Global Performance Evaluation of the AMS CONTINUUM™ Device

March 14, 2016 updated by: American Medical Systems

Global Performance Evaluation of the AMS CONTINUUM™ Device in Facilitating Vesico-Urethral Anastomosis Following a Radical Prostatectomy

  1. To evaluate Device performance in providing mucosa to mucosa apposition to facilitate sustainable vesico-urethral anastomosis during a radical prostatectomy procedure.
  2. To assess clinical outcomes of the Device in facilitating the vesico-urethral anastomosis following a radical prostatectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most utilized surgical treatment option for localized prostate cancer due to the multi-focal nature of the disease. RP is most suitable for otherwise healthy men whose cancer is limited to a small area. The RP procedure involves removing the prostate gland, seminal vesicles and nearby lymph nodes. One of the most technically challenging and critical aspects in all of these surgical approaches is reconstruction of the interrupted urinary tract by hand sewing the vesico-urethral anastomosis. This is where the bladder neck is sewn to the urethra after the prostate has been removed.

CONTINUUM™ (study Device) is to be used as part of the RP procedure by facilitating the approximation of the bladder neck and urethral stump. The Device brings together and holds the tissue in place until adequate natural healing of the vesico-urethral anastomosis occurs thereby minimizing extravasation. The Device also provides a conduit for drainage of urine from the bladder out the urethra during tissue healing.

The concept of the CONTINUUM™ device and the feasibility of its operation have been successfully tested in animal and human studies. Pilot clinical studies in the United States (G060095) found that the majority of subjects who received and were discharged with the Device demonstrated a water-tight vesico-urethral anastomosis at the first Device removal visit. Additionally, no unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) were reported. The focus of the proposed study is to further verify the performance of the Device in global research centers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rio-Patras, Greece, 26500
        • University of Patras
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Hospital University Gregorio Maranon

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All males ≥ 40 years old who are indicated for a radical prostatectomy will be eligible to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If contraindicated for surgery
  • Inability to understand the study or a history of non-compliance with medical advice
  • Unwilling or unable to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • A history of:

    1. Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI)
    2. Recurrent stricture disease
  • Neurological disease with a history of bladder dysfunction (e.g., Parkinson's disease)
  • Uncontrolled insulin-dependent diabetes
  • Chemotherapy within the past 6 months
  • Non-topical steroid use within the past 6 months
  • Allergy to nitinol, nickel, titanium or silicone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CONTINUUMTM
Performance of CONTINUUM™ in facilitating the vesico-urethral anastomosis following radical prostatectomy.
Other Names:
  • Anastomosis Device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful Device Placement
Time Frame: During Radical Prostatectomy
Successful Device placement was defined as the establishment of a water-tight anastomosis immediately post-Device placement.
During Radical Prostatectomy
Functionally Adequate Vesico-urethral Anastomosis Within 21 Days Post-procedure in Subjects With Successful Device Placement
Time Frame: 7-21 days post-Device placement

Device removal was first attempted at the 7-day window; if extravasation was noted, the subject returned for a second attempt at the 14-day window. If extravasation was noted at the first and second attempts, the subject could then return for a 3rd and final removal at the 21-day window.

The following defines the timeframe of each removal attempt:

  • 7-day window (7-10 days post-implant)
  • 14-day window (13-15 days post-implant)
  • 21-day window (19-21 days post-implant)
7-21 days post-Device placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intraoperative/Postoperative Parameters
Time Frame: At Device placement
At Device placement
Percentage of Subjects Demonstrating Functionally Adequate Anastomosis at the 1st and 2nd Device Removal Visits
Time Frame: 7 and 14 days post-Device placement
7 and 14 days post-Device placement
Incontinence Rate and I-QOL Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-week, 6 and 12-month evaluations
Baseline, 6-week, 6 and 12-month evaluations
Bladder Neck Contracture (BNC) Rate
Time Frame: Subjects that develop BNC between the scheduled follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-device removal
Subjects that develop BNC between the scheduled follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-device removal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evangelos Liatsikos, MD, University of Patras
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Hernandez, MD, Hospital University Gregorio Maranon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on CONTINUUM™

3
Subscribe