Radiation Planning Study for High Grade Brain Tumors

August 21, 2017 updated by: Alison Kastl, BS, CCRC, University of Cincinnati

3T Versus 1.5T MR Approaches in Target Definition for Malignant Gliomas: Is There a Significant Difference in Tumor Extent and Radiation Treatment Volume?

The purpose of this research study is to see if a higher strength MRI procedure provides better images to use in planning radiation treatments for patients with brain tumors in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • University of Cincinnati

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with high grade glioma planning to receive radiation therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed Grade III-IV glioma
  • Planning to undergo radiation therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Grade I or II glioma
  • Patients unable to undergo MRI imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
3T MRI
Patients receiving 3T MRI
3T MRI in addition to standard 1.5T MRI for treatment planning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment volume
Time Frame: 1 year average
To assess the difference in treatment volume for radiation planning in gliomas as calculated using 1.5T versus 3T magnets
1 year average

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Guarnaschelli, MD, University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High Grade Glioma

Clinical Trials on 3T MRI

Subscribe