A Safety and Efficacy Study of Sufentanil Transdermal System in Patients With Chronic Pain Due to Cancer

September 14, 2015 updated by: Labtec GmbH

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil Transdermal System (TDS) With Sustained-Release Morphine Sulfate in Patients With Chronic Pain Due to Cancer

The study hypothesis is that the safety and efficacy of sufentanil following transdermal application is comparable to sustained release morphine sulphate tablets in patients with chronic pain due to cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to compare the consumption, in milligrams, of rescue analgesia (normal release morphine sulfate tablets) after the administration of sufentanil TDS or sustained release morphine sulfate.

The secondary efficacy objectives of this study are to evaluate:

  • Pharmacokinetic data
  • Adverse events

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients aged 18 to 75 with a diagnosis of cancer;
  2. If female, is non-pregnant (negative pregnancy test at Visit 1) and non-lactating;
  3. If female, is not of childbearing potential
  4. Documented history of moderate to severe chronic cancer pain requiring around-the-clock therapy and are likely to benefit from WHO step III opioid analgesics for the duration of the study;
  5. Has been informed of the nature of the study and has provided written informed consent;
  6. Is willing, able, and competent to complete the entire study and comply with study instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is a pregnant or lactating female (serum pregnancy test conducted at the Screening Visit);
  2. Any ongoing serious adverse events (SAEs) at screening and at baseline;
  3. Has scheduled elective surgery or other invasive procedures during the period of study participation;
  4. Patients with a known intolerance to opioid analgesics or any excipient of the Investigational Product;
  5. Patients with respiratory depression with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, sever chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cor pulmonale, severe bronchial asthma, paralytic ileus, (obstructive) sleep apnea syndrome;
  6. Evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, hepatic or psychiatric disease, as determined by medical history, clinical laboratory tests, ECG results, and physical examination, that would place the patient at risk upon exposure to the study medication or that may confound the analysis and/or interpretation of the results;
  7. Abnormal aspartate aminotransferase (AST; SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; SGPT), or alkaline phosphatase levels (> 3 times the upper level of normal) or an abnormal total bilirubin level (> 1.5 times the upper level of normal) or creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min (calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula);
  8. Patients with uncontrolled seizures;
  9. Patients with increased intracranial pressure;
  10. Patients who are receiving hypnotics or other central nervous system (CNS) depressants that, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose a risk of additional CNS depression with opioid medication;
  11. Patients with myxoedema, inadequately controlled hypothyroidism or Addisons disease;
  12. History of alcohol and/or drug abuse (or a positive urine drug screen at Visit 1) within one year preceding the Screening Visit;
  13. Active skin disease;
  14. Patients suffering from diarrhea and/or opioid withdrawal;
  15. Known positive Hepatitis B or C or HIV status;
  16. Has participated in another clinical study of drugs or devices parallel to or < 1 month before study entry, or previous participation in this study;
  17. Is an employee of the investigator or study site with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study site, or is a family member of the employees or the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sufentanil Transdermal Delivery System
Experimental drug
Transdermal Delivery System; Apply up to six 3 cm2 sufentanil TDS patches every 3 days for 12 days of observation. The 12 days of observation begin after a 7 day conversion to sustained release morphine sulfate. If the subject continues on the pharmacokinetic portion of the study, an additional 6 days of intervention will be evaluated (at the same dose as the primary efficacy study).
Active Comparator: Control
Sustained release morphine sulfate
Sustained Release Morphine Sulfate tablets every 12 hours; up to 400 mg every day for 19 days (7 days of conversion to sustained release morphine sulfate and 12 days of observation)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The consumption (in mg) of rescue analgesia (normal release morphine sulfate tablets) per day after the administration of either sufentanil TDS or SR morphine sulfate.
Time Frame: 6 days
6 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 18 days
18 days
Pharmacokinetic data
Time Frame: 6 days
6 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe