Lifestyle Scenario Demonstration on Dialysis Modality

Impact of Lifestyle Scenario Demonstration on Patients'Decision-making of Dialysis Modality

Based on real cases, daily life scenarios of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients were shooted and edited into video films, including environment of home dialysis, dietary patterns, water intake, sports mode, daily work, short time of travel and other activities, covering a certain natural day of either peritoneal or hemodialysis and some important time points in the way of life, such as nursing and treatment for common complications of the corresponding dialysis mode. The videos will also show the advantages and disadvantages of the two modes of dialysis. According to their actual living conditions, patients will decide the right dialysis modality that suite them well, thus improving dialysis compliance and psychological adaptability.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Based on real cases, daily life scenarios of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients were shooted and edited into video films, including environment of home dialysis, dietary patterns, water intake, sports mode, daily work, short time of travel and other activities, covering a certain natural day of either peritoneal or hemodialysis and some important time points in the way of life, such as nursing and treatment for common complications of the corresponding dialysis mode. The videos will also show the advantages and disadvantages of the two modes of dialysis. According to their actual living conditions, patients will decide the right dialysis modality that suite them well, thus improving dialysis compliance and psychological adaptability.

By "informed decision score" questionnaire, comparison of two groups of patients on dialysis awareness of the pattern and ratio of patients choosing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis were performed. Dialysis mode conversion rates of the two groups were finally calculated and the correlation between awareness of dialysis modality and conversion rates of dialysis methods was analyzed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

220

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

CKD 5 patients,prepare for dialysis, aged between 18 to 70 years old, male or female,

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CKD(chronic kidney disease) stage 5 patients with replacement therapy indications, age≥ 18 years, ≤70 years
  • without any contraindications of peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age> 70 years or <18 years old
  • contraindications of peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis
  • Patients who cannot be followed well after dialysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control Group
Control Group:perform routine oral education.Both groups were asked to complete kidney disease knowledge questionnaire before education.
Intervention Group
Intervention Group :On the basis of Control Group, watching video demonstration of each type of dialysis. The videos were based on real cases, showing patients with peritoneal and hemodialysis life modes, lasting for 20 minutes respectively for each type of dialysis. Both groups were asked to complete kidney disease knowledge questionnaire before education.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Conversion rates
Time Frame: two years
two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Informed Decision Score
Time Frame: two years
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2ndHarbinMU

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dialysis Mode Life Scenarios

Clinical Trials on watch viedo

3
Subscribe