Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

A Study to Evaluate Corrected QT Interval and Drug-Drug Interaction of Trastuzumab on Carboplatin in the Presence of Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic or Locally Advanced Inoperable Cancer

5. November 2015 aktualisiert von: Genentech, Inc.

A Phase 1b, Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate Corrected QT Interval and Drug-drug Interaction of Trastuzumab on Carboplatin in the Presence of Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic Cancer

This Phase Ib, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study is designed to evaluate the effect of trastuzumab on QTcF interval and to characterize the effects of trastuzumab on carboplatin pharmacokinetics in patients with HER2-positive metastatic or locally advanced inoperable cancer.

The QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The QTcF interval is the QT interval as calculated using Fridericia's correction; the QTcB interval is the QT interval as calculated using Bazett's correction.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

59

Phase

  • Phase 1

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, Vereinigte Staaten, 85258
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90211
      • La Jolla, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92093
      • San Diego, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92123
      • Santa Rosa, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 95403
      • Whittier, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 90603
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, Vereinigte Staaten, 33136
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, Vereinigte Staaten, 67214-3728
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, Vereinigte Staaten, 59101
    • New Mexico
      • Farmington, New Mexico, Vereinigte Staaten, 87401
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10461
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, Vereinigte Staaten, 38120
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Vereinigte Staaten, 37232
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 75230
      • Galveston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77555
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77030
      • Houston, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 77024
      • San Antonio, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 78229
      • Temple, Texas, Vereinigte Staaten, 76508
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98101

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologic documentation of a HER2-positive solid malignancy in patients with metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >/= 50% by multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or two-dimensional echocardiography (ECHO) </= 42 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of trastuzumab treatment </= 100 days prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
  • Pretreatment QTcF interval > 450 ms as determined by local assessment

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: 1
Intravenöse Wiederholungsdosis
Intravenous repeating dose
Intravenous repeating dose

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Correction (QTcF) at Trastuzumab Steady State
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Trastuzumab steady state was defined as the average of the 2 ECG measurements collected on Cycle 1 Day 8 (C1D8) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) after the trastuzumab infusion.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours Post Infusion (AUC0-6hr) of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
AUC0-6hr = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 6 hours post-infusion.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose-Normalized Cmax (Cmax/D) of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose normalized Cmax is the maximum observed concentration of carboplatin in plasma normalized for different dose levels.
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Geometric Mean Ratio of Cmax/D of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
The geometric mean ratio of Cmax of carboplatin was defined as the Cmax/D of carboplatin on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in the absence of trastuzumab) divided by Cmax/D of carboplatin on Cycle 2 Day 1 (in the presence of trastuzumab).
0 to 5 minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Dose-Normalized AUC0-6hr (AUC0-6hr/D) of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
AUC0-6hr/D = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 6 hours post-infusion, normalized by carboplatin dose level.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Geometric Mean Ratio of AUC0-6hr/D of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
The geometric mean ratio of AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin was defined as the AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in the absence of trastuzumab) divided by AUC0-6hr/D of carboplatin on Cycle 2 Day 1 (in the presence of trastuzumab).
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Carboplatin
Zeitfenster: 0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
0 to 5, 60 (±5), 120 (±10), 240 (±10), and 360 (±15) minutes after end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 (in absence of trastuzumab) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (in presence of trastuzumab)
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Zeitfenster: 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Trastuzumab
Zeitfenster: 15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change From Baseline in Corrected QT Interval Using Bazett's Correction (QTcB) at Trastuzumab Steady State
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Trastuzumab steady state was defined as the average of the 2 ECG measurements collected on Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1 after the trastuzumab infusion.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 2 Day 1
Baseline-adjusted QTcF, QTcB, PR Interval, and QRS Duration
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
For each postbaseline timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline measure was subtracted from his or her average of the triplicate ECG measure to create a "baseline-adjusted" corresponding ECG measure for each participant at each postbaseline timepoint.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Baseline-adjusted Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
For each postbaseline timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline heart rate was subtracted from his or her average of the triplicate heart rate to create a "baseline-adjusted" corresponding heart rate for each participant at each postbaseline timepoint.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval Category
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum QTc less than or equal to (<=) 450 msec, greater than (>) 450 to <=470 msec, >470 to <= 500 msec, or >500 msec were reported.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in QTc Interval
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum increase from baseline of =>30msec, 30 to <60 msec (borderline) and >=60 msec (prolonged) were summarized.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With New Abnormal U Waves on ECG
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
The incidence of abnormal U-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read ECG tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: a large U wave, inverted U wave, or T-U fusion compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With New Abnormal T Waves on ECG
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
The incidence of abnormal T-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read ECG tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: an inverted T, flat T, or biphasic T compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline. Additionally, nonspecific T-wave changes from baseline were considered as abnormal nonsignificant changes from baseline. T-wave changes from baseline due to ventricular conduction or left ventricular hypertrophy strain were considered not evaluable.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Changes in PR Interval
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Criteria for abnormal changes in PR interval were defined as: =>25 percentage (%) change from baseline, an absolute value >200 msec, or >=25% change from baseline and an absolute value >200 msec.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Changes in QRS Interval
Zeitfenster: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Criteria for abnormal changes in QRS interval were defined as: >=25% change from baseline, an absolute value >110 msec, or >=25% change from baseline and an absolute value >110 msec.
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (15 minutes predose), Cycle 1 Day 8 (30 minutes postdose), Cycle 2 Day 1 (15 minutes predose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (30 minutes postdose)
Population Pharmacokinetics of Trastuzumab
Zeitfenster: 15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion, and 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1
As per planned analysis, separate population pharmacokinetic analysis results are not available for the current study as this analysis is based on pooled data from multiple studies.
15 (±15) minutes prior to the start of the trastuzumab infusion, and 30 (±15) minutes after the end of the infusion on Cycle 1 Day 2, Cycle 1 Day 8, Cycle 2 Day 1, and Cycle 3 Day 1

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Harald Weber, M.D., Genentech, Inc.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Juli 2009

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2013

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2013

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

24. Juni 2009

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

24. Juni 2009

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

25. Juni 2009

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

10. Dezember 2015

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

5. November 2015

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. November 2015

Mehr Informationen

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Solide Krebserkrankungen

Klinische Studien zur Carboplatin

3
Abonnieren