Development and Evaluation of a Home-Based Dual-Task Training Program to Improve Balance Performance for Older Adults

July 21, 2015 updated by: Patima Silsupadol, Chiang Mai University
The purpose of this study is to (1) develop and test the effectiveness of home-based interventions on dual-task performance in older adults; and (2) determine the generalizability of the four trainings (i.e. single-task motor training, single-task cognitive training, dual-task motor-cognitive training, and dual-task cognitive-cognitive trainings) to novel tasks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although, dual-task motor-cognitive training has proven to be more effective in improving dual-task balance performance than traditional single-task motor training, poor evidence of training-related transfer to a novel dual task has been shown. Additionally, another important impediment to the development of intervention to improve dual-task balance performance is that the previous studies have largely focused on training in a laboratory, or clinical setting, often with one-on-one supervision by a therapist or research assistant. Even though the home-based approach is more pragmatic, desirable, and encourages accessibility, no study has been done to examine the efficacy of home-based dual-task training.

Therefore, this study aims to address these gaps in the literature by conducting a home-based program designed to improve dual-task performance with a broader transfer-of-training effects in older adults. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups (i.e. single-task motor training, single-task cognitive training, dual-task motor-cognitive training, and dual-task cognitive-cognitive trainings).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chiang Mai
      • Sripoom, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to walk at least 10 meters without any assistive device
  • Having greater than 16/23 for illiterate persons, greater than 20/30 for primary education level persons, and greater than 23/30 for secondary education level persons on the Mini-Mental State Examination-Thai 2002 (MMSE-Thai2002)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe neurological problems that could account for possible imbalance such as cerebral vascular accident, Parkinson's disease, transient ischemic attacks, and neuropathy
  • Severe musculoskeletal problems that could impact gait such as severe osteoarthritis and active inflammatory joint disease
  • Severe cardiopulmonary problems such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Visual impairment that cannot be corrected by lenses
  • Severe auditory impairment such as deafness
  • Depression as scored ≥ 13 by Thai Geriatric Depression Scale (TGDS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single-task motor training group
The participants will receive only balance training which will progress from stance activities, to stance activities plus hand manipulation, then gait activities, and finally gait activities plus hand manipulation.
Balance activities, using a task-oriented approach, progress participants from body stability, to body stability plus hand manipulation, then body transport, and finally body transport plus hand manipulation.
Experimental: Single-task cognitive training group
The participants will receive cognitive training that will involve executive function, attention, and working memory.
Cognitive training involves executive function, attention, and working memory. Examples of cognitive training include finding the exit to a maze, calculation, visual-spatial skills, Sudoku, Stroop color-word task, word search, spot the differences, visual discrimination, and memory scanning skills.
Experimental: Dual-task motor-cognitive training group
The participants assigned to the dual-task motor-cognitive training group will receive the same exercises as single-task motor training while simultaneously performing secondary tasks as those in the single-task cognitive training group.
Balance activities, using a task-oriented approach, progress participants from body stability, to body stability plus hand manipulation, then body transport, and finally body transport plus hand manipulation.
Cognitive training involves executive function, attention, and working memory. Examples of cognitive training include finding the exit to a maze, calculation, visual-spatial skills, Sudoku, Stroop color-word task, word search, spot the differences, visual discrimination, and memory scanning skills.
Experimental: Dual-task cognitive-cognitive training group
The participants in the dual-task cognitive-cognitive trainings group will receive two cognitive tasks at the same time.
The Dual-task cognitive-cognitive training involves applying two cognitive tasks at the same time.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Center of Mass velocity and Base of Support distance
Time Frame: At baseline and after 4-week training
The Center of Mass velocity and Base of Support distance is referred as the direction of the center of mass velocity in relation to base of support. It is used to measure the control of dynamic balance throughout gait under single-task and dual-task conditions in order to examine training effect.
At baseline and after 4-week training
Spatio-temporal gait parameters
Time Frame: At baseline and after 4-week training
Spatio-temporal gait parameters is measured throughout gait under single-task and dual-task conditions in order to examine training effect.
At baseline and after 4-week training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • The graduate school, CMU

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elderly

Clinical Trials on Balance exercise

Subscribe