Long-term Treatment Study of Certolizumab Pegol Without Coadministration of Methotrexate in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients

October 27, 2014 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Multicenter, Open-label, Long-term Safety Study of CDP870 to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CDP870 Administered Without Coadministration of Methotrexate (MTX) Over the Long Term in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Transferred From the Efficacy Confirmatory Study (Study 275-08-003)

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol when administered without coadministration of methotrexate over the long term in Japanese RA patients who transferred from Study 275-08-003 (NCT00791921), and to evaluate the effects of different dosing regimens on the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol in American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) responders who completed Study 275-08-003.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study was initiated by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and transferred to Astellas on 12/04/2012.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

208

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chubu Region, Japan
      • Chugoku Region, Japan
      • Hokkaido Region, Japan
      • Kanto Region, Japan
      • Kinki Region, Japan
      • Kyushu Region, Japan
      • Shikoku Region, Japan
      • Tohoku Region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who participated in Study 275-08-003 and meet all of the criteria described below.

    • Patients who did not reach ACR20, and prematurely discontinued Study 275-08-003 at Week 16 or completed Study 275-08-003 by Week 24.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who experienced an important protocol deviation as mentioned below during Study 275-08-003.
  • Patients who received live or attenuated vaccines during Study 275-08-003 (Except for influenza or pneumococcal vaccines).
  • Patients who were found to have tuberculosis on a chest X-ray during Study 275-08-003.
  • Patients who required treatment for the same infection at two or more different times during Study 275-08-003
  • Women who are pregnant, are lactating, of childbearing potential and wish to conceive during the study and post-study 3 months.
  • Patients whom the investigator has decided to be inappropriate for participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Certolizumab pegol 200 mg
Participants received 200 mg certolizumab pegol by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for up to 52 weeks or until approval of certolizumab pegol for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.
Subcutaneous (SC) injection
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CDP870
Experimental: Certolizumab pegol 400 mg
Participants received 400 mg certolizumab pegol by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks for up to 52 weeks or until approval of certolizumab pegol for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.
Subcutaneous (SC) injection
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CDP870

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From the first dosing of this study up to 12 weeks (84 days) after the last dosing. The dosing was allowed until launch of certolizumab pegol for RA in Japan. The maximum duration on study drug was 204 weeks.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. In this study, events that occurred between the time of informed consent and the start of study medication were included in the adverse events for Study 275-08-003. Any event existing prior to the initiation of study treatment that was aggravated after initiation of study treatment was handled as a new event. The investigator assessed the severity of each AE as follows:

Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities.

A serious adverse event is an AE that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, results in an ongoing or significant incapacity or interferes substantially with normal life functions, or causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect.

From the first dosing of this study up to 12 weeks (84 days) after the last dosing. The dosing was allowed until launch of certolizumab pegol for RA in Japan. The maximum duration on study drug was 204 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time Frame: Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)

A participant was an ACR20 responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline (before study drug administration in Study 275-08-003) were met:

  • ≥ 20% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
  • ≥ 20% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
  • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

    • Patient's assessment of arthritis pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
    • C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time Frame: Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)

A participant was an ACR50 responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline (before study drug administration in Study 275-08-003) were met:

  • ≥ 50% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
  • ≥ 50% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
  • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

    • Patient's assessment of arthritis pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
    • C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time Frame: Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)

A participant was an ACR70 responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline (before study drug administration in Study 275-08-003) were met:

  • ≥ 70% improvement in 68 tender joint count;
  • ≥ 70% improvement in 66 swollen joint count; and
  • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

    • Patient's assessment of arthritis pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI));
    • C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28
Time Frame: Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)

The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:

  • 28 tender joint count;
  • 28 swollen joint count;
  • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity.

To obtain the tender joint count and swollen joint count, 28 joints of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, and knee joints were examined.

The data before study drug administration of 275-08-003 Study was utilized for Baseline.

DAS28(ESR) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible ESR. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.

Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 24, Week 52 and at the final assessment (maximum was 208 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
Time Frame: Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 0 (of this study) and Week 100

X-ray images of extremities (posteroanterior views of both hands and dorsoplantar views of both feet) were independently assessed by at least two radiographic readers.

The degree of joint destruction was graded by assessing bone erosion in 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) in 42 joints.

The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (complete collapse of bone). The score for erosion ranges from 0 to 160 in the hands and from 0 to 120 in the feet (the maximum erosion score for a joint in the foot is 10). The JSN score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. JSN, including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The mTSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

Baseline (of Study 275-08-003), Week 0 (of this study) and Week 100

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Certolizumab pegol

3
Subscribe