Message: Study of Patients' Perception of Physician's Compassion

July 14, 2016 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

A Trial on Patient's Evaluation of a Physician Conveying Two Different Messages

The goal of this study is to learn what types of conversations patients prefer to have with their doctor about treatment options and how patients view their doctor's compassion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

If participant agree to take part in the study, basic information will be collected (such as date of birth, date of diagnosis, sex, and religion). Participant will also complete questionnaires about any symptoms they may be having, how hopeful they are, how they are accepting the disease, their trust in the medical profession, and how they like information to be delivered to them.

After completing the questionnaires, they will be randomly assigned (as the roll of dice) to one of 4 groups.

Regardless of which group they are in, they will watch 2 short videos that show actors portraying a doctor and patient having a conversation about treatment options in a clinical setting. Both videos will discuss the same material, but the order of the videos and the actors in the videos will be different for each group. Both videos are about 4 minutes long.

After watching each video, the participant will complete 3 questionnaires about the doctor in the video. It should take about 38 minutes to watch both videos and to complete all of the questionnaires.

After they have watched both videos, they will be asked to choose which doctor they preferred and to briefly explain the reasons why they chose that doctor.

Length of Study:

Participant will be off study after they have completed the last questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of advanced cancer, defined as locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease
  2. Patients treated as outpatients by the Supportive and Palliative Care team.
  3. Age >/= 18 years-old
  4. English speaking
  5. Normal cognitive status as determined by the interviewer based on the ability to understand the nature of the study and consent process.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) Patients suffering from a severe psychiatric disorder or condition that would significantly interfere with study participation, as determined by the Principal Investigator or by the attending palliative care physician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1: Video/Doctor Sequence 1
Participants watch two videos with varying video/doctor sequence and complete 3 surveys (one before the first video and one survey after each video)
Watch two short videos with a 4-minute interval between the two of them, estimate 8 minutes to watch both the videos.
One set of surveys before first video and one set after each video played, estimate total of 30 minutes for all surveys.
Other Names:
  • Survey Questionnaires
  • questionnaire
Active Comparator: Group 2: Video/Doctor Sequence 2
Participants watch two videos with varying video/doctor sequence and complete 3 surveys (one before the first video and one survey after each video)
Watch two short videos with a 4-minute interval between the two of them, estimate 8 minutes to watch both the videos.
One set of surveys before first video and one set after each video played, estimate total of 30 minutes for all surveys.
Other Names:
  • Survey Questionnaires
  • questionnaire
Active Comparator: Group 3: Video/Doctor Sequence 3
Participants watch two videos with varying video/doctor sequence and complete 3 surveys (one before the first video and one survey after each video)
Watch two short videos with a 4-minute interval between the two of them, estimate 8 minutes to watch both the videos.
One set of surveys before first video and one set after each video played, estimate total of 30 minutes for all surveys.
Other Names:
  • Survey Questionnaires
  • questionnaire
Active Comparator: Group 4: Video/Doctor Sequence 4
Participants watch two videos with varying video/doctor sequence and complete 3 surveys (one before the first video and one survey after each video)
Watch two short videos with a 4-minute interval between the two of them, estimate 8 minutes to watch both the videos.
One set of surveys before first video and one set after each video played, estimate total of 30 minutes for all surveys.
Other Names:
  • Survey Questionnaires
  • questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant's Rating of Physician's Compassion
Time Frame: Approximately 38 minutes for video viewing and surveys.
Physician compassion tested using compassion data from the first video viewed by each patient as assessed by a Physician Compassion Assessment survey. Patient's rating of physician's compassion by using a 5-item tool consisting of five 0-10 numerical rating scales assessing five dimensions: warm-cold, pleasant-unpleasant, compassionate-distant, sensitive insensitive, caring-uncaring. The sum of the five scales will give a final score representing physician's compassion with a 0 to 50 scale.
Approximately 38 minutes for video viewing and surveys.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kimberson C. Tanco, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-0113
  • NCI-2015-01419 (Registry Identifier: NCI CTRP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe