Acute Stroke: Prehospital Versus In-HospitAL Initiation of Recanalization Therapy- ASPHALT (ASPHALT)

January 31, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier St Anne

Prehospital Initiation of Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Randomized Medico-economic Evaluation of a Mobile Stroke Unit.

ASPHALT is an academic-driven open-label randomized controlled trial of Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) deployment versus standard care in France, with blinded assessment of efficacy endpoints. 450 patients with confirmed acute ischemic stroke will be recruited over a 3-year period, with 3-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Instead of the traditional approach of waiting until the patient arrives at the hospital to perform brain imaging and start reperfusion therapies, mobile stroke units (MSUs; ambulances equipped with a CT scanner) now allow pre-hospital initiation of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Two large non-randomized clinical trials (B_PROUD & BEST-MSU) have recently shown that MSU use leads to improved functional outcomes at 3 months in specific settings. However, MSUs have been criticized because of their cost and a lack of evidence of a significant reduction in the time between symptom onset and mechanical thrombectomy, which is the cornerstone of treatment of patients with large vessel occlusion.

We hypothesized that compared to usual care, the deployment of a MSU would result in an incremental cost-utility ratio ≤50,000 euros per QALY in the lifetime horizon, even in an area with many thrombectomy-capable centers..

Academic-driven open-label randomized controlled trial of Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) deployment versus standard care in France, with blinded assessment of efficacy endpoints. Randomization will be performed on an individual patient basis (randomization of MSU deployment at dispatch). 450 patients with confirmed acute ischemic stroke (emergency call ≤6 hours after onset) will be recruited over a 3-year period, with 3-month follow-up. Costs and clinical outcomes will be collected prospectively during the study period and used to extrapolate the incremental cost-utility ratio over a lifetime horizon.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94275
        • Recruiting
        • AP-HP - Hôpital Bicêtre
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Recruiting
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Recruiting
        • GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • AP-HP - Hopital Lariboisiere
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • AP-HP - hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Recruiting
        • SAMU 75 de Paris
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75017
        • Recruiting
        • BSPP, Brigade des Sapeurs-Pompiers de Paris
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75018
      • Paris, France, 75674
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopital Saint Joseph
        • Contact:
          • Mathieu ZUBER, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: +33 (0)1 44 12 34 09
          • Email: mzuber@ghpsj.fr
      • Suresnes, France, 92151

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency call to one of the two following emergency medical service (EMS) dispatch centers : SAMU (Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente) or BSPP (Brigade des Sapeurs Pompiers de Paris), between 08:00 and 18:00, 5 days a week (Monday to Friday).
  • Suspected acute stroke according to a dispatcher stroke identification algorithm, adapted from the ROSIER scale
  • Symptom onset-to-randomization time ≤ 6h
  • Patient located within the predefined catchment area of the MSU
  • MSU available at the time of the EMS call
  • Informed consent (as approved by the ethics committee, informed consent will be obtained after randomization: at the arrival of the MSU (intervention group), or at hospital arrival (control group))

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient confined to be more than 50% of waking hours
  • Unknown or uncertain onset time (e.g. wake-up stroke)
  • Medical history of epilepsy
  • Recent epileptic seizure (<12 hrs)
  • Suspicion of pregnancy
  • Parturient or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient already participating in another interventional study, which could influence the mRS at 3 months.
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient not affiliated to French Social Security

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention (MSU)
Deployment of MSU + conventional ambulance
Deployment of an MSU + conventional ambulance, allowing prehospital CT-scan imaging with intracranial CT angiography. This will allow prehospital intravenous thrombolysis and optimal triage (i.e. accurate identification of patients with large vessel occlusion, who are eligible for mechanical thrombectomy).
Other Names:
  • Mobile Stroke Unit management
No Intervention: Control (usual care)
Deployment of conventional ambulance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR)
Time Frame: 3 months
ICUR in the lifetime horizon, based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
3 months
Key secondary outcome: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months
Time Frame: 90 +/- 14 days
Modified Rankin scale, assessed in a blinded fashion (range, 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 3 indicating moderate disability, and 6 indicating death)
90 +/- 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICUR at 3 months
Time Frame: 90 +/- 14 days
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
90 +/- 14 days
ICUR at 5 years
Time Frame: 5 years
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
5 years
Time from symptom onset to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
Time Frame: up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Time from symptom onset to IVT bolus
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Time from symptom onset to mechanical thrombectomy (MT)
Time Frame: up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Time from symptom onset to arterial puncture
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Time from alarm to IVT
Time Frame: up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Time from ambulance dispatch to IVT bolus
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Time from alarm to MT
Time Frame: up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Time from ambulance dispatch to arterial puncture
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Death within 3 months after randomization
Time Frame: Within 90 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
Within 90 days after randomization
Death within 7 days after randomization
Time Frame: Within 7 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
Within 7 days after randomization
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT
Time Frame: up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Proportion of patient treated with IVT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients with MT
Time Frame: up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Proportion of patient treated with MT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Time Frame: within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Golden hour thrombolysis
within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: Within 36 hours from randomization
ECASS-2 definition
Within 36 hours from randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guillaume TURC, MD, PhD, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences
  • Study Director: Benoît VIVIEN, MD, PhD, APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Necker

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 16, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 16, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) could be available to other researcher aiming to conduct an IPD-meta analysis of studies of MSU vs. usual care (please see access criteria below).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Two years after the last publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered. Data sharing must respect the agreements made with funders. Teams wishing to obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and PI team to present scientific (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and time frame. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractual agreement. Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

Clinical Trials on Mobile Stroke Unit deployment

Subscribe