Effectiveness of Hand/Eyes/Mouth Behavior Management Technique During Local Anesthesia in Preschool Children

July 17, 2017 updated by: Ana María Leyda Menéndez, Cardenal Herrera University

Effectiveness of Hand/Eyes/Mouth Behavior Management Technique in Anxiety, Pain and Behavior Levels During an Inferior Alveolar and Lingual Nerve Block Procedure in Preschool Children: a Randomized Clinical Trial

This will be a randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. The aim of this studio will be to evaluate the effectiveness of "Hands/Eyes/mouth" behavior management technique versus a conventional technique (covering the patient´s vision) during an inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block in preschool children referred for treatment at the School of Dentistry, Cardenal Herrera CEU University (Valencia, Spain). The sample will consist of 52 children from 3 years old to 5 years 11 months old who need dental pulp treatment and/or tooth extraction of primary molars. Preschool children with no history of allergies to Lidocaine or systemic/neurological diseases and who did not take local anesthesia before the study will be include in this research.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children will be randomly allocated to treatment groups (n=26 for each group) according to the technique: 1)"Hands/Eyes/mouth" and 2) Conventional. Anxiety and pain will be evaluated by the Scale of facial Image (EIF) and Wong-Baker Pain Scale, respectively. The cooperation of the patient will be evaluated by behavioral Scale Frank

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Facultad de Odontología. Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preschool children with severe dental caries who need dental pulp treatment and/or tooth extraction of inferior primary molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preschool children with history of allergies to lidocaine (local anesthetic)
  • Preschool children with systemic or neurological diseases
  • Preschool children who have received local dental anesthesia before this study
  • Preschool children who do not understand Spanish or Valencian language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: "hand-eye-mouth" technique
"hand-eye-mouth" (MOB) seeks to focus the patient in performing a sequence of movements in a fun way so that your attention is diverted from the puncture dental needle, also it seeks to the patient does not see the needle. The operator prior to infiltrate local anesthetic teaches the child a "game" to put "the sleepy little water".After explain a first time, the sequence once or twice is repeated until the patient has mastered. We call this test. When we apply the anesthetic, the entire sequence must be repeated as in trials with the same tranquility and in the same tone of the game. The operator will use this technique during the inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block procedure

The needle is inserted laterally to the pterygomandibular pit at its deepest point without noticing any resistance. In children the positioning of the syringe must be perpendicular, between the canine and the first molar on the opposite side and puncture is performed slightly below the occlusal plane. It was initially deposited 2/3 anesthetic carpule solution and then the needle is slightly recede depositing there the remaining third of anesthetic solution.

The application of anesthesia shall be in accordance with the following guidelines:

  1. Topical Anesthetic: Benzocaine 20% (Hurricaine, Clarben Laboratories SA, Madrid, Spain).
  2. Dental Needle: short needles (21mm/30g) (Octoplus, Clarben Laboratories SA, Madrid, Spain)
  3. anesthetic: lidocaine hydrochloride 2% with epinephrine 1: 100,000 (2% XILOCAINE, Dentsply, Spain).
  4. Syringe: carpule syringe-conventional harpoon with suction system.
Other Names:
  • inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block
Active Comparator: Conventional technique
the operator will explain how he/she will do the inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block procedure in phrases appropriates to the child. Then quietly cover the child´s field of view by hand during the inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block

The needle is inserted laterally to the pterygomandibular pit at its deepest point without noticing any resistance. In children the positioning of the syringe must be perpendicular, between the canine and the first molar on the opposite side and puncture is performed slightly below the occlusal plane. It was initially deposited 2/3 anesthetic carpule solution and then the needle is slightly recede depositing there the remaining third of anesthetic solution.

The application of anesthesia shall be in accordance with the following guidelines:

  1. Topical Anesthetic: Benzocaine 20% (Hurricaine, Clarben Laboratories SA, Madrid, Spain).
  2. Dental Needle: short needles (21mm/30g) (Octoplus, Clarben Laboratories SA, Madrid, Spain)
  3. anesthetic: lidocaine hydrochloride 2% with epinephrine 1: 100,000 (2% XILOCAINE, Dentsply, Spain).
  4. Syringe: carpule syringe-conventional harpoon with suction system.
Other Names:
  • inferior alveolar and lingual nerve block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preschool children´s anxiety levels-Facial Image Scale (FIS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The children will be asked to point at which face they felt most like at that moment (row of five faces ranging from very happy to very unhappy-FIS)
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preschool children´s pain levels-Wong Baker Faces Pain Scale
Time Frame: At the end of local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)
The children will be asked to point at which face they felt most like at that moment (row of six faces ranging from very happy-does not hurt to very unhappy-hurt as much as you can imagine)
At the end of local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preschool children´s behavior-Frank behavioral rating Scale
Time Frame: baseline and during the local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)
It will be evaluated children´s behavior (definitely negative, negative,definitely positive, positive)during the local anethesia procedure
baseline and during the local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)
Heart rates
Time Frame: baseline and during the local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)
baseline and during the local anesthesia procedure (2 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marta Ribelles Llop, PhD, Director of Pediatric Dentistry Master. Cardenal Herrera CEU University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AMLUCHBR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe