Assessing the Use of Certolizumab Pegol in Adult Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on the Antibody Response When Receiving Influenza Virus and Pneumococcal Vaccines

July 4, 2018 updated by: UCB Pharma

A Phase 4, Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines in Adult Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Certolizumab Pegol or Placebo

The purpose of this trial is to assess the affect of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) treatment on antibody response to T cell-independent and T cell-dependent immunizations using pneumococcal and influenza vaccines, respectively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

224

Phase

  • Phase 4

Expanded Access

Available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Peoria, Arizona, United States
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Palm Desert, California, United States
      • Santa Maria, California, United States
      • Santa Monica, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
      • Melbourne, Florida, United States
      • Orange Park, Florida, United States
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
      • Venice, Florida, United States
      • Vero Beach, Florida, United States
      • Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States
    • Iowa
      • Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States
    • Michigan
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States
    • Mississippi
      • Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
    • Missouri
      • Florissant, Missouri, United States
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
      • Smithtown, New York, United States
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Oak Creek, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be at least 18 years old at the screening visit
  • Subjects must be able to understand the information provided to them and to give written informed consent, and be able and willing to comply with the study requirements
  • Female subjects must be either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically incapable of childbearing, or effectively practicing an acceptable method of contraception (either oral/parenteral/implantable hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier and spermicide. Abstinence only is not an acceptable method. Subjects must agree to use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the last dose of CZP. Male subjects must agree to ensure they or their female partner(s) use adequate contraception during the study and for 10 weeks after the subject receives their last dose of CZP
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) of at least 6-months duration as defined by the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria
  • Subjects must have active RA disease as defined by: ≥ 4 tender joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0; and ≥ 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) at Screening and Week 0

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis (eg., psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis)
  • Subjects who have a history of an infected joint prosthesis at any time with that prosthesis still in situ
  • Subjects must be free of defined prohibited medication and biological therapy
  • Subjects who have received any experimental nonbiological therapy, within or outside of a clinical trial in the 3 months prior to Week 0
  • Subjects who have received any experimental biological agent in the past 3 months or within 5 half-lives prior to Week 0 (whichever is longer)
  • Subjects who have received previous treatment with biological response modifier therapy for RA that resulted in a severe hypersensitivity reaction or an anaphylactic reaction.
  • Subjects with a history of pneumococcal or influenza infection in the last 3 months
  • Subjects with a history of pneumococcal vaccination in the last 5 years
  • Subjects with a history of influenza vaccination within the last 6 months
  • Female subjects who are breast-feeding, pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the trial or within 3 months following last dose of study drug
  • Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent infections (more than 3 episodes requiring antibiotics/antivirals during the preceding year), recent serious or life-threatening infection within 6 months (including herpes zoster), or any current sign or symptom that may indicate an infection
  • Subjects who have had a splenectomy
  • Subjects who have had a hypersensitivity reaction to previous pneumococcal or influenza vaccination
  • Subjects who have a known hypersensitivity to eggs and egg products or to other components of the vaccine
  • Subjects with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome
  • Subjects with a history of tuberculosis, active tuberculosis, positive chest x-ray for tuberculosis, or positive purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test (defined as induration of ≥5 mm). Subjects who are not candidates for PPD testing due to prior severe reaction to the PPD test or a history of PPD positivity must undergo an Elispot test instead for tuberculosis evaluation. Subjects testing positive via the PPD or having an indeterminate or positive Elispot test, or for which latent tuberculosis cannot be ruled out, may be enrolled in the study provided that they are treated (eg., isoniazid for 9 months) and that their treatment has been initiated at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of CZP
  • Subjects at high risk of infection (eg., presence of leg ulcers or an indwelling urinary catheter, persistent or recurrent chest infections, bedridden or wheelchair bound subjects)
  • Subjects with a history of a lymphoproliferative disorder including lymphoma or signs and symptoms suggestive of lymphoproliferative disease
  • Subjects with known concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs-Ag) or hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV-Ab)
  • Subjects with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Subjects receiving any live or attenuated vaccination within 12 weeks prior to Week 0
  • Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy (other than carcinoma of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma successfully treated more than 5 years prior to screening)
  • Subjects with Class III or Class IV congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) 1964 classification criteria
  • Subjects with a history of, or suspected, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (eg., multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis)
  • Subjects with a current or recent history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological or cerebral disease
  • Subjects with any other condition (eg., clinically significant laboratory values) which in the Investigator's judgement would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  • Subjects with a history of an adverse reaction to polyethylene glycol (PEG)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo - Two 0.9% saline subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by two sc injections of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg at Weeks 6, 8 and 10, then one sc injection of OL CZP 200 mg every two weeks from Week 12 until last drug administration (up to Week 32).
Experimental: Cimzia
Certolizumab pegol
Certolizumab pegol - Two 200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injections at Week 0, Week 2, and Week 4 followed by one sc injection of Open-Label (OL) CZP 200 mg from Week 6 until last drug administration (up to Week 32).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens (6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) at Week 6.
Time Frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens (2009/2010 Composition) at Week 6.
Time Frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects With no Previous Protective Influenza Antibody Titers at Baseline With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Pneumococcal Antibody Titers (≥1.6 µg/ml in ≥ 3 of 6 of the Pneumococcal Antigens) at Week 6.
Time Frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of All Subjects With Protective Influenza Antibody Titers (≥1:40 in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens) at Week 6.
Time Frame: End of single blind period (Week 6)
End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 2-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 3 of 6 Pneumococcal Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant Methotrexate (MTX) Use.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Percentage of Subjects Without Baseline Protective Titers Achieving a ≥ 4-fold Titer Increase in ≥ 2 of 3 Influenza Antigens at Week 6 by Concomitant MTX Use.
Time Frame: Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)
Baseline, End of single blind period (Week 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, +1-877-822-9493 (UCB)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe