Outcomes in Patients and Their Closest Relatives Treated for Congenital Heart Disease With Catheter Based or Surgical Techniques (MEQC)

September 24, 2012 updated by: Brith Andresen, Oslo University Hospital

Outcomes in Patients and Their Closest Relatives Treated for Congenital Heart Disease With Catheter Based or Surgical Techniques.

This study compares clinical, self- reported and cost outcomes in children and adolescents treated with pulmonary valve implantation, percutaneous versus open surgical technique. Since cardiac surgery in children and adolescents affect the whole family, the experience of the patients and their closest relatives are recorded and analysed separately. Cost may be an important factor in the choice of technology (1). Hence, the present study also aims to compare savings in costs, percutaneous versus open technique, related to the individual, their family and society.

1.2 Research questions

  1. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation or open heart surgery; what are the patients' and their closest relatives narrative experiences
  2. Is there a difference in patient and their closest relatives reported outcomes, measured as health related quality of life, in patients with congenital pulmonary disease before the event, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after percutaneous intervention versus open heart surgery approach?
  3. What is the relationship between patient reported outcomes and clinical outcomes before, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment?
  4. Are there savings in costs related to the individual and their family and society between the two techniques?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Sognsvannsvn 20
      • Oslo, Sognsvannsvn 20, Norway, 0027
        • Recruiting
        • The Interventional Centre, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Erik Fosse, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 50 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • secure indication of pulmonary valve dysfunction (stenosis and, or regurgitation)
  • an indication of surgical correction
  • body weight according to the recommendation from the producer of the device
  • moderate to serious dilatation of right ventricle
  • considerable leak in the tricuspidal valve
  • information from former surgery; conduit size, gradient of the stenosis measured by EKKO/MR/ catheterization, X-ray.
  • be able to speak and communicate well in Norwegian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • aggressive endocarditis
  • not circumferential deposit of calcium
  • < 20 kg
  • not able to understand, speak or communicate well in Norwegian

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: quality of life, clinical outcomes and costs
Quality of life, clinical outcomes and costs after two different treatment options in patients and closest relatives
Outcomes before percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation or open heart surgery before, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: up to 12 month's after treatment
Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation or open heart surgery; what are the patients and their closest relatives narrative experiences. Measured before the event, 1, 3, 6, and 12 month's after treatment.
up to 12 month's after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcomes
Time Frame: up to 12 months after treatment

What is the relationship between patient reported outcomes and clinical outcomes before, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment

Is there a difference in the effect of percutaneous versus open surgical technique on operative time, complication rate and reoperations in the peri- and postoperative period?

up to 12 months after treatment
Are there savings in costs related to the individual and their family and society between the two techniques?
Time Frame: up to 12 months after surgery
In order to describe and compare the differences in costs with patients outcomes and quality-adjusted life years, this study aim to calculate both in-hospital care and out-patient clinical costs between percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation and conventional open heart surgery. Measured Before the event, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.
up to 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erik Fosse, Professor/Head of Department, The Interventional Centre, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 25, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congenital Heart Defects

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation or open heart surgery

3
Subscribe