Evaluate Effects and Safety of Pre-load Myfortic® in Transplant Patients

July 5, 2016 updated by: Adele Rike-Shields, University of Cincinnati

A 12-month, Prospective, Randomized, Dual Center, Open Label Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Myfortic® (Mycophenolic Acid) Loading Regimens in Combination With Thymoglobulin® [Anti-thymocyte Globulin (Rabbit)] or Simulect® (Basiliximab) Induction and Prograf® (Tacrolimus) in Early Corticosteroid Withdrawal

This study is specifically designed to determine whether the initiation of Myfortic 2 weeks prior to transplantation will enhance the therapeutic efficacy of Simulect induction therapy in low to moderate risk patients. Specifically, the addition of Myfortic pretransplant to Simulect induction will be compared to standard Myfortic therapy with Thymoglobulin induction starting at the time of transplant in kidney transplant recipients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients capable of understanding the purposes and risks of the study.
  • Patients who can give written informed consent, and who are willing and able to participate in the full course of the study.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within the last 48 hours prior to receiving study medication.
  • Women of childbearing potential must use two reliable forms of contraception simultaneously, unless they are status post bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy. Effective contraception must be used before beginning study drug therapy, for the duration of the study and for 6 weeks following completion of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are recipients of a multiple organ transplant or if the patient previously received and organ transplant.
  • Patients who are recipients of A-B-O incompatible transplants, all complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch positive transplants.
  • Sensitized patients [most recent anti-Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) Class I panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≥ 25% by a CDC-based assay].
  • Recipient or donor is known to be seropositive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) or B virus (HBV) except for hepatitis B surface antibody positive.
  • Recipient or donor is known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Patient has uncontrolled concomitant infection or any other unstable medical condition that could interfere with the study objectives.
  • Patients with thrombocytopenia (<75,000/mm3 ), with an absolute neutrophil count of < 1,500/mm3); and/or leucopoenia (< 2,500/mm3), or anemia (hemoglobin < 6 g/dL) prior to study inclusion.
  • Patient is taking or has been taking an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to transplant.
  • Patient has a known hypersensitivity to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, enteric-coated mycophenolic acid, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, or corticosteroids.
  • Patients with severe diarrhea or other gastrointestinal disorders that might interfere with their ability to absorb oral medication; diabetic patients with previously diagnosed diabetic gastroenteropathy, or patients with active peptic ulcer disease.
  • Patient is receiving chronic steroid therapy at the time of transplant.
  • Patients with a history of malignancy within the last five years, except for successfully excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Patient is pregnant or lactating, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by positive human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test.
  • Patient has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may invalidate communication with the investigator.
  • Inability to cooperate or communicate with the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Myfortic preload
Initiation of mycophenolic acid (Myfortic) 2 weeks prior to transplantation (with Simulect induction at time of transplant)
Comparing mycophenolic acid 720mg orally twice daily starting 2 weeks prior to transplant to mycophenolic acid 720mg orally twice daily starting day of transplant.
Other Names:
  • Myfortic
Active Comparator: Myfortic standard
mycophenolic acid (Myfortic) at time of transplant with Thymoglobulin induction
Comparing mycophenolic acid 720mg orally twice daily starting 2 weeks prior to transplant to mycophenolic acid 720mg orally twice daily starting day of transplant.
Other Names:
  • Myfortic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Biopsy-confirmed Acute Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (Updated 2007) 3, 6 and 12 Months Post Transplant
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months post transplant

Incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (updated 2007) post transplant. The acute form of T-cell mediated rejection is furthermore subclassified as follows. Since this is the most common form of rejection, it is useful to know:

As with humoral rejection, there are both acute & chronic forms:

The acute form of T-cell mediated rejection is furthermore subclassified as follows. Since this is the most common form of rejection, it is useful to know:

Class IA: there is at least 25% of parenchymal showing interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis (defined as a certain number of immune cells present in tubular cross-sections).

Class IB: just like Class IA except there is more severe tubulitis.

Class IIA: there is mild-to-moderate intimal arteritis.

Class IIB: there is severe intimal arteritis comprising at least 25% of the lumenal area.

Class III: there is transmural (e.g. the full vessel wall thickness) arteritis.

3, 6 and 12 months post transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Acute Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria
Time Frame: Severity 1 year post transplant

Severity of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (updated 2007) at 1 year. The acute form of T-cell mediated rejection is furthermore subclassified as follows. Since this is the most common form of rejection, it is useful to know:

As with humoral rejection, there are both acute & chronic forms:

The acute form of T-cell mediated rejection is furthermore subclassified as follows. Since this is the most common form of rejection, it is useful to know:

Class IA: there is at least 25% of parenchymal showing interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis (defined as a certain number of immune cells present in tubular cross-sections).

Class IB: just like Class IA except there is more severe tubulitis.

Class IIA: there is mild-to-moderate intimal arteritis.

Class IIB: there is severe intimal arteritis comprising at least 25% of the lumenal area.

Class III: there is transmural (e.g. the full vessel wall thickness) arteritis.

Severity 1 year post transplant
Difference in Renal Function
Time Frame: Difference at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Difference in renal function between groups at listed time points assessed by mean serum creatinine. Increased serum creatinine could indicate worsening renal function. A "normal" serum creatinine range for the transplant population varies by patient, but a typical range for Scr would be 1-2 mg/dL.
Difference at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Incidence of Chronic Alloantibody Rejection or Chronic Allograft Arteriopathy by Banff '97
Time Frame: 1 year
The Banff features suggestive of chronic rejection were: a) chronic transplant glomerulopathy: Glomerular basement membrane duplication and mesangial cell proliferation, and b) vasculopathy: Fibrous intimal thickening often with fragmentation of internal elastic lamina. Chronic changes in the interstitium (ci), tubules (ct), vessels (cv), and glomerulus (cg) were likewise graded into 0, 1, 2, and 3. The severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, as also chronic transplant glomerulopathy and vasculopathy were used to grade chronic allograft changes.
1 year
Number of Patients Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy for Acute Rejection
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adele Shields, Pharm.D., University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplant Recipients

Clinical Trials on mycophenolic acid

3
Subscribe