Commitment and Motivation in a Brief DBT Intervention for Self Harm

February 9, 2017 updated by: Michelle Leybman, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Research suggests that individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) experience low motivation for change (Skodal, Buckley, & Charles, 1983). Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT; Linehan, 1993) includes commitment strategies that are designed to improve motivation. No studies have examined the effectiveness of these strategies. The proposed study will evaluate the efficacy of a brief DBT intervention consisting of commitment strategies plus skills training for people who self-harm. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a single orientation session of (1) commitment strategies plus psychoeducation or (2) psychoeducation. Immediately following their orientation session, all participants will be enrolled in a 90 minute group skills training session. Primary outcomes include autonomous motivation and frequency of self harm behaviours. Assessments will be conducted at six time points: baseline, after the initial orientation session, after the skills training group session, and at one week, one month, and three month follow-up

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Client motivation is related to therapeutic change (Ryan, Lynch, Vansteenkiste, & Deci) and low motivation is a pervasive issue for clients with BPD (e.g., Skodal et al., 1983). DBT (Linehan, 1993) is an effective treatment for BPD and was developed in part to address client motivation. Within DBT there are commitment strategies that are used to help clients establish clear goals and increase motivation to work on them. These strategies were designed to help people commit to eliminating self-harm as well as other behaviours. People are more motivated to work effectively towards goals for which they are autonomously motivated (Deci & Ryan, 2000). Despite their importance in DBT, commitment strategies have never been studied. This study will examine whether commitment strategies are associated with an increase in autonomous motivation and a decrease in self harm behaviour.

This research will address two primary questions: 1) Are commitment strategies associated with an increase in autonomous motivation to decrease self-harm behaviour?; and 2) Does autonomous motivation mediate a relationship between commitment strategies and change in self-harm behaviour? The investigators will also address a secondary question related to predictors of autonomous motivation. Our hypotheses are as follows: 1) The group receiving psychoeducation enhanced with commitment strategies will have higher levels of autonomous motivation compared to the psychoeducation control group; and 2) autonomous motivation will mediate the relationship between commitment strategies and decreases in self harm behaviour. Additionally, autonomy support, low therapist judgment, and goal concordance between client and therapist will independently contribute to predicting client autonomous motivation.

Research in this area is needed in light of the challenges presented by the low motivation that often characterizes individuals with borderline traits who engage in self-harm behaviour. No studies to date have examined DBT's commitment strategies, thus, the effect of these treatment strategies is unknown and needs to be established. Additionally, identifying specific variables that are associated with motivation to eliminate self-harm will help inform the refinement treatment strategies. Finally, few studies have examined the role of autonomous motivation and treatment outcome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 2S1
        • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Has a valid health card issued by a Canadian province or Canadian student organization (ie: UHIP)
  2. Has had at least 3 self-harm episodes (either suicidal or non-suicidal) in the past 5 years, including at least 1 in the past eight weeks
  3. Is literate in English
  4. Absence of 4 or more formal weeks of DBT in the past year (individual or group therapy components)
  5. Indicates absence of knowledge of the DBT Skills
  6. Is able to attend all sessions on scheduled study day

Exclusion Criteria:

1) Evidence of organic brain syndrome or mental retardation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Commitment
A 1-hour orientation session consisting of DBT commitment strategies plus psychoeducation. Therapists will also use commitment strategies to discuss goals related to self-harm. The psychoeducation will consist of information about DBT's biosocial theory and about why people self-harm. All participants will complete a DBT skills training group after their orientation.
Based on Linehan's (1993) manualized DBT approach, the brief DBT skills training group covers will cover five skills: wise mind, TIP skills, distraction, mindfulness of the current emotion, and opposite to emotion action.
Active Comparator: Psychoeducation
A 1-hour orientation session consisting of psychoeducation only. The psychoeducation will consist of information about DBT's biosocial theory and about why people self-harm. All participants will complete a DBT skills training group after their orientation.
Based on Linehan's (1993) manualized DBT approach, the brief DBT skills training group covers will cover five skills: wise mind, TIP skills, distraction, mindfulness of the current emotion, and opposite to emotion action.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Autonomous and Controlled Motivation
Time Frame: From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months)
Autonomous and controlled motivation will be assessed using the Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire (Zuroff et al., 2005).
From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Frequency and severity of self-harm behaviour
Time Frame: From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months)
The frequency and severity of self-harm behaviour will be assessed using the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory, a 17-item self-report questionnaire.
From baseline until 3 months following the completion of the 1-day intervention (i.e., average of 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Leybman, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 070/2013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe