Multi-Center Trial of High-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound Versus Standard Low-resolution Transrectal Ultrasound for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

February 6, 2019 updated by: Exact Imaging

This trial uses a ultra high-resolution ultrasound system and specialized transducer, intended for use in prostate imaging. The system's image resolution is significantly better than the standard of care, due to its higher frequency. This allows the system to visualize suspicious areas and structures, and for greater accuracy for guided biopsy.

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that ultra high-resolution transrectal ultrasound (UHR-TRUS) is superior to conventional low-resolution transrectal ultrasound (LR-TRUS) in detecting clinically significant cancer among men without known prostate cancer and with an indication for prostate biopsy.

The secondary objective of this study is to compare the difference in the rate of detection of clinically significant cancer between LR-TRUS and UHR-TRUS, from before investigator training to after investigator training.

The tertiary objective for the investigation is to compare the combined sensitivity and specificity in determining cancer detection overall for image-guided biopsy in UHR-TRUS vs. LR-TRUS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a two-arm multi-centre randomized trial of LR-TRUS versus UHR-TRUS for guided prostate biopsies in men with no known history of prostate cancer. This trial will enroll a minimum of 800 and a maximum of 2000 patients with regular interim analyses to determine the trial's final sample size. These numbers are based on predictive probabilities of trial success.

The investigation is designed as a comparative non-blinded analysis of LR-TRUS vs. UHR-TRUS. Participants will be randomized to either high-resolution or low resolution ultrasound with an equal chance of being in either group. The randomization scheme will be stratified by centre.

When a subject arrives at the institution for his biopsy, the Study Coordinator opens a sealed envelope that indicates to the study participant and physician whether the procedure will be performed using LR-TRUS or UHR-TRUS.

All subjects have an indication for prostate biopsy, and thus, inclusion of a non-treatment group would necessitate a group of men not to receive standard of care. As such, there is no control group in the subject population.

Procedures in the study are:

  • obtaining informed consent for the subject
  • collecting pre-biopsy information and recording it on the case report form (CRF)
  • perform biopsy procedure
  • record biopsy details in CRF
  • prepare biopsy specimens for pathology

Data from CRFs will be stored in a proprietary database that is accessed by a web-based interface, where access is limited to those with login and password. No subject-identifiable information will be entered in the database.

The primary endpoint is the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, i.e., the number of men with clinically significant prostate cancer determined by pathology review among all men randomized and biopsied. Pathological analysis on 12-core biopsy samples will be the only mechanism used to determine if study subjects have prostate cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1676

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2V 1P9
        • Prostate Cancer Centre
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    • Quebec
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, G1R 2J6
        • Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer ("CRCEO")
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Brady Urological Institution
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23452
        • Urology of Virgina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All men > 40 years age and <80 years of age with an indication for a prostate biopsy will be offered inclusion in the study. Typical indications for biopsy include abnormal PSA (prostate specific antigen) and/or abnormal DRE (digital rectal exam).
  • PSA<50
  • Clinical stage < cT3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men with a history of prostate cancer
  • Men undergoing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in the OR under anesthesia
  • Men with known prostate volume (from prior imaging) of > 60cc
  • Men with anorectal abnormalities preventing TRUS-guided prostate biopsy
  • Men who are unable to provide their own informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LR-TRUS
Low-resolution transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (standard of care)
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using standard of care ultrasound system
Experimental: UHR-TRUS
Ultra-high resolution transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
Ultrasound guided prostate biopsy using ultra-high resolution ultrasound system
Other Names:
  • ImagistxProstate Urology Ultrasound System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Time Frame: First visit (a patient's involvement in the trial is complete following his biopsy).
Pathology analysis of prostate biopsy is reviewed for indication of clinically significant prostate cancer. Interim analyses are planned beginning when 800 patients have been enrolled and after every additional 200 patients are enrolled up to the maximum sample size of 2000 patients.
First visit (a patient's involvement in the trial is complete following his biopsy).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of an Investigator's Ability to Detect Clinically Significant Cancer Using UHR-TRUS Post-training When Compared to Pre-training
Time Frame: Pre-training refers to all biopsy procedures occurring between initial training and mid-trial PRI-MUS training. Post-training refers to all biopsy procedures performed after mid-trial PRI-MUS training.
Comparison of pre- and post-training percentage of participants found to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer within the UHR-TRUS arm of the trial
Pre-training refers to all biopsy procedures occurring between initial training and mid-trial PRI-MUS training. Post-training refers to all biopsy procedures performed after mid-trial PRI-MUS training.
Combined Sensitivity and Specificity in Determining Cancer Detection Overall for Image-guided Biopsy
Time Frame: First visit (a patient's involvement in the trial is complete following his biopsy).
Pathology analysis of prostate biopsy is reviewed. Sensitivity of targeted biopsy for each arm will be calculated as the number of targeted biopsy that also found cancer among all targeted biopsies. Specificity of targeted biopsy for each arm will be calculated as the number of non-targeted biopsies that find no cancer among all non-targeted biopsies. Interim analyses are planned beginning when 800 patients have been enrolled and after every additional 200 patients are enrolled up to the maximum sample size of 2000 patients.
First visit (a patient's involvement in the trial is complete following his biopsy).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Standard ultrasound guided prostate biopsy

Subscribe