Developing and Implementing an Interdisciplinary Team-Based Care Approach (ITCA-ThyCa) for Thyroid Cancer Patients (ITCA-ThyCa)

February 22, 2016 updated by: Melissa Henry, Jewish General Hospital

Developing and Implementing an Interdisciplinary Team-Based Care Approach (ITCA-ThyCa) For Newly Diagnosed Thyroid Cancer Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

While thyroid cancer is generally associated with a favourable prognosis, there is a discrepancy with how important if not traumatic its impact can be on patients. Quality of life (QoL) decreases in the year following a thyroid cancer diagnosis, constituting an optimal period for a preventive intervention. The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of offering an interdisciplinary team-based care approach for newly diagnosed thyroid cancer patients, including a dedicated nurse who will provide important psychoeducational elements identified in previous focus group studies of thyroid cancer patients, i.e., information on: the physical illness; the emotional impact of being newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer; surgery and its' short- and long-term consequences; radioactive iodine treatments and its associated safety precautions, nutrition and dietary considerations; and how the cancer diagnosis can be an opportunity to make important lifestyle changes and establish new life-priorities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a 2-arm Randomized Controlled Trial comparing an Interdisciplinary Team-Based Care Approach to usual care.

The primary research question will be: Does adding the Interdisciplinary Team-Based Care Approach (ITCA-ThyCa) to usual care (EG) increase levels of overall QoL among newly diagnosed thyroid cancer patients, compared with those receiving usual care (UC), at 9 months post-randomization (i.e., after all of the dedicated-nurse meetings are administered) as judged by scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)? Primary hypothesis: The EG will report higher scores of overall QoL on the FACT-G than the UC at 9 months post-randomization.

Secondary research questions: The investigators plan to evaluate ITCA-ThyCa effects on secondary outcomes such as level of: physical health (SF-36 Physical Health subscale), mental health (SF-36 Mental Health subscale), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; FACIT-F), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS), and negative illness perception (Illness Perception Questionnaire - Revised (IPQ-R). The investigators also plan to explore ITCA-ThyCa effects on satisfaction with care (16 questions of the NRC Picker satisfaction survey measuring patient satisfaction with care) and healthcare service use (types of professionals consulted, frequency of visits, and time elapsed between referral and first consultation). Hypotheses: The EG will report a higher level of physical and mental health on the SF-Physical and Mental Health subscales, respectively; and a lower level of fatigue on the FACIT-F, anxiety and depression on the HADS, and negative illness perception on the IPQ-R; compared with the UC at 9 months post-randomization.

All of the abovementioned changes will be present throughout the treatment, namely at 7-10 days and 5 months post-randomization (i.e., immediately after each of the meetings planned with the dedicated nurse).

All of the abovementioned changes will persist at 12 months post-randomization (i.e., corresponding to 6 months after all anti-cancer treatments are completed and 3 months after all dedicated-nurse meetings have been administered).

Feasibility and acceptability (9 first months of the trial):

The investigators plan on testing the feasibility and acceptability of the 2-arm RCT of ITCA-ThyCa during the first 9 months of the trial (once the investigators start recruiting, after the first 3-6 months dedicated to hiring our personnel and developing the manual of our approach). During this phase, the investigators will aim to address the following research questions:

  1. Can the investigators recruit a sufficient number of patients (i.e., a minimum of 60 patients over 6 months or 10/month) and retain a sufficient proportion of thyroid cancer patients (i.e., at least 80% at 7-10 days, 5 months or 9 months post-randomization) in both trial arms?
  2. Is ITCA-ThyCa acceptable to at least 80% of EG thyroid cancer patients? Secondary pilot study questions
  3. Which evaluation time should be primary post-randomization, based on an acceptable retention rate of 80%?
  4. What variance estimates can be used to inform calculation of sample size for the full study?

If the design remains the same following this pilot, the investigators aim to roll in the pilot data in the full trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E8
        • Jewish General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed with a first occurrence of thyroid cancer <2-4 weeks of diagnosis (i.e., histologically confirmed thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular, or medullary type; TNM classification system);
  • Willing to participate in the EG meetings;
  • >18 years;
  • Alert and capable of giving free and informed consent;
  • Able to speak and read English or French.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anaplastic thyroid cancer;
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score <60 (rated by the Research Coordinator (RC) or referring physician) or expected survival <6 months according to clinical judgment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interdisciplinary Team-Based Approach
The delivered intervention will be to provide patients with an interdisciplinary team-based approach defined as care provided by a variety of professionals, each having their own domain of expertise, defined roles and responsibilities, who work together and meet to discuss patient needs and develop comprehensive treatment plans. Team composition will include physicians, a dedicated nurse, and allied professionals (e.g., dieticians, social workers, psychologists). The dedicated nurse will have a central integrative role in this interdisciplinary team and will provide patients with information about their illness and treatment, symptom management, emotional support, and reference to other resources when needed
Three meetings will be scheduled with the oncology dedicated-nurse. First meeting: information about the physical illness; the emotional impact of being newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer; as well as surgery and its' short- and long-term consequences. Second meeting: information on radioactive iodine treatments and its associated safety precautions, nutrition and dietary considerations. Third meeting: how the cancer diagnosis can be an opportunity to make important lifestyle changes and establish new life-priorities. The dedicated nurse, in collaboration with the Department of Nursing and ENT, will develop and implement an interdisciplinary team-based approached developed for this study according to guidelines of the Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer (PQLC).
Other Names:
  • Interdisciplinary Team-Based Approach (ITCA-ThyCa)
Other: Usual Care Control Group
Patients in the control group will be provided with usual care, comprised of meetings with surgeons and endocrinologists. All patients in this study will be provided with an information website containing information on their cancer, treatments, and treatment side-effects.
Patients in the control group will be provided with usual care, comprised of meetings with surgeons and endocrinologists. All patients in this study will be provided with an information website containing information on their cancer, treatments, and treatment side-effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall quality of life
Time Frame: 9 months post-randomization
Measure: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General (FACT-G)
9 months post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of physical health
Time Frame: 9 months post-randomization
Measure: SF-36 Physical Health subscale
9 months post-randomization
Level of mental health
Time Frame: 9 month post-randomization
Measure: SF-36 Mental Health subscale
9 month post-randomization
Level of fatigue
Time Frame: 9 months post-randomization
Measure: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)
9 months post-randomization
Level of anxiety and depression (combined)
Time Frame: 9 month post-randomization
Measure: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
9 month post-randomization
Level of negative illness perception
Time Frame: 9 month post-randomization
Illness Perception Questionnaire - Revised (IPQ-R)
9 month post-randomization
Level of satisfaction with care
Time Frame: 9 month post-randomization
16 questions of the NRC Picker satisfaction survey measuring patient satisfaction with care
9 month post-randomization
Healthcare service use
Time Frame: Over 9 months post-randomization
Types of professionals consulted, frequency of visits, and time elapsed between referral and first consultation
Over 9 months post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Henry, PhD, Jewish General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Cancer

Clinical Trials on Interdisciplinary Team-Based Approach

Subscribe