Toronto BNB Pilot Study

February 7, 2017 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Pilot Study of the Toronto Brief Neurocognitive Battery (BNB)

As treatments improve and patients live longer with cancer, even after it has spread to the brain, efforts to improve quality of life are growing. Neurocognitive function (thinking ability and memory) is an area of particular concern for patients with brain metastases (cancer that can spread to the brain). Although there are established tests to measure neurocognitive function, these require a face-to-face assessment and can take a long time to complete. As a result, efforts to use these tests to measure changes in neurocognitive function in patients following treatment for brain metastases have resulted in a large proportion of patients who do not return for follow-up. This has limited the ability to evaluate the impact of current treatments on neurocognitive function. This study aims to evaluate a shorter, telephone-based neurocognitive assessment tool, which would make it easier for patients to complete these tests in follow-up. If this new tool is found to reliably measure neurocognitive function, it could be used for future studies evaluating new interventions that prevent or treat neurocognitive deterioration following treatment of brain metastases. This is the first prospective study to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of a novel telephone-based brief neurocognitive assessment battery (Toronto BNB) compared with the same battery delivered face-to-face in this population. The investigators hypothesize that telephone administration of this brief neurocognitive battery will reliably evaluate neurocognitive function and improve patient ability to complete follow-up assessments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L3Y2P9
        • Southlake Regional Health Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2M9
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N3M5
        • Sunnybrook Hospital - Odette Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases planned for whole brain radiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (> 18 years old) with newly diagnosed brain metastases planned for whole brain radiotherapy
  • Performance status ECOG 0-2
  • English-speaking (due to small sample-size in this pilot study, only English testing will be completed)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior whole brain radiotherapy
  • Presence of any condition which can prevent completion of neurocognitive assessment, including:
  • Hearing impairment which is sufficient to prevent the patient from comprehending English instructions in a quiet environment
  • Major psychiatric diagnosis or neurological condition associated with cognitive impairment which, in the judgement of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for study participation (e.g., schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, prior ischemic stroke, dementia, traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness for greater than 30 minutes, expressive/receptive aphasia, developmental delay)
  • Patients with planned systemic therapy or additional radiotherapy within the interval between clinic and telephone Toronto BNB testing
  • Minimal English skills such that subjects would be unable to follow simple English instructions (either verbal or written) or be unable to read questionnaires of a grade 8 standard with the help of a research assistant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
QOL Assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate feasibility of utilizing a telephone assessment in patients with brain metastases
Time Frame: 1.5 years
The telephone-based tool will be considered feasible if the proportion of participants who complete baseline and follow-up telephone-based assessments is the same as or greater than the proportion of participants who complete the in-clinic assessments.
1.5 years
Evaluate the interprocedure (telephone vs. clinic) reliability
Time Frame: 1.5 years
Cronbach's alpha coefficient at each time point (baseline, 1 month, 4 months) will be calculated to assess the following z scores: Patient results from individual neurocognitive tests will be converted to a z score (the number of standard deviations above or below the mean). Overall averaged global z scores will be compared between the telephone and clinic assessments using the Toronto BNB. Cronbach's alpha coefficient will be evaluated as follows: 0-0.2 poor agreement; 0.3-0.4 fair agreement; 0.5-0.6 moderate agreement; 0.7-0.8 strong agreement; >0.8 very strong agreement.
1.5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the change in neurocognitive function before and after WBRT using the Toronto BNB
Time Frame: 1.5 years
Paired t-tests will be used to assess whether any statistically significant change is observed between neurocognitive scores obtained at 1 month and 4 months after WBRT as compared to baseline (before WBRT)
1.5 years
Evaluate sensitivity to change (responsiveness) of the Toronto BNB (in clinic and by telephone)
Time Frame: 1.5 years
Paired t-tests will be used to assess whether any statistically significant change is observed between 1 month and 4 months using the BNB obtained in clinic and then using the BNB obtained over the phone.
1.5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Caroline Chung, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 2, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases

3
Subscribe