Ezetimibe In Addition To Atorvastatin Therapy On The Plaque Composition In Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. (OCTIVUS)

September 1, 2014 updated by: Mikkel Hougaard, Odense University Hospital

The Effect Of Ezetimibe In Addition To Optimal Cholesterol-Lowering Statin Therapy On The Plaque Composition In Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Assessed By Optical Coherence Tomography And Intravascular Ultrasound.

The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of the cholesterol lowering agent Ezetimibe when used in addition to optimal treatment with Atorvastatin in patients with acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) who have not been in prior statin therapy.

An area with arteriosclerosis not demanding intervention in a coronary vessel other than the infarct related is used as measuring point and is examined at time of the infarction and after 12 month using intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. At the same time the same techniques are used to examine the implanted stent.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with tissue characterization (IVUS-TC) are relatively new expansions to intravascular assessments, and has the capacity to assess plaque composition and, potentially, to identify vulnerable plaques. One of the mechanisms by which statins improve patient outcomes may be by changing the composition of a "vulnerable" plaque. The main effect is believed to rely on a lowering of LDL-c. The question is whether a further reduction of LDL by adding ezetimibe to optimal cholesterol lowering therapy using statins may result in further plaque stabilization or reduction. This is the hypothesis of the current study.

100 patients are randomized to Ezetimibe 10 mg per day or placebo. All patients are treated with Atorvastatin 80 mg. OCT and IVUS are performed at inclusion (typically the day after Primary PCI) and again at follow-up after 12 month.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Odense C, Denmark, 5000
        • Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
  • 20% < angiographic diameter stenosis < 50% on a not previously revascularized native coronary artery
  • Statin naïve
  • In fertile women: Ongoing contraception with IUD or hormonal contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pharmacologic lipid lowering treatment before index hospitalization
  • Atrial fibrillation, not well rate-controlled
  • Ventricle frequency variation with more than a factor 2 over 1 minute
  • Unconscious patients
  • History of statin induced myopathy, or serious hypersensitivity reaction to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) including Atorvastatin.
  • Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding, and women of childbearing potential who are not using chemical or mechanical contraception or have a positive serum pregnancy test (a serum-human chorionic gonadotrophin [Beta-HCG] analysis)
  • History of malignancy (unless a documented disease free period exceeding 5-years is present) with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Women with a history of cervical dysplasia would be permitted to enter the study provided they had 3 consecutive clear Papanicolaou (Pap) smears
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism (TSH > 1.5xULN)
  • Abnormal LFT's
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 5 years (this may affect compliance)
  • Current active liver disease (ALT/SGPT >2xULN or severe hepatic impairment (to protect patient safety as directed on the labels of currently approved statins)
  • Unexplained creatine kinase (CK > 3xULN) (To protect patient safety) (will be increased at baseline because of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction a few days before enrolment)
  • Serum creatinine >176mmol/L (2.0mg/dL) (unless the protocol specifically aims to investigate a chronic renal disease population)
  • Participation in another investigational drug study less than 4 weeks before enrolment in the study, or according to subjects local ethics committee requirements where a larger period is stipulated (to avoid potential misinterpretation of overlapping adverse events)
  • Treatments with cyclosporine
  • Treatment with gemfibrozil

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Atorvastatin plus Placebo
50/100 patients are randomized to Atorvastatin 80 mg per day plus placebo.
100 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction are randomized 1:1 to either placebo or Ezetimibe 10 mg per day in addition to treatment with Atorvastatin 80 mg in both arms.
Other Names:
  • Ezetrol
  • Zarator
Experimental: Atorvastatin plus Ezetimibe
100 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction are randomized 1:1 to either placebo or Ezetimibe 10 mg per day in addition to treatment with Atorvastatin 80 mg in both arms.
100 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction are randomized 1:1 to either placebo or Ezetimibe 10 mg per day in addition to treatment with Atorvastatin 80 mg in both arms.
Other Names:
  • Ezetrol
  • Zarator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque volume and composition in a non-significant coronary plaque
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
Plaque volume assessed by intravascular ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography
After 12 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in plaque-composition (measured with Tissue Characterization) in a 10 mm segment of a native coronary vessel with a non-significant stenosis where plaque-volume at baseline is greatest.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Change in percent of the plaque volume in the native coronary vessel with a non-significant stenosis.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Change in percent of the plaque volume in the 10 mm segment of a native coronary vessel with a non-significant lesion where plaque volume at baseline is greatest.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Change in absolute numbers of the plaque volume in the 10 mm segment of a native coronary vessel with a non-significant lesion where plaque volume at baseline is greatest.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Change in percent of the plaque burden in the 10 mm segment of a native coronary vessel with a non-significant lesion where plaque volume at baseline is greatest.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Change in percent of the plaque burden in a native coronary vessel with a non-significant lesion.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Incomplete stent apposition.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Edge response in stented segment.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Stent expansion.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Evaluation of the OCT-technique in clinical use compared to IVUS.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up
Evaluation of the Resolute stents effect on neointima growth and apposition.
Time Frame: After 12 months of follow-up
After 12 months of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mikkel Hougaard, MD, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe