A Study to Evaluate Corrected QT Interval and Drug-Drug Interaction of Trastuzumab on Carboplatin in the Presence of Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic or Locally Advanced Inoperable Cancer

November 5, 2015 updated by: Genentech, Inc.

A Phase 1b, Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate Corrected QT Interval and Drug-drug Interaction of Trastuzumab on Carboplatin in the Presence of Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

This Phase Ib, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the effect of trastuzumab on QTcF interval and to characterize the effects of trastuzumab on carboplatin pharmacokinetics in patients with HER2-positive metastatic or locally advanced inoperable cancer.

The QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The QTcF interval is the QT interval as calculated using Fridericia's correction; the QTcB interval is the QT interval as calculated using Bazett's correction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95403
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90603
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214-3728
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, United States, 59101
    • New Mexico
      • Farmington, New Mexico, United States, 87401
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologic documentation of a HER2-positive solid malignancy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >/= 50% by multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or two-dimensional echocardiography (ECHO) </= 42 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of trastuzumab treatment </= 100 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
  • Pretreatment QTcF interval > 450 ms as determined by local assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Intravenous repeating dose
Intravenous repeating dose
Intravenous repeating dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) at Trastuzumab Steady State
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Trastuzumab steady state was defined as the average of the 2 ECG measurements collected on Cycle 1 Day 8 (C1D8) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) after the trastuzumab infusion.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours Post Infusion (AUC0-6hr) of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
AUC0-6hr = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 6 hours post-infusion.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose-Normalized Cmax (Cmax/D) of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose normalized Cmax is the maximum observed concentration of carboplatin in plasma normalized for different dose levels.
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Geometric Mean Ratio of Cmax/D of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
The geometric mean ratio of Cmax of carboplatin was defined as the Cmax/D of carboplatin on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in the absence of trastuzumab) divided by Cmax/D of carboplatin on Cycle 2 Day 1 (in the presence of trastuzumab).
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose-Normalized AUC0-6hr (AUC0-6hr/D) of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
AUC0-6hr/D = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 6 hours post-infusion, normalized by carboplatin dose level.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Geometric Mean Ratio of AUC0-6hr/D of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
The geometric mean ratio of AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin was defined as the AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in the absence of trastuzumab) divided by AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin on Cycle 2 Day 1 (in the presence of trastuzumab).
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Carboplatin
Time Frame: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Time Frame: 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Trastuzumab
Time Frame: 15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Bazett's Correction (QTcB) at Trastuzumab Steady State
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Trastuzumab steady state was defined as the average of the 2 ECG measurements collected on Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1 after the trastuzumab infusion.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Baseline-adjusted QTcF, QTcB, PR Interval, and QRS Duration
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
For each postbaseline timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline measure was subtracted from his or her average of the triplicate ECG measure to create a "baseline-adjusted" corresponding ECG measure for each participant at each postbaseline timepoint.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Baseline-adjusted Heart Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
For each postbaseline timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline heart rate was subtracted from his or her average of the triplicate heart rate to create a "baseline-adjusted" corresponding heart rate for each participant at each postbaseline timepoint.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval Category
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum QTc less than or equal to (<=) 450 msec, greater than (>) 450 to <=470 msec, >470 to <= 500 msec, or >500 msec were reported.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in QTc Interval
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum increase from baseline of =>30msec, 30 to <60 msec (borderline) and >=60 msec (prolonged) were summarized.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With New Abnormal U Waves on ECG
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
The incidence of abnormal U-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read ECG tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: a large U wave, inverted U wave, or T-U fusion compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With New Abnormal T Waves on ECG
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
The incidence of abnormal T-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read ECG tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: an inverted T, flat T, or biphasic T compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline. Additionally, nonspecific T-wave changes from baseline were considered as abnormal nonsignificant changes from baseline. T-wave changes from baseline due to ventricular conduction or left ventricular hypertrophy strain were considered not evaluable.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Changes in PR Interval
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Criteria for abnormal changes in PR interval were defined as: =>25 percentage (%) change from baseline, an absolute value >200 msec, or >=25% change from baseline and an absolute value >200 msec.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Changes in QRS Interval
Time Frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Criteria for abnormal changes in QRS interval were defined as: >=25% change from baseline, an absolute value >110 msec, or >=25% change from baseline and an absolute value >110 msec.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Population Pharmacokinetics of Trastuzumab
Time Frame: 15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion, and 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
As per planned analysis, separate population pharmacokinetic analysis results are not available for the current study as this analysis is based on pooled data from multiple studies.
15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion, and 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Harald Weber, M.D., Genentech, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Cancers

Clinical Trials on carboplatin

Subscribe