Making Sense of Dyspnea Assessment (SODA)

May 26, 2020 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Interpreting COPD Dyspnea Change: Sensitivity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Validity of the Dyspnea Management Questionnaire Computer Adaptive Test (DMQ-CAT)

Dyspnea, or uncomfortable labored breathing, is an important patient-reported outcome (PRO). It is the primary and most disabling symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There is a high priority to improve dyspnea PRO assessment and predict exacerbations. Frequent exacerbations are associated with increased disability, decreased quality of life (QOL), and accelerated lung function decline.

Goals: To test the relative sensitivity to change, responsiveness and predictive validity of a comprehensive dyspnea outcome computer adaptive test (CAT) that measures new anxiety and activity avoidance domains and is more efficient to administer than existing dyspnea scales.

Expected Outcomes: Investigators expect to:

  1. begin to transform how dyspnea is assessed;
  2. improve dyspnea symptom management;
  3. impact functional status;
  4. improve QOL;
  5. facilitate the earlier treatment and prevention of exacerbations;
  6. improve COPD prognosis and survival; and
  7. improve COPD healthcare utilization.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Theoretical Background: COPD research and practice has focused predominately on evaluating and treating the sensory component of dyspnea. However, dyspnea (like pain) is a complex symptom with sensory and affective components. Current dyspnea scales are limited in scope by only measuring the sensory component of dyspnea, and have high respondent and data collection burden and/or high measurement error. Only sensory dyspnea to date has been used to classify COPD severity. The DMQ-CAT addresses the limitations of other dyspnea scales by using state-of-the-art item banking method techniques to provide a tailored multidimensional dyspnea assessment using only a minimal number of items. The 71-item DMQ-CAT captures four distinct dyspnea constructs: intensity, anxiety, activity avoidance, and self-efficacy to evaluate outcomes of COPD pharmacologic, pulmonary rehabilitation, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The DMQ-CAT showed evidence of minimal ceiling and floor effects, acceptable Rasch model fit statistics, high internal consistency reliability, good accuracy compared to the total item pool, and good to excellent concurrent and known-groups validity. The relative sensitivity to change, responsiveness, and predictive validity of the DMQ-CAT is not currently known.

Hypotheses: The DMQ-CAT has superior sensitivity to change and responsiveness compared to other widely used COPD dyspnea scales. The DMQ-CAT has superior predictive validity compared to other dyspnea measures to predict acute COPD exacerbation incidence and severity.

Study Design: To achieve Aims 1 and 2, the investigators will use a prospective observational design and a target sample of 110 pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) outpatients with COPD. The investigators will use distribution-based statistics to compare the sensitivity to change of dyspnea instruments including: effect sizes, standardized response means (SRM), standardized error of measurement (SEM), and the percentage of participants exceeding the minimal detectable change (MDC90) from baseline to discharge from PR. The investigators will estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the DMQ-CAT and compare the percentage of participants exceeding MCID thresholds using established MCIDs for dyspnea instruments. For Aim 3, the investigators will use a retrospective observational design to conduct secondary analyses from existing data of 240 patients with COPD. The investigators will use odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC) to compare the predictive validity of different dyspnea measures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

148

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English Speaking
  • Over 40 years of age
  • Physician-diagnosed COPD documented in their clinic notes
  • Have at least one pulmonary function test (PFT) with a pre-bronchodilator or post-bronchodilator ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second divided by the forced vital capacity (FEV1/ FVC) OF < 0.70 and/or evidence of COPD on chest computed tomography (CT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological dysfunction that interferes with their participation in the pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • Are unable to provide informed consent
  • PR participants who are hospitalized during their PR program will be excluded from further evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea Management Questionnaire Computer Adaptive Test (DMQ-CAT)
Time Frame: Through completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program (8 or 12 weeks on average)
DMQ-CAT scales: Intensity, Anxiety, Activity avoidance, Self-efficacy
Through completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program (8 or 12 weeks on average)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna M Norweg, MD, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-02088

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Subscribe