Risk Factors for Skeletal Related Events in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Bisphosphonates for Bone Metastases (PROVISTII)

January 6, 2015 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Prospective Identification of Risk Factors for Skeletal Related Events in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Bisphosphonates for Bone Metastases

Bone is the most common site of distant breast cancer recurrence, and 65-75% of women with advanced breast cancer will develop bone metastases during the course of their disease. The most pressing problem in management of bony metastases today, is the inability to reliably identify patients at high risk for skeletal related events (SREs) (such as bone fractures, surgery/radiotherapy for pain or prevention of fractures, high calcium levels, and spinal cord compression) despite the standard use of bone medication (bisphosphonates). Using the latest innovations both in imaging and blood tests, this novel pilot project will develop a risk model for predicting bone metastases, which will be able to identify patients who would most benefit from novel treatments, such as the multikinase inhibitor Zactima and the Src inhibitor, AZD0530. Given that approximately 1/3 of patients with metastatic breast cancer and bony disease will sustain an SRE despite use of a bisphosphonate, there is an urgent unmet need in this large population to introduce effective bone protective agents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Bone is the most common site of distant breast cancer recurrence, and 65-75% of women with advanced breast cancer will develop bone metastases during the course of their disease. Bone metastases can significantly adversely impact on quality of life by causing pain and skeletal related events (SREs) such as pathological fractures, surgery/radiotherapy for pain/prevention of fractures, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression. These complications of bone metastases may necessitate multiple medical, surgical, and radiation interventions. Indeed, prior to the widespread use of bisphosphonates, over two thirds (2/3) of women with bone metastases developed at least one SRE. Despite prolonged bisphosphonate use, many patients will continue to have progression of their bone metastases and develop SREs. The most pressing problem in management of bony metastases today, is the inability to reliably identify patients at high risk for SREs despite standard bisphosphonate use.

Using a prospective, observational trial design, we will develop a prognostic model with baseline serum C-telopeptide (sCTx) as the predictor variable and SREs as the outcome variable. 60 breast cancer patients with metastases to any site will be approached for participation in this prospective single centered study. Baseline characteristics (and potential risk factors) will be recorded upon study enrollment, including clinical factors (prior fragility fracture, use of corticosteroids, age), bone mineral density, performance status, measures of quality of life and pain. Novel markers such as sCTx and bone specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) will also be assessed. The WHO fracture risk assessment tool (http://www.shef.ac.uk) will be used to estimate baseline fracture risk according to osteoporosis guidelines and a calcium intake diet history will be taken. In addition, assessment of vertebral fractures will take place using two novel techniques, bone densitometric vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and high resolution quantitative CT (HR-pQCT). Bone mineral density along with VFA will be performed at baseline and at one year of treatment.

Patients will be assessed every twelve weeks for twenty-four months with regards to: symptoms related to SREs, ECOG status, pain (using the BPI, a 7-point scale of analgesic use), and quality of life (using the FACT-BP, and FACT-BTSQ). In addition to being measured at baseline, sCTx and bALP will be measured every twelve weeks for twenty-four months. Calcium and 25-hydroxy vitamin D will be measured annually as part of regular clinical practice, and a CT scan of the thorax and abdomen as well as a bone scan will be preformed at least once yearly as part of regular clinical practice for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Using the latest innovations both in imaging and medical biomarkers, this novel pilot project will develop a prospective risk model for predicting bone metastases, which will be able to identify patients who would most benefit from novel treatments, such as the multikinase inhibitor Zactima and the Src inhibitor, AZD0530.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

female breast cancer patients with metastases to any site

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with metastatic breast cancer treated at Princess Margaret Hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
breast cancer with metastasis
female breast cancer patients with metastases to any site

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skeletal related event
Time Frame: 0 to 24 months
Primary outcome is any SRE such as pathological fractures, surgery/radiotherapy for pain/prevention of fractures, hypercalcemia, and spinal cord compression.
0 to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe