Saline-Controlled Study of nSTRIDE APS for Knee Osteoarthritis (PROGRESS IV)

October 19, 2023 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Saline-Controlled Study of a Single, Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Protein Solution in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) that will evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of Autologous Protein Solution (APS) in patients with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, saline-controlled trial (RCT) that will evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of Autologous Protein Solution (APS) in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee who have not been able to get satisfactory pain relief with prior treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

332

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University Of Alabama
      • Guntersville, Alabama, United States, 35976
        • Avant Research Associates, LLC
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Tucson Orthopaedic Institute, PC
    • California
      • Encinitas, California, United States, 92024
        • CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California at Los Angeles
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Florida
      • Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States, 32561
        • Andrews Research and Education Foundation (AREF)
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
        • Florida Hospital Orthopaedic Institute and Fracture Care Center
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
        • Comprehensive Clinical Trials, Llc
    • Illinois
      • Rockford, Illinois, United States, 61114
        • Orthoillinois, Ltd.
    • Indiana
      • Elkhart, Indiana, United States, 46514
        • Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Center
      • Greenwood, Indiana, United States, 46143
        • OrthoIndy
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Kansas University Medical Center Research Institute, Inc.
    • Massachusetts
      • Foxboro, Massachusetts, United States, 02035
        • Brigham and Women's Mass General Health Care Center
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
        • Northwell Health - Great Neck
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Northwell Health - Lenox Hill
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest School of Medicine
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43221
        • Ohio State University
      • New Albany, Ohio, United States, 43054
        • Joint Implant Surgeons, Inc
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
        • The Campbell Foundation
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Texas Center for Joint Replacement
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
        • University of Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23294
        • OrthoVirginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥ 21 and ≤ 80 years old at the time of screening
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures and visit schedules and ability to follow oral and written instructions
  • A standing radiograph of the knee showing a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 2 to 4 and an absence of severe osteoarthritis
  • Body Mass Index ≤ 40
  • A qualifying WOMAC LK 3.1 pain subscale total score
  • Has undergone at least one prior conservative osteoarthritis treatment
  • Signed an institutional review board approved informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of clinically observed active infection in the index knee
  • Presence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in the non-study knee
  • Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Reiter's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis, or arthritis secondary to other inflammatory diseases; HIV, viral hepatitis; chondrocalcinosis, Paget's disease, or villonodular synovitis
  • Diagnosed with leukemia, known presence of metastatic malignant cells, or ongoing or planned chemotherapeutic treatment
  • Untreated symptomatic injury of the index knee
  • Presence of surgical hardware or other foreign body intended to treat arthritis or cartilage-related pathology in the index knee
  • Previous cartilage repair procedure on the injured cartilage surface of the index knee
  • Arthroplasty or open surgery of the index knee within 6 months of screening
  • Intra-articular steroid injection in the index knee within 3 months of screening
  • Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in the index knee within 6 months of screening
  • Other intra-articular therapy in the index knee within 6 months prior to screening
  • Orally administered systemic steroid use within 2 weeks of screening
  • Planned/anticipated surgery of the index knee during the study period
  • Skin breakdown at the knee where the injection is planned to take place
  • Pregnant or nursing mothers or women planning on getting pregnant during the time they will be participating in the study
  • Participated in any investigational drug or device trial within 30 days prior to screening
  • Participated in any investigational biologic trial within 60 days prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nSTRIDE APS
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
single intra-articular injection
Other Names:
  • Autologous Protein Solution
Other: Saline
Saline control
single intra-articular injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert (LK) 3.1 Pain Subscale Change From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
The primary objective of this study was to determine whether nSTRIDE APS is superior to Saline with respect to the improvement in mean WOMAC Pain score (change from baseline to 12 Months post-injection raw score). The WOMAC pain subscale consisted of five questions scored from 0 to 4. The pain score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximal pain).
Baseline and 12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Change From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
The Visual Analogue Scale is a common tool for measuring general pain. A 100 mm line is marked from 0 to 10 in 10 mm increments. Knee pain severity is indicated by drawing a vertical mark at the point on the line that best represents the severity of pain. No pain is indicated by the 0 at the far left, and the worst possible pain is indicated by the 100 at the far right.
Baseline and 12 Months
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responders
Time Frame: 12 months
The OMERACT-OARSI Responder Criteria were applied to both treatment groups, categorizing each patient into one of two categories: responder and non-responder. Responders were defined as subjects who achieved a high degree of improvement in pain or in function (improvement of ≥50% and absolute change ≥20), or a moderate degree of improvement in 2 of the 3 response domains (pain, function, global assessment).
12 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) LK 3.1 Stiffness Subscale Change From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
The WOMAC stiffness subscale consisted of two questions scored from 0 to 4. The stiffness score has a range of 0 (no stiffness) to 8 (maximal stiffness).
Baseline and 12 Months
EQ-5D Change From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 Months
The EQ-5D is a validated instrument that assesses an individual's current health status and heath related quality of life. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive component assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression over three levels of severity. The EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) assesses the respondent's self-rated overall health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Baseline and 12 Months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Subjects experiencing at least one AE
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederick M Azar, M.D., Campbell Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on nSTRIDE APS

3
Subscribe