Computerized Stage-Matched Intervention for Juvenile Offenders

September 27, 2016 updated by: Deborah Levesque, Pro-Change Behavior Systems
Juvenile crime imposes enormous costs on victims, on society, and on juvenile offenders themselves. However, research assessing the efficacy of interventions for young offenders show, on average, only small effects on recidivism, substance abuse, and other behavioral outcomes. A major problem with existing interventions is that they tend to neglect individual differences in motivation and readiness to make positive changes. In earlier research, we used an empirically validated model of behavior change, the Transtheoretical Model (TTM, the "stage" model), and expert system technology to develop the Rise Above Your Situation program (RAYS), a prototype of a multimedia computerized tailored intervention designed as an adjunct to traditional juvenile justice programs. The intervention delivers assessments and individualized feedback matched to readiness to stay out of trouble with the law and quit alcohol and drugs. At the end each session the program also generates a helpgiver report that summarizes the youth's feedback and presents concrete, easy-to-implement strategies helpgivers can use to reinforce stage-matched concepts. In the current research, the goals are to complete development of the computerized tailored intervention; develop training and other support materials for helpgivers; and assess the efficacy of the intervention package in a randomized clinical trial involving 700 medium- to high-risk court-involved juveniles aged 13-17 recruited by 54 probation officers randomly assigned to treatment or standard care. Primary outcomes will be criminal recidivism and substance abuse abstinence at 6 and 12 months follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Fifty-four probation officers employed by the Iowa's Juvenile Court Services agreed to participate in the study and to be randomly assigned to treatment or standard care. A Multiattribute Utility Measurement Approach (Graham, Flay, Johnson, Hansen, & Collins, 1984) was used to ensure that probation officers assigned to the two conditions were approximately equivalent on level of education, years of experience working with juvenile offenders, number of hours of training on the TTM, and confidence using the TTM in their work.

Probation officers were responsible for recruiting moderate- and high-risk youth on probation, and delivering baseline assessment sessions and intervention sessions. However, local project site coordinators were available to provide assistance, as needed.

Computerized follow-up assessments and urine drug testing at 6 and 12 months follow-up are being administered by "trackers" at a time and place that is convenient for the youth. Study protocols include best practices (Scott, 2004) for maximizing retention at follow-up in research involving high-risk populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States, 52404
        • Iowa Juvenile Court Services, District 6
      • Davenport, Iowa, United States, 52801
        • Iowa Juvenile Court Services, District 7
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50310
        • Iowa Juvenile Court Services, District 5
      • Sioux City, Iowa, United States, 51101
        • Iowa Juvenile Court Services, District 3
      • Waterloo, Iowa, United States, 50704
        • Iowa Juvenile Court Services, District 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Juvenile offenders:

  • Score in the moderate- to high-risk range on the short-form Iowa Delinquency Assessment
  • Age 13 to 17 at the time of recruitment
  • Able to understand and read English

Probation officers:

  • Employed by Iowa Juvenile Court Services
  • Work with moderate- to high-risk youth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RAYS intervention
In addition to standard care, participants receive three monthly online RAYS sessions, each followed by a one-on-one discussion with the probation officer
The Rise Above Your Situation program (RAYS) is a multimedia computer-tailored intervention that relies on the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM) and expert system technology to deliver assessments, feedback, printed reports, and helpgiver reports with intervention ideas. Helpgivers (probation officers in this case) use the reports to guide 1/2 hour follow-up discussions to reinforce intervention ideas and provide support.
No Intervention: Standard care
Participants receive standard care from the probation officer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Criminal recidivism based on self-report
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Assessed using the General Crime Scale (GCS) of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)
12 months follow-up
Criminal recidivism based on official records
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Data will be provided by the Iowa Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP)
12 months follow-up
Substance use abstinence based on self-report
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Among youth who screened positive for substance abuse and/or dependence at baseline, assessed using the Substance Frequency Scale (SFS) from the GAIN
12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total count of criminal behavior based on self-report
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Assessed using the General Crime Scale (GCS) of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)
12 months follow-up
Stage of change for staying out of trouble with the law
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Assessed using a self-report Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM) stage of change measure developed by the PI
12 months follow-up
Emotional distress
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Assessed using the 5-item Internalizing Disorder Screener (IDScr) of the GAIN Short Screener
12 months follow-up
Substance use frequency
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Among youth who screened positive for substance abuse and/or dependence at baseline, assessed using the Substance Frequency Scale (SFS) from the GAIN
12 months follow-up
Substance-related problems
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Among youth who screened positive for substance abuse and/or dependence at baseline, assessed using the Substance Problem Scale (SPS) from the GAIN
12 months follow-up
Stage of change for quitting alcohol and drugs
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Among youth who screened positive for substance abuse and/or dependence at baseline, assessed using a self-report Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM) stage of change measure developed by the PI
12 months follow-up
Abstinence confirmed by urine drug testing
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Among youth who screened positive for substance abuse and/or dependence at baseline
12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Abuse

Clinical Trials on RAYS Intervention

3
Subscribe