Improved Treatment for Patients With Long-term Opioid Therapy for Non-cancer Pain in Primary Care (Opi-Prim)

May 8, 2026 updated by: Thomas Kempen, Uppsala County Council, Sweden

Improved Treatment for Patients With Long-term Opioid Therapy for Non-cancer Pain in Primary Care (Opi-Prim)

The goal of this clinical trial is to reduce inappropriate long term opioid treatment (LTOT) and to optimize pain management in patients with LTOT for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care through a new person-centred and team-based approach. The main question it aims to answer is:

What are the effects of a new person-centred and team-based approach on pain interference in patients with LTOT for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care?

Researchers will compare a new person-centred and team-based approach to usual care to see if pain interference is lower.

Participants will receive a person-centred team-based treatment consisting of:

  • Phase 1 (investigation and assessment, week 1-3): A medication review, pain analysis and other assessments through separate visits to a pharmacist, general practitioner, physiotherapist, psychologist and care manager
  • Phase 2 (treatment plan, week 3-4): A team consultations with all healthcare personnel involved in Phase 1 including the patient where an individualized rehabilitation plan is made based.
  • Phase 3 (treatment and follow-up, week 4-24): Implementation of the individualized rehabilitation plan with frequent follow-up contacts (1 per 1-3 weeks) by phone with the care manager.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The evidence for prescribing opioids to patients suffering from chronic non-cancer pain is weak, and using opioids in these circumstances is questionable. Swedish primary health care is responsible for about one-third of all first-time opioid prescriptions and has the highest rate of prescription renewals for opioids. The decision for long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) should rest on an accurate pain analysis and should result in an individualized assessment where the risks of LTOT are set against the impact on quality of life that living with long-term pain entails. Multi-professional interventions and a person-centered approach are recommended for chronic non-cancer pain. Although pharmacists in primary health care have been established internationally with successful examples related to LTOT, their role in Swedish primary care and the management of chronic non-cancer pain remains to be studied. Currently, it is unclear which interventions are effective in reducing inappropriate LTOT and which alternative interventions are suitable for patients who are currently receiving LTOT. The involvement of a care manager in the patient´s care has shown promising results regarding quality of care for other long-term conditions, for example depresssion. In Region Uppsala, clinical pharmacists havte recently been employed in primary health care, but it is unclear what their tasks and responsibilities are and how to best make use of their competence. It is therefore relevant and justified to investigate a new person-centered team-based approach including care manager and pharmacist to optimize the management of pain in patients with chronic non-cancer pain in Swedish primary care. This project aims to reduce inappropriate LTOT and optimize pain management in patients with LTOT for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care through a new person-centered and team-based approach.

Primary objective:

To investigate the effects of a new person-centred and team-based approach on pain interference in patients with LTOT for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care

Trial design and setting:

This study is a controlled before-and-after study that has been designed, and will be reported, according to the CONSORT guidelines. Participation will be during 52 weeks (12 months).

This study will be conducted at eight healthcare centres in Region Uppsala. At four of the healthcare centres, a new person-centred team-based treatment model including pharmacists (intervention) will be implemented. Prerequisites for these healthcare centres are the accessibility of at least one person of each healthcare profession: pharmacist, general practitioner (GP), psychologist (or social worker) and physiotherapist, where one of these (or a rehabilitation coordinator or a nurse) takes the role of care manager. Healthcare personnel will receive special training in managing patients with chronic pain before the study. In addition, four control healthcare centres without a pharmacist will be matched with the intervention healthcare centres according to geographic area (urban, suburban, rural), socioeconomical setting and the size of the centres (number of listed patients). No specific efforts of implementation will be made in these control centres.

Prior to the full trial, a feasibility study will be conducted at one intervention centre and one control centre with 12 weeks follow-up per participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Sörmland
      • Strängnäs, Sörmland, Sweden
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Region Sörmland
        • Contact:
    • Uppsala County
      • Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Region Uppsala
        • Contact:
    • Örebro County
      • Örebro, Örebro County, Sweden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having received the equivalent of 90 days or more prescription of opioids for chronic pain made by the general practitioner during the recent 12 months
  • Able to speak Swedish or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having been referred to a pain clinic (either at hospital or multimodal rehabilitation in primary care) within the last 6 months
  • No current opioid use, severe cognitive dysfunction, e.g., suicidal ideation, psychotic symptoms, or dementia, that prevents informed consent.
  • Using their opioids for cancer pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Participants in the control healthcare centres will receive usual care. This may include appointments and treatment by a general practitioner, nurse, physiotherapist and/or psychologist. No pharmacist will be working at the healthcare centre. However, Uppsala County Council does provide centralized medication review services to all primary healthcare centres in Region Uppsala. Any healthcare professional may request a medication review by a pharmacist on a work-from-home basis as part of usual care.
Active Comparator: Intervention

Phase 1 (investigation and assessment, week 1-3):

  • A medication review focusing on pain, sleep and depression/anxiety disorders by a pharmacist.
  • A thorough pain analysis by a GP according to existing guidelines including duration of pain, pain localization and pain mechanisms.
  • A visit to a physiotherapist for evaluation and assessment of possible treatment regarding physical exercise/physical activities.
  • A visit to a psychologist for diagnostics and treatments regarding psychological and social factors.
  • A visit to a care manager

Phase 2 (treatment plan, week 3-4):

- A team consultation with all healthcare personnel involved in Phase 1 including the patient where an individualized rehabilitation plan is made.

Phase 3 (treatment and follow-up, week 4-24):

  • Implementation of the individualized rehabilitation plan.
  • Frequent follow-up contacts (1 per 1-3 weeks) by phone with an established contact person, i.e. care manager.
  • A second team consultation half-way

Phase 1 (investigation and assessment, week 1-3):

  • A medication review focusing on pain, sleep and depression/anxiety disorders by a pharmacist.
  • A thorough pain analysis by a GP according to existing guidelines including duration of pain, pain localization and pain mechanisms.
  • A visit to a physiotherapist for evaluation and assessment of possible treatment regarding physical exercise/physical activities.
  • A visit to a psychologist for diagnostics and treatments regarding psychological and social factors.
  • A visit to a care manager

Phase 2 (treatment plan, week 3-4):

- A team consultation with all healthcare personnel involved in Phase 1 including the patient where an individualized rehabilitation plan is made.

Phase 3 (treatment and follow-up, week 4-24):

  • Implementation of the individualized rehabilitation plan.
  • Frequent follow-up contacts (1 per 1-3 weeks) by phone with an established contact person, i.e. care manager.
  • A second team consultation half-way

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain interference
Time Frame: The primary outcome measure will be the difference in mean pain interference after 6 months.
Measured with the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF), question number 9 a-g. Scale: 0-10. Higher score is worse.
The primary outcome measure will be the difference in mean pain interference after 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF), question number 3-8. Scale: 0-10. Higher score is worse
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Symptoms of depression
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scale: 0-27. Higher score is worse
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Symptoms of anxiety
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the General Anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7). Scale: 0-27. Higher score is worse
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the Patients´ Global impression of Change (PGIC). Scale: 0-6. Higher score is worse
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Quality of life according to the 5-level EuroQol 5D
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the 5-level EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D-5L). Scale: 1-5 per dimension. Higher score is worse.
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Opioid use
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with as morphine equivalents: in mg.
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Symptoms of withdrawal
Time Frame: After 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured with the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS). Scale: 0-40. Higher score is worse
After 3, 6 and 12 months
Pain interference
Time Frame: After 3 and 12 months
Measured with the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF), question number 9 a-g. Scale: 0-10. Higher score is worse.
After 3 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Opi-Prim

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Person-centred team-based approach

Subscribe