico, 68000
-
Toluca, Mexico, 50180
-
-
-
-
-
Newtown, New Zealand, 6021
-
Palmerston North, New Zealand, 4442
-
-
-
-
-
Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines, 1100
-
Quezon City, Luzon, Philippines, 1101
-
-
-
-
-
Bialystok, Poland, 15-027
-
Gdansk, Poland, 80-952
-
Krakow, Poland, 31-531
-
Lublin, Poland, 20-090
-
Opole, Poland, 45-060
-
Poznan, Poland, 61-866
-
Warszawa, Poland, 02-781
-
-
-
-
-
Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-035
-
Porto, Portugal, 4200-072
-
-
-
-
-
Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650036
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 121356
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
-
-
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 119074
-
Singapore, Singapore, 169610
-
-
-
-
-
Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
-
Córdoba, Spain, 14004
-
Lerida, Spain, 25198
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
-
Santander, Spain, 39008
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41013
-
Valencia, Spain, 46009
-
Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
-
-
-
-
-
Eskilstuna, Sweden, 63188
-
Gaelve, Sweden, 80187
-
Goteborg, Sweden, 40036
-
-
-
-
-
Luzern, Switzerland, 6004
-
St. Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
-
-
-
-
-
Kaohsung, Taiwan, 883
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 404
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 407
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 112
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
-
-
-
-
-
Bournemouth, United Kingdom, BH7 7DW
-
Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 2TL
-
Denbigh, United Kingdom, LL18 5UJ
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
-
London, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
-
New Castle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
-
Northwood, United Kingdom, HA6 2RN
-
Poole, United Kingdom, BH15 2JB
-
Preston, United Kingdom, PR2 9HT
-
Romford, United Kingdom, RM7 0AG
-
Sutton, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
-
Weston Super Mare, United Kingdom, BS23 4TQ
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
-
-
California
-
Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
-
Anaheim, California, United States, 92807
-
Bakersfield, California, United States, 93309
-
Baldwin Park, California, United States, 91706
-
Bellflower, California, United States, 90706
-
Duarte, California, United States, 91010
-
Fontana, California, United States, 92335
-
Hayward, California, United States, 94545
-
Irvine, California, United States, 92618
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
-
La Mesa, California, United States, 91942
-
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90025
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90057
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095-1772
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90034
-
Montebello, California, United States, 90640
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94611
-
Panorama City, California, United States, 91402
-
Riverside, California, United States, 92505
-
Roseville, California, United States, 95661
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95825
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92123
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92120
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
-
San Jose, California, United States, 95119
-
Santa Clara, California, United States, 95051
-
Santa Maria, California, United States, 93454
-
Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
-
South San Francisco, California, United States, 94080
-
Thousand Oaks, California, United States, 91360
-
Vallejo, California, United States, 94589
-
Walnut Creek, California, United States, 94596
-
Woodland Hills, California, United States, 91367
-
-
Colorado
-
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
-
-
Connecticut
-
Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06856
-
Norwich, Connecticut, United States, 06360
-
Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06902
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
-
Fernandina Beach, Florida, United States, 32034
-
Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
-
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33316
-
Hollywood, Florida, United States, 33021
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32205
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32258
-
Kissimmee, Florida, United States, 34741
-
Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33804-1057
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
-
Orange Park, Florida, United States, 32073
-
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
-
-
Georgia
-
Athens, Georgia, United States, 30607
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30341
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
-
Carrolton, Georgia, United States, 30117
-
Cartersville, Georgia, United States, 30121
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
-
Douglasville, Georgia, United States, 30134
-
Macon, Georgia, United States, 31217
-
Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
-
-
Idaho
-
Boise, Idaho, United States, 83712
-
Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
-
Nampa, Idaho, United States, 83686
-
Post Falls, Idaho, United States, 83854
-
Twin Falls, Idaho, United States, 83301
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
-
Decatur, Illinois, United States, 62526
-
Effingham, Illinois, United States, 62526
-
Joliet, Illinois, United States, 60435
-
Morris, Illinois, United States, 60450
-
Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615-7828
-
Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60076
-
Zion, Illinois, United States, 60099
-
-
Iowa
-
Bettendorf, Iowa, United States, 52722
-
-
Kansas
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214-3728
-
-
Kentucky
-
Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
-
-
Louisiana
-
Covington, Louisiana, United States, 70433
-
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States, 70503
-
Marrero, Louisiana, United States, 70072
-
Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
-
-
Maine
-
Kittery, Maine, United States, 03904
-
Wells, Maine, United States, 04090
-
York, Maine, United States, 03909
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21202
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
-
Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20850
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
-
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
-
Peabody, Massachusetts, United States, 01960
-
-
Michigan
-
Brownstown, Michigan, United States, 48183
-
Dearborn, Michigan, United States, 48126
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
-
Saint Joseph, Michigan, United States, 49085
-
West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States, 48322
-
-
Minnesota
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55414
-
Maplewood, Minnesota, United States, 55109
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
-
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55426
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101
-
St. Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55426
-
-
Missouri
-
Joplin, Missouri, United States, 64804
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
-
Saint Peters, Missouri, United States, 63110
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
-
St. Peters, Missouri, United States, 63376
-
-
Montana
-
Missoula, Montana, United States, 59802
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
-
-
Nevada
-
Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89052
-
-
New Jersey
-
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States, 08002
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
-
Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07962
-
Parsippany, New Jersey, United States, 07054
-
Voorhees, New Jersey, United States, 08043
-
-
New Mexico
-
Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, 87505
-
-
New York
-
Brockport, New York, United States, 14420
-
Canandaigua, New York, United States, 14424
-
Fresh Meadows, New York, United States, 11366
-
Geneva, New York, United States, 14456
-
Greece, New York, United States, 14626
-
Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
-
Mount Kisco, New York, United States, 10549
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14626
-
Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
-
Hickory, North Carolina, United States, 28602
-
Kinston, North Carolina, United States, 28501
-
Washington, North Carolina, United States, 27889
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43219
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43228
-
Middletown, Ohio, United States, 45042
-
Newark, Ohio, United States, 43055
-
Sandusky, Ohio, United States, 44870
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97227
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19124
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19106
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
-
-
Rhode Island
-
East Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02915
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29210
-
North Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
-
Bryan, Texas, United States, 77802
-
Cypress, Texas, United States, 77429
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
-
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79902
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77090
-
Shenandoah, Texas, United States, 77384
-
Temple, Texas, United States, 76501
-
-
Virginia
-
Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
-
-
Washington
-
Gig Harbor, Washington, United States, 98332
-
Lakewood, Washington, United States, 98499
-
Puyallup, Washington, United States, 98372
-
Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
-
Wausau, Wisconsin, United States, 54401
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- HER2 status must be prospectively, centrally tested and be HER2-positive based on central laboratory assay results
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
- Prior treatment for breast cancer in the adjuvant, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic setting must include both a taxane, alone or in combination with another agent, and trastuzumab, alone or in combination with another agent
- Documented progression (which occur during or after most recent treatment or within 6 months after completing of adjuvant therapy) of incurable, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, defined by the investigator
- Measurable and/or nonmeasurable disease; participants with central nervous system-only disease are excluded
- Cardiac ejection fraction greater than or equal to (>/=) 50 percent (%) by either echocardiogram or multi-gated acquisition scan
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- For women of childbearing potential and men with partners of childbearing potential, agreement to use a highly effective, non-hormonal form of contraception; contraception use should continue for the duration of the study treatment and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of treatment with trastuzumab emtansine
- Prior treatment with lapatinib or capecitabine
- Peripheral neuropathy of Grade >/= 3 per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0
- History of other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, Stage 1 uterine cancer, synchronous or previously diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer, or cancers with a similar curative outcome as those mentioned above
- History of receiving any anti-cancer drug/biologic or investigational treatment within 21 days prior to randomization except hormone therapy, which could be given up to 7 days prior to randomization; recovery of treatment-related toxicity consistent with other eligibility criteria
- History of radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization
- Brain metastases that are untreated, symptomatic, or require therapy to control symptoms, as well as any history of radiation, surgery, or other therapy, including steroids, to control symptoms from brain metastases within 2 months (60 days) of randomization
- History of symptomatic congestive heart failure or serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring treatment
- History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months of randomization
- Current dyspnea at rest due to complications of advanced malignancy or current requirement for continuous oxygen therapy
- Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease (for example, clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Current known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus
- Presence of conditions that could affect gastrointestinal absorption: Malabsorption syndrome, resection of the small bowel or stomach, and ulcerative colitis
- History of intolerance (such as Grade 3-4 infusion reaction) to trastuzumab
- Known hypersensitivity to 5-fluorouracil or known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
- Current treatment with sorivudine or its chemically related analogs, such as brivudine
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Trastuzumab emtansine
Participants will receive trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion over 30-90 minutes on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle until disease progression (PD) (as assessed by the investigator), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination.
|
Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion over 30-90 minutes on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Lapatinib + Capecitabine
Participants will receive lapatinib 1250 mg (five 250 mg tablets) orally once daily during each 21-day cycle + capecitabine 1000 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day treatment cycle until PD (as assessed by the investigator), unmanageable toxicity, or study termination.
Eligible participants will cross over to receive trastuzumab emtansine if second interim analysis demonstrates statistically significant overall survival benefit in favor of trastuzumab emtansine.
|
Lapatinib 1250 mg (five 250 mg tablets) orally once daily during each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day treatment cycle.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
PD was assessed by an IRC using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as target lesions (TLs) and recorded at baseline.
TLs should be selected on the basis of their size (those with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically.
A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline sum longest diameter (SLD).
All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline.
PD for TLs was defined as greater than or equal to (>/=) 20 percent (%) increase in SLD, taking as reference smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Percentage of Participants with PD by IRC or death from any cause was reported.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by an IRC (Co-primary Endpoint)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST.
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs (on the basis of their size and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements either by imaging or clinically) and recorded at baseline.
A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD.
All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline.
PD for TLs: >/= 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
PD for non-TLs: appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD by IRC or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier).
The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Second Interim Analysis
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
|
The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported.
The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
|
|
Overall Survival: Second Interim Analysis (Co-primary Endpoint)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
|
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
The results are reported from second interim analysis, which deemed to be the confirmatory.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Jul 2012 (up to 3 years, 5 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died: Final Analysis
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
|
The percentage of participants who died from any cause was reported.
The results reported are from the final analysis.
The final analysis is descriptive.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
|
|
Overall Survival: Final Analysis
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
|
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
The median duration of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
The results reported are from the final analysis.
The final analysis is descriptive.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 31 Dec 2014 (up to 5 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 1
Time Frame: Year 1
|
1 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 1 year after starting treatment.
The results reported are from the final analysis.
|
Year 1
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive at Year 2
Time Frame: Year 2
|
2 year survival was defined as the percentage of participants alive 2 years after starting treatment.
The results reported are from the final analysis.
|
Year 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by the Investigator
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
PD was assessed by the investigator using modified RECIST.
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline.
A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD.
PD for TLs was defined as >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
The percentage of participants who died or experienced PD by Investigator was reported.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to modified RECIST.
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline.
A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD.
PD for TLs was defined as >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
PD for non-TLs was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to first documented PD by Investigator or death from any cause (whichever occurred earlier).
The median duration of PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by an IRC
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST.
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total were identified as TLs and recorded at baseline.
A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated as baseline SLD.
For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as >/= 30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD.
For non-TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all non-TLs and a PR was defined as the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs.
Confirmation of response at a consecutive tumor assessment at least 4 weeks apart was required.
Participants without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders.
The percentage of participants with CR or PR by IRC was reported.
The 95% CI was computed using Blyth-Still Casella exact CI method.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Assessed by an IRC
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST.
DOR was defined as the time from first documented OR to first documented PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred earlier.
OR was defined as a CR or PR determined on 2 consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart.
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
For non-TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all non-TLs; PR was defined as the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs; and PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit as Assessed by an IRC
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Tumor response was assessed by an IRC according to modified RECIST.
Participants were considered as experienced clinical benefit if they had an OR or maintained stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months from randomization.
OR: CR or PR determined on 2 consecutive tumor assessments >/=4 weeks apart.
For TLs, CR: disappearance of all TLs; PR: >/=30% decrease in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD; PD: >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions; and SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
For non-TLs, CR: disappearance of all non-TLs; PR/SD: persistence of 1 or more non-TLs; and PD: appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Participants without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders.
The 95% CI was computed using Blyth-Still Casella exact CI method.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Treatment failure was defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including PD (per investigator review), treatment toxicity, or death from any cause.
For "Lapatinib + Capecitabine" arm, a participant was considered as treatment failure only if both drugs were discontinued.
For TLs, PD was defined as >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
For non-TLs, PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Percentage of participants with treatment failure was reported.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Time to Treatment Failure
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including PD (per investigator review), treatment toxicity, or death from any cause.
For "Lapatinib + Capecitabine" arm, a participant was considered as treatment failure only if both drugs were discontinued with treatment failure date as the later of the 2 discontinuation dates.
For TLs, PD was defined as >/=20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
For non-TLs, PD was defined as appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
The median time to treatment failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Symptom Progression
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Symptom progression was defined as the documentation of a >/= 5-point decrease from baseline in the scoring of responses as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-for participants with Breast Cancer (FACT-B) questionnaire with the Trial Outcomes Index-Physical/Functional/Breast (TOI-PFB) subscale.
The FACT-B TOI-PFB subscale contained 24 items from 3 subsections of the FACT-B questionnaire: Physical well-being, functional well-being, and additional concerns for breast cancer participants (breast cancer subscale [BCS]).
All items in the questionnaire were rated by the participant on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much").
The total score ranged from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating better perceived quality of life.
The percentage of participants with symptom progression was reported.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
|
Time to Symptom Progression
Time Frame: From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Time to symptom progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of a >/= 5-point decrease from baseline in the scoring of responses as measured by the FACT-B questionnaire with the TOI-PFB subscale.
The FACT-B TOI-PFB subscale contained 24 items from 3 subsections of the FACT-B questionnaire: Physical well-being, functional well-being, and additional concerns for breast cancer participants (BCS).
All items in the questionnaire were rated by the participant on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much").
The total score ranged from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating better perceived quality of life.
The median time to symptom progression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
|
From the date of randomization through the data cut-off date of 14 Jan 2012 (up to 2 years, 11 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):278-87. doi: 10.1038/nrc3236.
- Dieras V, Miles D, Verma S, Pegram M, Welslau M, Baselga J, Krop IE, Blackwell K, Hoersch S, Xu J, Green M, Gianni L. Trastuzumab emtansine versus capecitabine plus lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (EMILIA): a descriptive analysis of final overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):732-742. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30312-1. Epub 2017 May 16. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):e433. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):e667.
- Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, Pegram M, Oh DY, Dieras V, Guardino E, Fang L, Lu MW, Olsen S, Blackwell K; EMILIA Study Group. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1783-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124. Epub 2012 Oct 1. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2442.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2012
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
January 26, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 31, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 10, 2016
Last Verified
September 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Skin Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Breast Diseases
- Breast Neoplasms
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Trastuzumab
- Capecitabine
- Maytansine
- Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine
- Lapatinib
Other Study ID Numbers
- BO21977
- TDM4370g (Other Identifier: Genentech)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer
-
Baylor Breast Care CenterRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | HER2-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Stage III | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer InvasiveUnited States
-
Innocrin PharmaceuticalCompletedBreast Cancer | Advanced Breast Cancer | Metastatic Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | ER+ Breast Cancer | Cancer of the BreastUnited States
-
Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInflammatory Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-positive Breast CancerUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityEisai Inc.UnknownMale Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative...United States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedStage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerCanada
-
Mayo ClinicMarker Therapeutics, Inc.CompletedHER2-positive Breast Cancer | Male Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | Progesterone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer | HER2-negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedMale Breast Cancer | Stage IV Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast CancerUnited States
-
University of Central FloridaFlorida Department of HealthRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Female | Breast Cancer Diagnosis | Breast Cancer Survivors | Breast Cancer Detection | Breast Cancer AwarenessUnited States
Clinical Trials on Trastuzumab emtansine
-
Academic and Community Cancer Research UnitedNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnAnatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Prognostic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | HER2 Positive Breast Carcinoma | Metastatic Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Jenny C. Chang, MDGenentech, Inc.; The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteWithdrawnBreast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingHematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm | Advanced Lymphoma | Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Refractory Lymphoma | Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Refractory Multiple MyelomaUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheRoche Pharma AGCompletedMetastatic Breast CancerItaly, Spain, Canada, United States, Belgium, France, Germany
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IV Breast Cancer | Recurrent Breast Carcinoma | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast Cancer | HER2/Neu PositiveUnited States
-
Genentech, Inc.Completed
-
Jules Bordet InstituteHoffmann-La RocheRecruitingHER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer | HER2-positive Advanced Breast CancerBelgium
-
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminatedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedBreast CancerUnited States, Canada, Spain, France, Italy
-
Consorzio OncotechRoche Pharma AGRecruiting