HIV/AIDS Orphaned and Vulnerable Children Public Health Evaluation (PHE)

March 10, 2017 updated by: Tonya Renee Thurman, Tulane University School of Social Work

The Effectiveness of Two Promising Interventions for Reducing HIV Risk and Improving the Wellbeing of Orphaned and Vulnerable Adolescents in the Eastern Cape of South Africa

The PHE study is a two-year longitudinal study evaluating two interventions for reducing depression and HIV risk behaviors among highly vulnerable adolescents in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. Research suggests that children affected by AIDS are at heightened risk of HIV infection relative to their peers; however, evidence on how best to address HIV prevention and psychological health among this population is lacking. This study examines the efficacy of both a psychological and behavioral intervention, alone and in combination, on related outcomes among vulnerable youth age 14-17. A mixed methods approach is applied, including a community-randomized controlled trial with a factorial design, a cost-effectiveness analysis, and a qualitative component. At baseline data collection in January 2012, more than 1000 adolescents and their caregivers were interviewed; these participants were invited to take part in two more survey rounds designed to examine both the immediate and long term effects of the interventions. Support for this research was provided by USAID under Grant No. GHH-I-00-007-00069-00.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will apply a mixed-methods approach involving two primary components: 1) an impact evaluation using a community-randomized controlled trial (CRCT); and 2) a detailed analysis of intervention costs, linked to the impact evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

For the CRCT, sixty World Vision drop-in centers which deliver standard care were randomly assigned to one of four study conditions: IPTG, Vhutshilo, IPTG+Vhutshilo, and control. Approximately 1600 adolescent OVC aged 14-17 years (current beneficiaries at the drop-in centers) and their caregivers were eligible to participate in the study at baseline.

Participants were visited three times including the baseline survey. Follow-up data collection was conducted in two rounds. The first round took place 8 months after the baseline survey and immediately following intervention exposure. A second follow-up round took place a year later, allowing assessment of both the immediate and longer-term impact of the interventions.

Participants were interviewed at home in Xhosa or Sesotho. Caregivers in the sample completed face-to-face interviews with trained interviewers, while adolescents complete surveys used a mix of face-to-face interviewing and audio computer-assisted self-interview technology (ACASI).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 14-17 years old as of January 1, 2012;
  • Enrolled in a selected World Vision site;
  • Willing and able to assent to study participation; and
  • Consent given by the parent or guardian for the adolescent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are not able to give informed assent due to known or recognizable cognitive or psychiatric impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No Intervention
No intervention
Experimental: Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Groups (IPTG)
The intervention consists of 16 weekly 60 to 90 minute psychotherapy sessions, implemented once a week by a trained lay facilitator.
Interpersonal psychotherapy is a theory- and evidence-based treatment approach for depression developed by clinicians. World Vision has helped to pioneer the use of this model in sub-Saharan Africa including adapting the model for use with OVC within South Africa. Sessions are designed to provide participants with opportunities to learn and practice interpersonal skills for solving problems that bring about depression, and to facilitate the provision of emotional support between members of the group. Groups are implemented by a trained adult facilitator from the community who helps participants to identify people who are important in their lives, understand links between their psychological state and current problems, and practice new ways of problem-solving.
Experimental: Vhutshilo 2
The intervention consists of 13 group sessions, implemented once a week by a trained lay facilitator.
The Vhutshilo 2 model was developed in 2008 by the Centre for the Support of Peer Education (CSPE), a branch of the South African non-profit organization Health and Education Training and Technical Assistance Services. The Vhutshilo program was designed specifically for adolescent OVC in South Africa, and attends to risk factors and pathways considered particularly relevant for this population. Topics include finding and giving emotional support; dealing with grief and loss; alcohol and substance abuse; crime and sexual violence; HIV/AIDS; healthy and safe sexual relationships; and transactional sex. In addition to its knowledge component, the program places heavy emphasis on building relevant skills and efficacy.
Experimental: IPTG and Vhutshilo
Participants receive the IPTG intervention first, followed by Vhutshilo 2.
Interpersonal psychotherapy is a theory- and evidence-based treatment approach for depression developed by clinicians. World Vision has helped to pioneer the use of this model in sub-Saharan Africa including adapting the model for use with OVC within South Africa. Sessions are designed to provide participants with opportunities to learn and practice interpersonal skills for solving problems that bring about depression, and to facilitate the provision of emotional support between members of the group. Groups are implemented by a trained adult facilitator from the community who helps participants to identify people who are important in their lives, understand links between their psychological state and current problems, and practice new ways of problem-solving.
The Vhutshilo 2 model was developed in 2008 by the Centre for the Support of Peer Education (CSPE), a branch of the South African non-profit organization Health and Education Training and Technical Assistance Services. The Vhutshilo program was designed specifically for adolescent OVC in South Africa, and attends to risk factors and pathways considered particularly relevant for this population. Topics include finding and giving emotional support; dealing with grief and loss; alcohol and substance abuse; crime and sexual violence; HIV/AIDS; healthy and safe sexual relationships; and transactional sex. In addition to its knowledge component, the program places heavy emphasis on building relevant skills and efficacy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sexual Risk Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of key sexual behaviors including age at sexual debut; the number of sexual partners; and whether condoms were used consistently in the last 6 months.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for children (CES-DC). The response options used for the CES-DC are on a 4-point scale (not at all; a little; some; a lot).
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HIV knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of basic HIV knowledge: 9 items were used to measure general HIV transmission, testing and treatment knowledge. Respondents were asked to agree or disagree with each item. They could also respond with 'don't know'. The first item (testing for HIV) came from the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)'s Asking Young People about Sexual And Reproductive Health (HIV testing). Four items, including transmission by mosquitoes, sharing food, witchcraft, and healthy-looking person with HIV, were from the South African Demographic and Health Survey. Two items were pulled from a previous evaluation of Vhutshilo 2 in South Africa (perinatal transmission, sex with a virgin). Two questions were self-generated to gather knowledge of drug treatment availability and exact location of VCT site.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Condom Knowledge and Attitudes
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of three items assessing condom knowledge and three items assessing condom attitudes. Respondents indicated agree, disagree or don't know for each item. The South Africa DHS provided two condom knowledge items, whether the male condom provides protection from HIV and whether condoms can be washed and reused. The third knowledge item, whether condoms can be used with Vaseline, came from the South Africa and Tanzania project (SATZ) questionnaire. The SATZ questionnaire also provided one of the three items to measure attitudes toward condom use, which is particularly useful for its gendered perspective; the question asks whether it is okay for a girl to suggest condom use to a sexual partner. The other two items assessing attitudes, including embarrassment and trust, are from the Stepping Stone Study men's questionnaire.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Peer Norms
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of three self-generated items with the stem "Many friends your age are…" These items were used to assess peer norms regarding sexual activity, condom use and peer expectations. Respondents indicated agree, disagree or don't know for each item.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of six items adapted from the SATZ Women's Questionnaire. Using a 4-point Likert scale (very low to very high), they ask "what are the chance you would be able…" regarding condom use (3 items) and refusal to have sex (3 items).
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Evidence suggests that social support is a mediator of depression symptom severity. Four items were used to assess social support (friends and people in your life) using the 4-point scale from the CES-DC (not at all; a little, some, a lot). Adolescent self-report of four items adapted from the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL).
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Future Expectations
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of six items assessing future expectations. Participants were asked "what are the chances that you will…" fulfill each of six items (marriage, children, secondary school, long life, manage difficulties, job) on a 4-point Likert scale (very low to very high). The items were based on two scales; one is a self-generated scale used in a previous study of OVC in South Africa by the authors and the other is an adapted subscale of the Social and Health Assessment (SAHA) previously used among South African adolescents.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in Alcohol Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of two items. The SA DHS provided an item to assess alcohol use ever, while frequency of alcohol use (last 6 months) was measured using an item from Transitions study.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in VCT
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self report of two items measuring whether the participant has received an HIV test (ever and last six months) were adapted from Transitions and self-generated respectively.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Change in STI
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self report on of sores on or abnormal discharge from their penis/vagina. Symptoms of an STI was measured with one question modified from Transitions.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demographic Information
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of age. Caregiver report of age, marriage status, education level, and relationship to adolescent. Interviewer observation of race and gender
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent Education
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Current attendance and grade level were measured using items modified from the SA DHS. A self-generated question was used to measure school absenteeism.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of five items measuring health. Self-rated health was measured using question G1.2 of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life-100 instrument (WHOQOL-100). Morbidity, including illnesses common to South Africa was measured using an abbreviated scale from The Young Carers Project South Africa survey.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Traumatic Events
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Adolescent self-report of personal experience with HIV (experience and relationship to someone infected with or deceased from HIV/AIDS); emotional maltreatment in the home; and bullying/social isolation (how often other kids make fun of the youth). Caregiver report of adolescent's contact with parents; parental illness and death (including AIDS-specific verbal autopsy); and household illness and deaths burden in last year (including economic impact)
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Self-rated health and a modified AIDS-specific verbal autopsy
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver Psychological Health
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver self-report of depressive symptomology using the the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression 10 item scale (CESD-10)
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver Social Relationships
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver self-report of items measuring Social support; Caregiving burden for orphans and for ill household members; Perceived community stigma; and monitoring of adolescent behavior.
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver HIV Knowledge, Attitudes and Communication
Time Frame: Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention
Caregiver self-report of items measuring HIV transmission methods; Rejection of major HIV misconceptions; Attitudes towards sex and reproductive health education; and communication with adolescent pertaining to sexuality and HIv
Baseline, 0 months post-intervention, 12 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tonya R Thurman, MPH PhD, Tulane University School of Social Work

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress, Psychological

Clinical Trials on Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Groups (IPTG)

3
Subscribe