Transumbilical Versus Transvaginal Specimen Retrieval at Minilaparoscopy

February 23, 2012 updated by: Fabio Ghezzi, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
We hypothesise that pain at minilaparoscopy for gynecologic disease is reduced when transvaginal rather than transumbilical specimen extraction is accomplished. This would be due to the avoidance of a 10-mm port in the umbilicus. Visual analogue scale score of post-operative pain will be obtained and patients satisfaction will be asked at the 2-month postoperative visit.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Varese, Italy, 21100
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Universita' Dell'Insubria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adnexal Mass
  • Benign Gynecologic Condition
  • Laparoscopicb Surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Obliteration Of The Douglas Pouch

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TRANSVAGINAL EXTRACTION
Transvaginal specimen retrieval following posterior colpotomy
Active Comparator: TRANSUMBILICAL EXTRACTION
Transumbilical specimen retrieval following enlargement of the umbilical port

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • mini-LPS Specimen extraction

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on TRANSVAGINAL SPECIMEN EXTRACTION

3
Subscribe