Adding Liraglutide to High Dose Insulin: Breaking the Cycle

December 15, 2017 updated by: Ildiko Lingvay

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the addition of liraglutide 1.8 mg/day to a high-dose insulin regimen (>1.8 units/kg/day) in patients with uncontrolled (HbA1c >7.5%) type 2 diabetes mellitus will improve blood sugar control.

It also evaluates the effect of liraglutide on liver and pancreatic fat content, explores the mechanism of blood sugar improvement by assessing weight and pancreatic hormone release, and assesses blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver function. Finally it will look at patient quality of life and safety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease with incessant beta-cell dysfunction that often ultimately requires insulin treatment. Patients requiring high insulin dosages represent a particular treatment challenge and often have uncontrolled glycemia despite progressive dose increases and are especially prone to insulin related lipotoxicity and weight gain.

Glucagon-like peptide agonists (GLP-1) such as liraglutide have many actions that position them to break the vicious cycle in this population through the following mechanisms: (1) weight loss; (2) improved hepatic steatosis; (3) improved pancreatic steatosis; (4) decreased glucagon levels; (5) improved beta-cell function.

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that liraglutide is both effective and safe when added to a high dose insulin treatment regimen. Liraglutide will improve glycemic control, weight, metabolic parameters, as well as patient satisfaction, with minimal adverse events. The study also proposes to study the mechanisms through which such improvements might occur, especially beta-cell function, glucagon levels, and hepatic and pancreatic fat content.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UT Southwestern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Insulin dose of >1.8 units/kg/day (represents total daily insulin dose, regardless of formulation, regimen, number of daily shots)
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and ≤ 11%
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Stable comorbidities on stable treatment regimens
  • Stable dose of all oral hypoglycemics for ≥ 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Ability to provide informed consent before any trial-related activities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Any contraindication to the MRI procedure (metallic implants, severe claustrophobia, pregnancy, unable to lie still on a hard table for the duration of the procedure, weight above 400 lb - limit of the MRI table, magnet's inner circumference smaller than the largest body circumference)
  • History of any pancreatic disease as it might interfere with the pancreatic TG measurement (i.e. pancreatitis, tumors, cysts, type 1 diabetes, any pancreatic surgery)
  • End Stage Renal Disease on dialysis due to increased risk of hypoglycemia, and possible interference with accurate measurement of HbA1c
  • Incretin therapy (any GLP-1 agonist or DPP-IV inhibitor)
  • Unstable or decompensated comorbidities
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or MEN-2 syndrome
  • Severe gastroparesis
  • Pregnancy, breast feeding, intention to become pregnant, or not using adequate contraceptive measures
  • Organ transplant recipient or waiting list candidate
  • Steroid use (current or potential use during the trial)
  • Known/suspected allergy to trial medication, excipients, or related products
  • Contraindications to study medications, worded specifically as stated in the product's prescribing information
  • Non-English speaking volunteers since no interpreters are available and the safety of the volunteers could be jeopardized if adequate and reliable communication is not possible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Liraglutide
Liraglutdie 1.8mg injected subcutaneously from pen device once daily for 6-months
Other Names:
  • Victoza
Placebo Comparator: Saline injection
Placebo injection of 1.8mg saline once daily for 6-months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic Control Measured by HbA1c
Time Frame: 6-months
HbA1c (%)
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pancreatic and Hepatic Triglyceride Content
Time Frame: 6-months
Liver Triglyceride and Pancreatic Triglyceride
6-months
Weight
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months
Beta-Cell Function
Time Frame: 6-months
Fasting Glucose as a Measure of Beta-Cell Function
6-months
Glucagon
Time Frame: 6-months
Measured during mixed meal challenge test.
6-months
Total Daily Insulin Dose
Time Frame: 6-months
The 3 days average of the total daily dose of insulin used within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.
6-months
Number of Daily Injections
Time Frame: 6-months
The 3 days average of the number of daily injections performed within 3 consecutive days prior office visit 6 month.
6-months
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months
Lipid Profile
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months
Liver Function Blood Test
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months
Hypoglycemic Events
Time Frame: 6-months
Reported as hypoglycemic events per month by patient as any blood glucose <70 mg/dl or symptoms of hypoglycemia with blood glucose >70 mg/dl
6-months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - General Health Perception
Time Frame: 6-months
General health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = excellent; 2 = very good; 3 = good; 4 = fair; 5 = poor.
6-months
Beta-Cell Function
Time Frame: 6 months
Fasting C-peptide as a Measure of Beta-Cell Function
6 months
Matsuda Index as a Measure of Beta Cell Function
Time Frame: 6 months
The Matsuda index is a measure of insulin sensitivity and has no minimum/maximum values. Index values are calculated as 500,000/square root of ((fasting glucose x fasting c-peptide x 333) x (mean 120 min post-meal glucose x mean 120 min post-meal c-peptide x 333)). Higher/lower values = better/worse insulin sensitivity.
6 months
Beta-cell Function
Time Frame: 6 Months
AUC c-peptide
6 Months
Ratio (AUC C-peptide/AUC Glucose)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
AUC Glucose
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Current Health Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Current health perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 = much better than 3 months ago; 2 - Somewhat better now than 3 months ago; 3 - About the same; 4 - Somewhat worse now than 3 months ago; 5 Much worse now than 3 months ago.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - treatment satisfactionTreatment satisfaction was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Treatment Impact
Time Frame: 6 months
Treatment impact was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - very satisfied; 2 - moderately satisfied; 3 - neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4 - moderately dissatisfied; 5 - very dissatisfied.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social or Vocational Worry
Time Frame: 6 months
Social or vocational worry was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 0-5, where 0 - does not apply; 1 - never; 2 - seldom; 3 - sometimes; 4 - often; 5 - all of the time.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Hypoglycemia Fear
Time Frame: 6 months
Hypoglycemia fear was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1-5, where 1 - never worry; 2 - rarely water; 3 - sometimes worry; 4 - often worry; 5 - very often worry.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Glycemia Control Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Glycemia control perception was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1-7, where 1 - extremely controlled and 7 - not at all controlled.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Lifestyle Flexibility
Time Frame: 6 months
Lifestyle flexibility was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 - a great deal of choice; 2 - a lot of choice; 3 - some choice; 4 - a little choice; 5 - no choice.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Social Stigma
Time Frame: 6 months
Social stigma was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a Likert scale score of 1 to 5, where 1 strongly agree; 2 - somewhat agree; 3 - neither agree nor disagree; 4 - somewhat disagree; 5 - strongly disagree.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Satisfaction With Insulin Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfaction with insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely satisfied to 7 - not at all satisfied.
6 months
Quality of Life Survey (QoL) - Willingness to Continue Insulin Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Willingness to continue insulin treatment was measured at randomization and 6 months later using the modified Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire. This questionnaire addresses several areas with respect to diabetes QoL. Answers are in the form of a scale score of 1 to 7, where 1 extremely willing to 7 - not at all willing.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ildiko Lingvay, MD, UT Southwestern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Liraglutide

Subscribe