Central Auditory Processing Deficits Associated With Blast Exposure

The current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq have resulted in unprecedented rates of exposure to high-intensity blasts and resulting brain injury. This research team has established that recently blast-exposed Soldiers show differences from controls on tests of central auditory function. This project will 1) develop a more accurate estimate of the prevalence of central auditory dysfunction among Veterans exposed to blasts over the past ten years, 2) identify the functional outcomes associated with abnormal performance on tests of central processing, and 3) improve understanding of the ways in which blast-exposure resembles and differs from both the normal aging process and non-blast-related TBI in terms of performance on tests of central auditory processing.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Brain Injuries; Blast Injuries; Age Factors
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Diagnostic

Detailed Description

The current conflicts in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom; OEF) and Iraq (Operation Iraqi Freedom; OIF) have resulted in unprecedented rates of exposure to high-intensity blasts and resulting brain injury. Dennis (2009) reports that during 2005-2007, 68% of U.S. military personnel injured in the OEF/OIF conflicts had blast-related injuries and 28%-31% of those evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC), Washington, DC had brain injuries. While the common focus of auditory evaluation is on damage to the peripheral auditory system, the prevalence of brain injury among those exposed to high-intensity blasts suggests that damage to the central auditory system is an equally important concern for the blast-exposed Veteran. Discussions with clinical audiologists and OEF/OIF Veterans Service Office personnel suggest that a common complaint voiced by blast-exposed Veterans is an inability to understand speech in noisy environments, even when peripheral hearing is within normal or near-normal limits (see attached letters of support). Such complaints are consistent with damage to neural networks responsible for higher-order auditory processing. This proposal is the second phase of a research project focused on examining the degree to which central auditory processing (CAP) dysfunction is a result of blast exposure. Over the initial period of funding, data collection at WRAMC and the VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR) established that CAP dysfunction is present in Warfighters exposed to high-intensity blasts while serving in combat. Recently blast-exposed patients with and without diagnoses of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) tested at WRAMC showed differences from controls tested at NCRAR on one or more behavioral and neurophysiological tests used to evaluate central auditory function. This project will 1) develop a more accurate estimate of the prevalence of central auditory dysfunction among Veterans exposed to blasts over the past ten years, 2) identify the functional outcomes associated with abnormal performance on tests of central processing, and 3) improve understanding of the ways in which blast-exposure resembles and differs from both the normal aging process and non-blast-related TBI in terms of performance on tests of central auditory processing.

Key Question 1: To what extent is CAP dysfunction observable among OEF/OIF Veterans who have been exposed to high intensity blasts? Based on preliminary data, the investigators hypothesize that the rate of abnormal performance on behavioral and neurophysiological tests of CAP dysfunction will be higher in a group of Veterans exposed to blasts than it will be in a control group of similar ages and hearing thresholds who have not been exposed to blasts.

Key Question 2: How well can behavioral and neurophysiological tests of CAP predict functional auditory deficits measured behaviorally and through self report? It is hypothesized that tests of CAP ability will predict performance in a testing situation involving multiple talkers delivering competing messages. CAP tests will also correlate with responses blast-exposed Veterans make on the Speech and Spatial Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire, designed to examine functional hearing ability in various acoustically complex environments.

Key Question 3: To what extent do blast-exposed Veterans resemble older listeners and participants with mild TBI who have not been exposed to blasts in their performance on CAP tests and functional tests of hearing? It is hypothesized that comparisons of the blast-exposed group with an older group with matched pure-tone sensitivity and an age- and hearing-matched group with non-blast-related TBI will be consistent with premature aging in the blast-exposed group but demonstrate substantive differences with the non-blast group.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 105

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Oregon
    • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
      • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

community sample

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Aged 18-90
• Pure-tone sensitivity of 40 dB HL or better at all audiometric frequencies below 8 kHz
• English as first language.

Group membership inclusion criteria:

Group 1: Blast exposed Veterans

• Report having been exposed to high-intensity blast during the ten years prior to enrollment
• Cognitive and physical ability to take part in these auditory evaluations

Group 2. Non-blast TBI group

• Diagnosed with mild-to-moderate TBI

Group 3. Age matched control group -18-59 years.

Group 4. Older control group

• 60-90 years.
• Older group will be aged 60 and older

Audiometric status of these groups will be required to meet the same exclusion criteria as that of the other two groups described above

Exclusion Criteria:

• Evidence of conductive or retrocochlear dysfunction

• Hearing loss exceeding pure-tone averages for frequencies of .5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz of 35 dB HL

  --Hearing loss of greater than 40 dB HL at any one of these frequencies in either ear

• Asymmetrical hearing thresholds exceeding 10 dB at any audiometric frequency below 4 kHz
• Abnormal cognitive function as indicated by scores of 23 or below on the Mini Mental State Exam
• Indications of clinical depression as evidenced by a score of 17 or greater on the Beck Depression Inventory

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Case-Control
• Time Perspectives: Prospective

Number of groups / cohorts

4

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort	Intervention / Treatment
Control; Non-blast-exposed and non-TBI, aged younger than 50	Other: Diagnostic; All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities.
Blast; Blast-exposed with or without a TBI diagnosis	Other: Diagnostic; All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities.
Non-Blast-Exposed TBI; Non-blast-exposed with TBI diagnosis	Other: Diagnostic; All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities.
Older; Non-blast-exposed and non-TBI, aged 50 or older	Other: Diagnostic; All participants will be evaluated with a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological measures to assess central auditory processing abilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Blast-exposed Veterans With Abnormal Abilities in One or More Behavioral Tests of Central Auditory Processing	Tests to be administered: Dichotic Digits Test: Percentage of digits reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Gaps in Noise Test: Approximate threshold in milliseconds from 2 (best) to 20 (worst) Staggered Spondaic Words Test: Total number of errors from 0 (best) to 40 (worst) Masking Level Differences Test: Difference in threshold between diotic and dichotic stimuli in decibels from 0 (worst) to 24 (best) Frequency Pattern Test: Percentage of sequences reported correctly from 0 (worst performance) to 100 (best performance) Adaptive Tests of Temporal Resolution: Not reported due to software error in stimulus presentation	six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Ratings of Self-reported Ability to Process Auditory Information in Various Settings	Hearing Health Inventory for Adults is a 25 item questionnaire that asks participants to rank how often auditory issues create problems in daily life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater perceived levels of handicap.	six months
Functional Hearing Ability in Multitalker Environments	The Functional Hearing Questionnaire (FHQ), developed for veterans with brain injuries was used to evaluate self perceived hearing difficulties. The FHQ is a nine item questionnaire that asks participants to rate their level of difficulty hearing in different circumstances on a four point scale. Scores range from 9 to 36, with higher scores indicating a greater level of difficulty.	six months
Percent Change in P2 Component of Electrophysiological Response	Average change in amplitude of the P2 component of the electrophysiological response to paired clicks. Habituation to the clicks is anticipated, resulting in a large percentage change in amplitude to the second click.	six months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: VA Office of Research and Development
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Frederick J Gallun, PhD, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Fausti SA, Wilmington DJ, Gallun FJ, Myers PJ, Henry JA. Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):797-810. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0118.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: May 1, 2012
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2015
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 2, 2012
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 27, 2012
• First Posted (Estimate): March 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 14, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 19, 2019
• Last Verified: March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Hearing Loss; Traumatic Brain Injury; Central Auditory Processing
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Barotrauma; Brain Injuries; Wounds and Injuries; Blast Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: C7755-I

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Yes
• IPD Plan Description: Data sharing will be through an established data repository overseen by the VA Portland HCS IRB.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Available starting Jan 2016, and continuing to be available as long as a repository director is available to oversee the data.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: IRB approved protocol allowing data to be transferred from repository to recipient study.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: Analytic Code