Neurobiological Underpinnings of Placebo Response in Depression

April 24, 2026 updated by: Cristina Cusin, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
In summary, the proposed research is novel with respect to design, technology, and its multi-level integration probing psychological and neurobiological constructs assumed to be crucially implicated in placebo response and has significant clinical and research implications for the future. Specifically, the future implications include: 1) identification of biomarkers and biosignatures of placebo responders, 2) new possibilities to understanding and manipulating the system, 3) possibly decreasing or eliminating a major confounder in clinical trials and drug development, and 4) refining treatments with novel drugs that decrease (in clinical trial) or increase (in clinical practice) the placebo response.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this pilot study is to investigate possible dopaminergic mechanisms underlying the placebo response in MDD.

We expect that mesolimbic DA mechanisms implicated in reward anticipation, reinforcement learning, and expectation play a critical role in mediating placebo responses in MDD. A better understanding of the neurobiological basis of placebo has enormous potential on different levels. On a clinical level, the understanding of placebo mechanisms could lead to a number of applications for therapeutic purposes, such as developing drugs that could enhance the effects of a therapeutic relationship or accelerate the onset of action of an antidepressant by manipulating the placebo-related mechanisms, even if the patient is hopeless or severely anhedonic. On a level of clinical trial innovation, if we confirm the role of dopamine in placebo response and we comprehend how the placebo response mechanistically takes place, this could lead to developing new drugs that could block the placebo effects in clinical trial participants and greatly decrease if not eliminate the placebo effect nested even in those subject who are drug responders, therefore increasing the effect size and decreasing the sample size of studies. Moreover if we can identify biosignatures of placebo effect and use them to predict response, we could potentially enrich samples with subjects who are less likely to be placebo responders and again this would result in increased signal detection in a clinical trial. Finally, with this initial study we plan to lay the foundation for other studies to investigate how this dopaminergic circuitry is affected by other treatments, such as psychotherapy, and what are the changes that are similar or different between antidepressants, placebo and specific forms of psychotherapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy or deep brain stimulation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Depression Clinical and Research Program at Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

In addition to fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for MDD, the following conditions must be met for patient eligibility:

  1. Written informed consent
  2. Men or women aged 18 to 60 years old
  3. A score of 16 or greater on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale -32 items (HAM-D- 32)
  4. Continuing to meet criteria for current MDD at baseline and Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI) scores ≤ 3 (i.e. minimally improved or less) from the screen to the baseline visit
  5. Only one failed one prior antidepressant in the current episode or are currently taking an antidepressant as defined by the MGH-ATRQ, in the current episode and are willing to take bupropion or placebo as augmentation, since we are using subjects as their own controls and we are comparing changes within subjects. Subjects with secondary anxiety disorders, like panic, GAD or simple phobia will be allowed, in order to make the population studied more representative of the general population of MDD.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential not using a medically accepted means of contraception.
  2. Serious suicide or homicide risk.
  3. Unstable medical illnesses, any history of seizure disorder.
  4. The following DSM-IV diagnoses: a) organic mental disorders; b) substance use disorders, including alcohol abuse, within the last year; c) psychotic disorders; d) bipolar disorder; e) acute bereavement; f) severe borderline or antisocial personality disorder; g) history of eating disorder unless if in remission for ≥5 years prior to screening and presenting no current electrolyte abnormalities; h) current primary diagnoses of panic disorder, social phobia, PTSD, GAD, or OCD; i) mood congruent or mood incongruent psychotic features.
  5. History of hepatic impairment or congestive heart failure.
  6. Any history of abuse of stimulants or opiates.
  7. Currently taking any exclusionary medications (i.e., antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, stimulants, dopaminergic agents), potential augmenting agents (e.g., T3, SAMe, St. John's Wort, lithium,). Gabapentin and pregabalin are allowed. Patients must have either no antidepressant treatment or stable (for at least 4 weeks prior to screening). No dose changes are allowed during the study. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are excluded. Concomitant use of trazodone (up to 200 mg daily) is allowed. In agreement with patient's treating provider and under clinical monitoring, exclusionary drugs can be tapered and washed out prior to baseline visit.
  8. Any investigational psychotropic drug within the last year.
  9. Subjects who have not responded to two or more antidepressant trials of adequate doses (e.g., fluoxetine 40 mg/day or higher) and duration (e.g., ≥6 weeks) over the past five years according to the ATRQ.
  10. History of inadequate response/poor tolerability to bupropion.
  11. Subjects with medical contraindications to bupropion (e.g., history of seizures, uncontrolled electrolyte imbalance due to eating disorders, etc.) unless stable for 8 weeks prior to screening and there will be no changes during participation in the study.
  12. Any unstable concomitant form of psychotherapy (depression-focused). Concomitant psychotherapy would be allowed if the frequency and the modality have been stable for the 8 weeks prior to screening and there will be no changes during the participation to the study
  13. Receiving or have received during the index episode VNS, ECT or rTMS.
  14. Color-blindness for blue or green (see fMRI task).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Treatment
12.5 % will be randomized to Welbutrin XL in phase 1 of the study.
12.5% of participants will receive Welbutrin XL in phase 1 of the study.
Other Names:
  • Buproprion XL
Active Comparator: Placebo Group
87.5% will be randomized to receive placebo in phase 1 of the study.
87.5% of subjects will be randomized to placebo in phase 1 of the study.
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HAM-D 32
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The HAM-D-32 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) scores can range between 0 and 124, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. Total score was reported here.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impressions
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cristina Cusin, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

September 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014P000889

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Welbutrin XL

Subscribe