Objective Assessment of Upper Extremity Functioning of Stroke Patients Before and After Rehabilitation (AssStrFunc)
Přehled studie
Detailní popis
Background: Most stroke patients continue to suffer from upper extremity motor deficiencies even after prolonged and intense rehabilitation in hospital. Even though guidelines and other studies recommend to apply a rehabilitation programs as patient reception. As opposed to that there is a scarce evidence for the efficacy of the rehabilitation.
Objectives: To evaluate by objective measures the improvement in motor performance of the upper extremity of stroke patients in the sub acute period. Secondary objective is to describe the correlation between proximal and distal motor deficiencies of the upper extremity.
Hypothesis: Patients will show better hand performance at the end of hospitalization. Part of it can be attributed to the rehabilitation and part to a spontaneous recovery. Correlation will be found for proximal and distal upper extremity motor deficiencies.
Methods:
Trial began only after the IRB research approval. All treatment sessions will implemented by the physical and occupational staff of the hospital. Assessments for the measures will be carry out by a certified physical therapist which is coinvestigator. The coinvestigator collect the raw data for analysis in Excel and than in SPSS.
20 stroke patients who meet the inclusion criteria will participate in the study, after signing an informed consent.Patients will undergo the first assessment of all measures, e.g: motor abilities by Fugl-Meyer test, handwriting kinematic and kinetic measures and surface electromyography for measurement of muscle synergy.Patients will be treated by standard rehabilitation of physical and occupational therapy for a period of 3-4 weeks. Before discharge from hospital patients will undergo another assessment of all measures, in order to evaluate the progression in their upper limb motor abilities from reception. Part of the patients will be assessed again two to three weeks after discharge as follow up.
Outcome Measures: upper limb Fugl-Meyer assessment, handwriting Air-time, pressure and velocity, EMG (i.e., muscle onset, muscle amplitude, muscle co-activation ratio).
Statistical analysis: ANOVA analysis will be used to measure time effect. Correlation between measures will be measured by Pearson's correlation. Sample size (n=20) was calculated based on 5 points improvement in Fugl-Meyer test as minimal significant change with power of 0.8 and p-level under 0.05 for significance.
Key words: Stroke, Muscle synergy, Handwriting, Fugl-Meyer
Typ studie
Zápis (Aktuální)
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Haifa, Izrael, 31021
- Fliman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Metoda odběru vzorků
Studijní populace
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of cerebral stroke with upper extremity hemiparesis
- Ability to understand simple orders
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other orthopedic pathology
- Apraxia
- Bilateral Paresis
- Other neurologic pathology
- sensory aphasia
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
Kohorty a intervence
Skupina / kohorta |
Intervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Stroke
Stroke patients at the subacute phase
|
task-oriented therapy: physical and occupational therapy emphasizing integration of the patients needs, environment and context
|
|
Healthy controls
healthy age-matched voluntiers
|
no treatment
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment.
Časové okno: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
|
zero to 66 points scale, measuring the impairment level of the upper extremity.
Zero indicates a high level of impairment or minimum hand motor function, while 66 points indicates an increased motor function which is similar to normal upper extremity function.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
|
|
Muscle Onset Time.
Časové okno: the study group was assessed T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later. The control group assessed for the the time onset and compared to the study group at T1
|
Assessed by surface electromyography device.
The time period it takes the muscle to be activated and contract from a voice prompting is measured.
Shorter time onset probably charcterized healthy people compared to patients after a stroke.
|
the study group was assessed T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later. The control group assessed for the the time onset and compared to the study group at T1
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle Co-activation Index.
Časové okno: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
|
Assessed by surface electromyography device.
Indicate for the level by which muscles contract at the same time and amplitude.
It will be calculated in percentage from 100%, as 100% indicate for complete co-activation between a pair of muscles.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
|
|
Handwriting Velocity
Časové okno: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later.
|
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET.
Patient make writing tasks.
The velocity of his writing is measured and pass from the tablet to the computer to be processed by the software.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and follow up at T2 one month later.
|
|
% Maximum Voluntary Contraction.
Časové okno: The outcome will be measured twice. First at the beginning of the hospital stay and again at the end of the hospital stay, that is 4 weeks on average.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one month later.
|
The outcome will be measured twice. First at the beginning of the hospital stay and again at the end of the hospital stay, that is 4 weeks on average.
|
|
Handwriting Pressure.
Časové okno: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
|
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET.
Patient make writing tasks, and the pressure exerted with the pen on the tablet is recorded.
The data from the tablet passed to the computer to be processed by the software.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
|
|
Handwriting Off-paper Time.
Časové okno: T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
|
Assessed by electronic tablet with specific software called ComPET.
Patient make writing tasks.
The time the pen is on air is measured.
The data from the tablet passed to the computer to be processed by the software.
|
T1 at the beginning of the hospital stay and folloew up at T2 one mont...
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Vyšetřovatelé
- Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Emanuel Markovich, MD, Fliman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center
- Ředitel studie: Sharon Israely, MSc., University of Haifa
- Studijní židle: Eli Carmeli, PhD., University of Hifa
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Odhad)
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Odhad)
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- UHai920130001
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .