Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut Mesh

June 19, 2014 updated by: Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
Women with pelvic floor prolapse who underwent surgery with mesh will be enrolled. The investigators will compare data from the chart, telephone interviews and physical examinations between those who underwent mesh placement to those who underwent placement of PIVS.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nahariya, Israel
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Galilee Hospital
      • Tel Aviv, Israel
        • Dr Neuman clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women who underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse who underwent surgery by eithe surgeon-cut-mesh or by PIVS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women who underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who did not have surgery for pelvic floor prolapse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Satisfaction with study outcome
Time Frame: six to twelve months after surgery
six to twelve months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Side effects of the surgery: pain, vaginal erosion by tape, bleeding
Time Frame: Within six to twelve months after study
Within six to twelve months after study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 920090042

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Prolapse

Subscribe