Transfusion and Coagulation Management in Trauma Patients After the Introduction of a Coagulation Algorithm

May 11, 2018 updated by: Donat R. Spahn
Comparison of the consumption of blood and coagulation products (packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, fibrinogen, coagulation factor concentrates, coagulation factor XIII, activated factor VII, van Willebrand factor and antifibrinolytics) before and after the introduction of a designated trauma related transfusion and coagulation algorithm.The periods 2005-2007 (before) and 2012-2014 (after) the introduction are reviewed. Two level-1 trauma centers in Switzerland (Hospital Lucerne, University Hospital Zurich) are included in the study. Predicted probability of a massive transfusion by the trauma associated acute hemorrhage score (TASH)is correlated with the actual rate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Trauma is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. After death due to direct craniofacial injury, exsanguination is the next major cause for trauma mortality.

After initial pre-hospital treatment the patient is admitted to the hospital. If multiple injuries are present the patient is transferred to a specialized trauma center.

Besides surgical treatment, the patient needs stabilization of the vital functions by the Anesthesiologist. Due to loss of blood volume, dilution of the circulatory blood volume and pathological activation of coagulation/fibrinolysis, trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC) is initiated. This needs to be treated and avoided whenever possible.

Transfusion of allogeneic blood and coagulation product itself leads to an increased morbidity and mortality. Infectious and immunologic reactions account for that phenomenon.

This led to a paradigm change in the therapy of TIC. In 2009 a new coagulation factor based coagulation algorithm was introduced in the Hospital Lucerne and the University Hospital in Zurich / Switzerland. With the help of point of care coagulation measurement, tailored coagulation factor based coagulation management and avoidance of allogeneic blood products was initiated.

The investigators now want to analyze the impact of the coagulation algorithm by comparing the periods before and after the introduction of the algorithm.

The consumption of blood and coagulation products (packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, fibrinogen, coagulation factor concentrates, coagulation factor XIII, activated factor VII, van Willebrand factor and antifibrinolytics) before and after the introduction of a designated trauma related transfusion and coagulation algorithm will be recorded and compared. The periods 2005-2007 (before) and 2012-2014 (after) the introduction are reviewed. Predicted probability of a massive transfusion by the TASH score (trauma associated acute hemorrhage) is correlated with the actual rate.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lucerne, Switzerland, 6000
        • Lucerne Kantonssital
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital Zürich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All trauma patients with an injury severity score (ISS) >15 treated in University Hospital Zurich or Lucerne hospital during 2005 to 2007 and 2012 to 2014

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male and female trauma patients
  • admitted to the University hospital of Zurich or the Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland
  • injury severity score >= 16
  • time period 2005-2007 and 2012-2014

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incomplete data
  • denial of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Timeframe 2005 - 2007
Data of timeframe 2005 up to 2007 will be included
Timeframe 2012 - 2014
Data of timeframe 2012 up to 2014 will be included

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison the consumption of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets in the treatment period by the Anaesthesist and after 24/48 hours before (2005-2007) and after (2012-2014) launching the coagulation algorithm.
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
The coagulation algorithm was launched in 2010. To show the difference in transfusion and administration of coagulation products prior and after the changes of coagulation algorithm the probability of massive transfusion (TASH Score) will be compared with the actual rate. The TASH Score is the most precise predictive probability of a massive transfusion. Data of approximately 1800 participants will be compared.
up to 48 hours
Comparison of the rate of massive transfusion in reality with the predicted rate (by TASH) score.
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Massive transfusion (>10 units of blood) can be predicted on the base of patient and trauma epidemiology. The investigator compares the actual rate in the institution with the rate predicted by the score.
up to 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the predicted mortality (TRISS/RISC2) with the actual rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days
TRISS is a common Score and is a comparative value for trauma mortality outcome. The investigators want to show the benefit of launched coagulation algorithm in mortality after severe trauma.
up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhage

Subscribe