Investigating Therapies for Freezing of Gait

Investigating Therapies for Freezing of Gait Targeting the Cognitive, Limbic, and Sensorimotor Domains

Freezing of gait (FOG) is arguably one of the most debilitating motor symptoms experienced by individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). FOG may be caused by an overload of cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor system activity in the basal ganglia. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor therapies in individuals with FOG. Participants in this study will undergo all three types of treatments in a randomized counterbalanced order. Each treatment will occur in 1 hour sessions, twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Freezing of gait (FOG) is arguably one of the most debilitating motor symptoms experienced by individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), and negatively impacts quality of life (Walton et al., 2015). Furthermore, advanced FOG does not respond well to treatments commonly used in Parkinson's disease (Nutt et al., 2011), therefore warranting the use of adjunct treatment options. The development of potential treatment strategies for FOG should focus on the underlying mechanism. The cross-talk model of FOG proposes that FOG may be caused by an overload of cognitive, limbic, and sensorimotor system activity in the basal ganglia, resulting in a depletion of dopaminergic resources, leading to FOG (Lewis & Barker, 2009). Hence, based on the cross-talk model, treatments targeting the cognitive, sensorimotor and limbic systems independently may lead to a reduction in FOG episodes. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of therapies targeting these domains in PD and healthy individuals, however, these have yet to be explored in FOG. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate cognitive, sensorimotor, and limbic therapies in individuals with FOG.

This study will employ a within-subjects design, in which participants will undergo all three treatments in a randomized counterbalanced order. Sessions for each type of treatment will occur for 1 hour, twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks. Participants will also undergo pre- and post-test assessments prior to and following each 4-week treatment period. The cognitive training will utilize the "Smartbrain Pro" computer software, which has previously demonstrated efficacy in individuals with Parkinson's disease (Paris et al., 2011). The sensorimotor training group will participate in proprioceptive training of the upper and lower limbs. This training will entail a target matching task, in which participants will produce active and self-defined movements while blindfolded (i.e. without visual feedback). The limbic training group will undergo cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) focusing solely on anxiety symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3C5
        • Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Either gender
  • Diagnosed with idiopathic PD by a Neurologist
  • Self-reported FOG with the use of UPDRS-II (Question 14)
  • Confirmation of present FOG by a movement disorder specialist
  • Able to walk 10 meters, unassisted
  • Able to understand English instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A neurological disease other than PD
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Clinically diagnosed with dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Training
Participants will independently complete cognitive exercises on the "Smartbrain Pro" computer software. These exercises aim to train different aspects of executive function. The difficulty level of each exercise will increase relative to each participant's progress. Sessions will last for one hour, occurring twice weekly for a period of 4 weeks.
Training the cognitive domain may be accomplished by training various cognitive and executive functions with guided practice focusing on specific skills (e.g. visuospatial processing, executive function, memory, language, and attention). Cognitive training has been demonstrated to be efficacious in several studies in individuals with PD. Given the potential cognitive contribution to FOG episodes, this type of therapy may alleviate FOG by potentially improving upon planning, set-shifting, and/or response inhibition.
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Participants will undergo one-on-one sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) working with a therapist to establish an individualized CBT plan which will focus on symptoms of anxiety. Participants will complete a total of eight one-hour sessions over 4 weeks.
CBT has been demonstrated to be effective in the remediation of anxiety in individuals with PD. This may be beneficial to individuals experiencing FOG, given the evidence that anxiety may provoke FOG. During periods of elevated anxiety (e.g. walking in a threatening environment), freezers will be able to more efficiently process this limbic load resulting in greater resources available for movement control.
Experimental: Proprioceptive Training
Participants will complete one-on-one sessions a target matching proprioceptive training protocol using their upper and lower limbs. For the upper limb target-reaching task, participants will be seated in front of a surface marked with ten targets. They will first visualize a specified target, then blindfolded and asked to reach towards that target with the blindfold on. The blindfold will then be removed allowing participants to view their performance relative to the target. This task will be repeated for the remaining targets on both sides and for both upper and lower limbs. Participants will complete a total of eight one-hour sessions over 4 weeks.
Currently, studies investigating proprioceptive training as a treatment in PD are limited. However, this type of training has potential by improving proprioceptive processing. It would be expected that due to this training, when sensorimotor processing is challenged during locomotion (e.g. by removing visual feedback and preventing compensation of proprioception deficits), freezers would experience less decrements to gait due to an enhanced ability to process sensorimotor demands.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of first treatment phase
Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of first treatment phase
Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of second treatment phase
Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of second treatment phase
Gait Assessment
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of third treatment phase
Participants will walk approximately 9.75 metres for 12 trials. Recording of kinematic data will be done with eight Optotrak® cameras (Northern Digital, NDI, Waterloo, Ontario). Spatiotemporal gait parameters will be analyzed from this assessment.
Change from Baseline at 4 weeks of third treatment phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroop Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Trail-making test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Stroop Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Trail-making test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Stroop Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
This test assesses inhibitory control and will be administered in a paper-based format.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
Trail-making test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
This will also be administered in a paper-based format. This test will assess visuospatial function and set-shifting ability.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
Passive Joint Angle Matching
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Passive Joint Angle Matching
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Passive Joint Angle Matching
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
This task will be assessed in order to evaluate proprioceptive functioning.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
Parkinson Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Parkinson Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Parkinson Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS), which is a self-report questionnaire used to assess anxiety levels, will be administered to participants. This tool has demonstrated good concurrent validity in individuals with PD against other existing anxiety scales (Leentjens et al., 2014).
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale Motor Subsection (UPDRS-III)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
A clinician administered assessment which evaluates individuals' motor symptom severity
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of first treatment phase
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of second treatment phase
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase
Participants will be asked to complete the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) questionnaire developed by Nieuwboer and colleagues (2009). This provides a self-reported measure of frequency and duration of FOG episodes. This tool has been validated and proven to be highly reliable in individuals with PD, as well as assessing treatment interventions for FOG.
Pre-intervention and Post-intervention at week 4 of third treatment phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Chow, BSc, Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Training

Subscribe