Objective Assessment of Upper Extremity Functioning of Stroke Patients Before and After Rehabilitation (AssStrFunc)

July 7, 2015 updated by: Carmeli Eli
The purpose of this study is to evaluate by objective measures the improvement in upper extremity functioning, as reflection of motor learning, in stroke patients in the sub acute phase. The investigators hypothesize that the improvements in daily functioning are partially due to compensation strategies and partially due to motor learning.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Most stroke patients continue to suffer from upper extremity motor deficiencies even after prolonged and intense rehabilitation in hospital. Even though guidelines and other studies recommend to apply a rehabilitation programs as patient reception. As opposed to that there is a scarce evidence for the efficacy of the rehabilitation.

Objectives: To evaluate by objective measures the improvement in motor performance of the upper extremity of stroke patients in the sub acute period. Secondary objective is to describe the correlation between proximal and distal motor deficiencies of the upper extremity.

Hypothesis: Patients will show better hand performance at the end of hospitalization. Part of it can be attributed to the rehabilitation and part to a spontaneous recovery. Correlation will be found for proximal and distal upper extremity motor deficiencies.

Methods:

Trial began only after the IRB research approval. All treatment sessions will implemented by the physical and occupational staff of the hospital. Assessments for the measures will be carry out by a certified physical therapist which is coinvestigator. The coinvestigator collect the raw data for analysis in Excel and than in SPSS.

20 stroke patients who meet the inclusion criteria will participate in the study, after signing an informed consent.Patients will undergo the first assessment of all measures, e.g: motor abilities by Fugl-Meyer test, handwriting kinematic and kinetic measures and surface electromyography for measurement of muscle synergy.Patients will be treated by standard rehabilitation of physical and occupational therapy for a period of 3-4 weeks. Before discharge from hospital patients will undergo another assessment of all measures, in order to evaluate the progression in their upper limb motor abilities from reception. Part of the patients will be assessed again two to three weeks after discharge as follow up.

Outcome Measures: upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment, handwriting Air-time, pressure and velocity, EMG (i.e., muscle onset, muscle amplitude, muscle co-activation ratio).

Statistical analysis: ANOVA analysis will be used to measure time effect. Correlation between measures will be measured by Pearson's correlation. Sample size (n=20) was calculated based on 5 points improvement in Fugl-Meyer test as minimal significant change with power of 0.8 and p-level under 0.05 for significance.

Key words: Stroke, Muscle synergy, Handwriting, Fugl-Meyer

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel, 31021
        • Fliman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cohort will be selected from Fliman Rehabilitation Geriatric Center. Healthy subjects, age and gender-matched will be served as a control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of cerebral stroke with upper extremity hemiparesis
  • Ability to understand simple orders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other orthopedic pathology
  • Apraxia
  • Bilateral Paresis
  • Other neurologic pathology
  • sensory aphasia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Stroke
Stroke patients at the subacute phase
task-oriented therapy: physical and occupational therapy emphasizing integration of the patients needs, environment and context
Healthy controls
healthy age-matched voluntiers
no treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment.
Time Frame: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
zero to 66 points scale, measuring the impairment level of the upper extremity. Zero indicates a high level of impairment or minimum hand motor function, while 66 points indicates an increased motor function which is similar to normal upper extremity function.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
Muscle Onset Time.
Time Frame: the study group was assessed T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later. The control group assessed for the the time onset and compared to the study group at T1
Assessed by surface electromyography device. The time period it takes the muscle to be activated and contract from a voice prompting is measured. Shorter time onset probably charcterized healthy people compared to patients after a stroke.
the study group was assessed T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later. The control group assessed for the the time onset and compared to the study group at T1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle Co-activation Index.
Time Frame: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
Assessed by surface electromyography device. Indicate for the level by which muscles contract at the same time and amplitude. It will be calculated in percentage from 100%, as 100% indicate for complete co-activation between a pair of muscles.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
Handwriting Velocity
Time Frame: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later.
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET. Patient make writing tasks. The velocity of his writing is measured and pass from the tablet to the computer to be processed by the software.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later.
% Maximum Voluntary Contraction.
Time Frame: The outcome will be measured twice. First at the beginning of the hospital stay and again at the end of the hospital stay, that is 4 weeks on average.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
The outcome will be measured twice. First at the beginning of the hospital stay and again at the end of the hospital stay, that is 4 weeks on average.
Handwriting Pressure.
Time Frame: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET. Patient make writing tasks, and the pressure exerted with the pen on the tablet is recorded. The data from the tablet passed to the computer to be processed by the software.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
Handwriting Off-paper Time.
Time Frame: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET. Patient make writing tasks. The time the pen is on air is measured. The data from the tablet passed to the computer to be processed by the software.
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emanuel Markovich, MD, Fliman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center
  • Study Director: Sharon Israely, MSc., University of Haifa
  • Study Chair: Eli Carmeli, PhD., University of Hifa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on stroke

Subscribe