Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Diabetes Mellitus Patients (COMBINE)

August 30, 2021 updated by: Diagram B.V.

Combined Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Hemodynamic Assessment of Non-Culprit Lesions to Better Predict Adverse Event Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients. COMBINE (OCT-FFR) Prospective Register

Title:

Combined Optical Coherence Tomography Morphologic and Fractional Flow Reserve Hemodynamic Assessment of Non-Culprit Lesions to Better Predict Adverse Event Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients COMBINE (OCT-FFR) Prospective Register

To study the natural evolution of patients with at least one intermediate angiographic but non-hemodynamic significant stenotic lesion, in two subgroups of patients, with TCFA vs. no TCFA as detected by OCT imaging and to compare these two groups of patients with each other as well as to a subset of patients with FFR-positive and PCI-treated intermediate lesions on future MACE.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions remain at risk for future MACE events, including those patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR) negative lesions. Use of FFR measurements combined with Optimal Coherence Tomography (OCT) detection of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) in will help predict future MACE rates.

Objective To study the natural evolution of patients with at least one intermediate angiographic but non-hemodynamic significant stenotic lesion, in two subgroups of patients, with TCFA vs. no TCFA as detected by OCT imaging and to compare these two groups of patients with each other as well as to a subset of patients with FFR-positive and PCI-treated intermediate lesions on future MACE.

Design Prospective, open label natural history registry. DM patients bearing target lesions {Any de novo lesion with an angiographic visual estimation of ≥ 40%- ≤ 80% Diameter Stenosis (DS) that is located in a non-grafted coronary segment. In patients with an MI at presentation the target lesion should be different from the culprit lesion} and have undergone FFR and OCT imaging as for clinical routine will be prospectively enrolled and followed. Patients with negative FFR (> 0.80) will be divided in two categories depending on corelab OCT imaging findings: No-TCFA (cap thickness >65µ) (Group A) or TCFA (cap thickness ≤ 65µ) (group B). All patients that had a positive FFR and therefore have been treated with PCI as per standard care in all target lesions will also be followed (group C), however if after the PCI there is at least one remaining target lesion where FFR was negative these patients should be followed in group A or B depending on the OCT findings. Clinical endpoints at 1.5 year will be recorded.

The investigators strongly recommend that all major epicardial coronary vessels of stentable size that show any form of atherosclerosis to be interrogated with FFR and OCT.

The investigators strongly recommend to not perform cap thickness measurements in the cathlab. The plaque cap thickness as measured in the corelab will not be disclosed to operators and patients.

Population Patients aged ≥18 years Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with any presentation. Coronary angiography, FFR and OCT imaging in at least one coronary de novo stenosis in a native vessel with a visually estimated diameter of stenosis (DS) of ≥ 40%-≤ 80% (target lesion).

Angiographic criteria target lesion:

(i) ≥ 40%-≤ 80% diameter stenosis (DS) (ii) de novo lesion located in native non-grafted vessel (iii) target lesion reference diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm (iv) TIMI 3 flow

Primary Endpoint The per patient incidence of the target lesion(s) related composite MACE defined as Cardiac Death, MI, clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation or hospitalization due to unstable or progressive angina at 18 months in the FFR-negative No-TCFA (Group A) and FFR-negative TCFA (Group B).

Statistics This is an observational study (prospective natural history register) where no randomization takes place, therefore a power calculation is strictly not necessary.

However, in order to observe meaningful differences between groups (as described in the design) and deduct founded conclusions, the minimal number of patients required was calculated as follows. The target lesion related primary endpoint at 18 months in the A and B group respectively are assumed to be 5 % and 20% respectively. Taking into account an expected loss in FU of 7%, a total of 500 patients enrolled in the study will provide 80% power to reject the null hypothesis with 5% type I error (alpha). The enrolment in group C will stop after the first 166 patients have been enrolled in this group. The rest of the rest of 334 patients will be distributed in groups A and B depending on the OCT corelab findings. Nul hypothesis: the MACE rate in group B is not different from group A.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

550

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Overijssel
      • Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands, 8025 AB
        • Isala

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The COMBINE (OCT-FFR) Trial is an investigator driven study: a prospective natural history registry. Patients aged ≥ 18 years bearing target lesions (see definition section) that fulfil the inclusion criteria and have undergone FFR and OCT imaging as per clinical practice will be enrolled in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. History of DM with any indication for angiography (Stable Angina (SA) or any type of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including ST-Elevation MI).
  3. Coronary angiography, including FFR and OCT imaging of at least one coronary de novo stenosis in a native not-grafted vessel with a visually estimated diameter stenosis (DS) of ≥ 40 - ≤ 80% (target lesion) . Target lesion should be other than the culprit lesion(s) in patients presenting with MI (STEMI or non-STEMI).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. TIMI flow < 3 in the target lesion(s)
  2. Target lesion reference diameter (on visual estimation) < 2.0 mm
  3. Known left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  4. Known malignancy
  5. Life expectancy < 2 years
  6. Unwilling or unable to provide inform consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group A
Patients with negative FFR (> 0.80) in the target lesion & decided on OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) imaging findings with NO thin-cap fibroatheroma
Patients aged ≥ 18 years bearing target lesions that fulfil the inclusion criteria and have undergone FFR and OCT imaging as per clinical practice will be enrolled in the study.
Other Names:
  • OCT
Group B
Patients with negative FFR (> 0.80) in the target lesion & decided on OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) imaging findings presence of ≥ thin-cap fibroatheroma
Patients aged ≥ 18 years bearing target lesions that fulfil the inclusion criteria and have undergone FFR and OCT imaging as per clinical practice will be enrolled in the study.
Other Names:
  • OCT
Group C
Patients hosting FFR-positive target lesions that have been treated with PCI as per standard care and have further no TCFA lesions.
Patients aged ≥ 18 years bearing target lesions that fulfil the inclusion criteria and have undergone FFR and OCT imaging as per clinical practice will be enrolled in the study.
Other Names:
  • OCT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The per patient incidence of the target lesion(s) related composite MACE
Time Frame: 18 months after procedure
The per patient incidence of the target lesion(s) related composite MACE defined as Cardiac Death, MI, clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation or hospitalization due to unstable or progressive angina at 18 months in the FFR-negative No-TCFA (Group A) and FFR-negative TCFA (Group B).
18 months after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The per patient incidence of the target lesion(s) related composite MACE:
Time Frame: 18 months after procedure
Cardicac death, MI, clinically- driven revascularization or hospitalization due to unstable or progressive angina between FFR-negative TCFA (Group B) and the group of patients with PCI-treated FFR-positive lesions (Group C).
18 months after procedure
The per patient incidence composite MACE
Time Frame: 18 months after procedure
The per patient incidence composite MACE: Cardiac death, MI, any clinically driven-revascularization or hospitalization due to unstable or progressive angina between FFR-negative TCFA (Group B) and the group of patients with PCI treated FFR positive lesions (Group C).
18 months after procedure
The incidence of MACE (Cardiac death, MI, any clinically driven-revascularization or hospitalization due to unstable or progressive angina)
Time Frame: 18 months after procedure
deriving from non PCI treated lesions between TCFA hosting patients anywhere in the major coronary of stentable size vs. patients with no TCFA (this analysis will be run in the total pool of patients after treatment of all FFR positive lesions and does not take in account the angiographic severity of the lesions ie. the location of the TCFA can be elsewhere than the target lesion )
18 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: E Kedhi, MD PhD, Erasmus Academical Hospital Brussels

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Optical Coherence Tomography

3
Subscribe