Comparison Of 2 Doses Of Temsirolimus (Torisel) In Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma

May 17, 2019 updated by: Pfizer

A RANDOMIZED PHASE 4 STUDY COMPARING 2 INTRAVENOUS TEMSIROLIMUS (TEMSR) REGIMENS IN SUBJECTS WITH RELAPSED, REFRACTORY MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA

This study will compare the effectiveness and safety of two different doses of temsirolimus (Torisel).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia, 2217
        • St George Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    • Tasmania
      • Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7000
        • Royal Hobart Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Box Hill, Victoria, Australia, 3128
        • Box Hill Hospital
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • The Alfred Hospital
      • Praha 10, Czechia, 100 34
        • Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 128 08
        • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
    • Czech Republic
      • Praha 10, Czech Republic, Czechia, 10034
        • Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
      • Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France, 54500
        • CHU de Nancy
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Klinik fuer Onkologie und Haematologie, Medizinische Klinik IV
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Klinikum Johannes-Gutenberg -Universitaet, III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik
      • Catania, Italy, 95124
        • Presidio Ferrarotto - A.O.U. - PoliclinicoVittorio Emanuele
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • Dipartimento di Medicina Diagnostica, Clinica e di Sanità Pubblica
      • Torino, Italy, 10126
        • Struttura Complessa di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia-
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University
      • Krakow, Poland, 30-510
        • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.
      • Bucuresti, Romania, 030171
        • Spitalul Clinic Coltea, Clinica de Hematologie
      • Bucuresti, Romania, 022328
        • Institutul Clinic Fundeni Bucuresti, Sectia II Hematologie
      • Bucuresti, Romania, 050098
        • Spitalul Universitar de Urgenta Bucuresti, Clinica de Hematologie
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
        • Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry of Healthcare of Tatarstan Republic
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • GBOU VPO "First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University n.a. I.P.Pavlov"
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Transplantology R.M.Gorbacheva
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Clinical Centre of Serbia,Clinic for Hematology
      • Sremska Kamenica, Serbia, 21204
        • Oncology Institute of Vojvodina
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
        • Mercy Research Institute
    • New Jersey
      • East Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07018
        • Veterans Affairs New Jersey Healthcare System-Hematology/Oncology Section (111)
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73120
        • Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities dba Mercy Clinic Oncology/Hematology-McAuley
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73120
        • Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City-Oncology Infusion
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • Amy Shen, RPh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have confirmed mantle cell lymphoma diagnosis.
  • Have measurable disease.
  • Have received at least 2 prior treatment, which may include stem cell transplant.
  • Have adequate organ and bone marrow function.
  • There are other criteria--please discuss with your doctor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had any prior treatment with temsirolimus or mTOR inhibitor.
  • Had allogeneic stem cell transplant within last 6 months and on immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Has active or untreated brain or central nervous system metastases.
  • There are other criteria--please discuss with your doctor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: temsirolimus (Torisel) 175mg weekly x 3, then 75mg weekly
175mg IV once a week for first 3 weeks, followed by 75mg IV once a week until disease progression, provided that patient is tolerating treatment and getting clinical benefit
Other Names:
  • Torisel
75mg IV once a week until until disease progression, provided that patient is tolerating treatment and getting clinical benefit
Other Names:
  • Torisel
Active Comparator: temsirolimus (Torisel) 75mg weekly
175mg IV once a week for first 3 weeks, followed by 75mg IV once a week until disease progression, provided that patient is tolerating treatment and getting clinical benefit
Other Names:
  • Torisel
75mg IV once a week until until disease progression, provided that patient is tolerating treatment and getting clinical benefit
Other Names:
  • Torisel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Independently Assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of disease progression by the independent assessor or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

PFS = (earliest date of progression or death due to any cause- randomization date+1)/30.4.

PFS assessment was done using EMA guidelines for sensitivity analysis censoring.

Participants who were alive and progression-free at the time of analysis were censored on the date of last assessment; participants without adequate baseline assessment or without post-baseline assessments were censored on the randomization date; participants who died or progressed after 2 or more missed visits were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the missing visit; and participants who started new anti-cancer therapy prior to death or progression were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the start of anti-tumor treatment.

From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization date until death due to any cause (average follow up done for 56.1 months)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
From randomization date until death due to any cause (average follow up done for 56.1 months)
Independent Assessment - Objective Response Rate (ORR = CR + PR)
Time Frame: From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to the Cheson Criteria relative to all randomized Participants. Tumor responses were determined using information from objective measurements from computed tomography information including B-symptom evaluation, physical examination, ECOG performance status, assessment of liver and spleen, laboratory assessments such as bone marrow biopsies and/or aspirates, biochemical markers of disease activity and hematology results.

Participants who did not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation or who died, progressed or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the (CT) scans, as well as clinical assessment of ORR.

From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)
Investigator's Assessment ORR (ORR = CR + PR)
Time Frame: From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed CR or PR according to the Cheson Criteria relative to all randomized Participants. Tumor responses were determined using information from objective measurements from computed tomography information including B-symptom evaluation, physical examination, ECOG performance status, assessment of liver and spleen, laboratory assessments such as bone marrow biopsies and/or aspirates, biochemical markers of disease activity and hematology results.

Participants who did not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation or who died, progressed or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the (CT) scans, as well as clinical assessment of ORR.

From randomization date until end of treatment (average follow up done for 15 months)
Investigator Assessed PFS
Time Frame: From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of disease progression by the independent assessor or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

PFS = (earliest date of progression or death due to any cause- randomization date+1)/30.4.

PFS assessment was done using EMA guidelines for sensitivity analysis censoring.

Participants who were alive and progression-free at the time of analysis were censored on the date of last assessment; participants without adequate baseline assessment or without post-baseline assessments were censored on the randomization date; participants who died or progressed after 2 or more missed visits were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the missing visit; and participants who started new anti-cancer therapy prior to death or progression were censored on the date of last tumor assessment prior to the start of anti-tumor treatment.

From randomization date to the date of first documentation of progression or death (average follow up done for 15 months)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Infection- Related Adverse Events (AEs) With Grade 2 or Higher as Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time Frame: From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment emergent adverse event=as an event that emerged during treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pretreatment state. Treatment-emergent infection-related AEs included events: pneumonia, bronchitis, infection, herpes simplex, oral candidiasis and sepsis. Grading by NCI CTCAE Version 3.0.: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death.
From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Bleeding-Related AEs With Grade 2 or Higher as Per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time Frame: From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment emergent adverse event=as an event that emerged during treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pretreatment state. Treatment-emergent bleeding related AEs included events: epistaxis and ecchymosis. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.
From screening up to a maximum of 57.1 months
Quantify the Potential Effect of TEMSR on AUC and Cmax
Time Frame: From one week predose (Day -7, -4hr, -8hr, -48hr) upto 2 weeks post dose (4hr, 8hr, 48hr and Day 8)

Potential TEMSR effects were investigated by calculating the ratio of AUCs with and without concomitant TEMSR from the model-estimated effect of TEMSR on apparent clearance (CL/F) values and using individual ratios of observed Cmax values with and without concomitant temsirolimus, for both parent and metabolite. The AUC mean ratio was calculated as 1 / mean shift on apparent clearance from TEMSR, and the 90% CI of the AUC ratios was calculated as 1 / 90% CI of the shift on apparent clearance from TEMSR.

AUC: Area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity Cmax: Characterization of maximum observed plasma concentration

From one week predose (Day -7, -4hr, -8hr, -48hr) upto 2 weeks post dose (4hr, 8hr, 48hr and Day 8)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe