Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a randomized phase II study comparing microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

This trial will be the first prospective comparison of these modalities for the treatment of HCC and will provide critical information regarding which local ablative modality is most appropriate for which patients. This study will also provide important information regarding quality of life and liver function changes following these two different treatment modalities.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • The University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are eligible for this trial. HCC is defined as having at least one of the following:

    1. HCC diagnosed either on biopsy or based on standard imaging criteria on contrast enhanced CT or MRI (arterial enhancement with washout and pseudocapsule); or
    2. A discrete hepatic tumor(s) as defined by the Barcelona criteria10 for cirrhotic patients, >1 cm with arterial hypervascularity and venous or delayed phase washout on CT or MRI
    3. Presentation at multidisciplinary liver tumor board to assess eligibility for either SBRT or MWA
  • Patients must have 1-2 intrahepatic foci of HCC and may not be candidates for refuse hepatic resection. Patients who are on the organ wait list for (orthotopic liver transplantation) OLT will be considered for this trial as a "bridge" to transplant.
  • Patients with 1 focus of HCC will be eligible if their tumor is 3.5 cm or less in greatest diameter. Patients with 2 foci of HCC will be eligible if each lesion is 3.5 cm in diameter or less and the combined diameter of both lesions is 5 cm or less.
  • The foci of HCC must be in an anatomic location amendable to treatment by both MWA and SBRT.
  • The patient must have an ECOG performance status of ≤ 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status is an attempt to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. The score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0 is asymptomatic and 5 is death).
  • Patients must have recovered from the acute effects of prior liver-directed therapy (e.g., RT, RFA, MWA or TACE) and a minimum of 4 weeks must have passed since the last procedure and protocol therapy.
  • Patients must have:

    1. Platelets ≥ 50,000/mm3
    2. Child Pugh class A liver function or class B7 (Appendix II)
    3. INR (international normalized ratio (for anticoagulant monitoring)) < 1.5
  • The patient must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • The patient must be at least 18 years old
  • Patients must sign an IRB approved informed consent form for this purpose indicating that they are aware of the investigational aspects of the treatment and the potential risks. They also must be able to understand and the willing to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received prior abdominal radiation
  • Patients with 3 or more foci of HCC
  • Patients whose HCC involves the local vasculature, regional lymph nodes or distant metastatic sites
  • Patients with Child Pugh liver function worse than B7

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MWA
MWA will typically be administered in one ablation session during which time up to 2 tumors are treated.
MWA will typically be administered in one ablation session during which time up to 2 tumors are treated.
Experimental: SBRT
SBRT will be administered in five fractions of up to 10 Gy per fraction. SBRT will be administered 5-15 days per tumor.
SBRT will be administered in five fractions of up to 10 Gy per fraction. SBRT will be administered 5-15 days per tumor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to local tumor progression
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
The primary outcome of this trial is to prospectively determine local control rates in patients with HCC treated with MWA or SBRT. Freedom From Local Progression (FFLP) is defined as the time from randomization to local tumor progression. Tumors falling to group PD (progressive disease) would constitute local control failures. Progressive disease will be defined as at least a 20% increase in the LD (longest diameter) of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest LD recorded. Or at least a 20% increase in viable arterial enhancing disease, taking as reference the smallest LD of viable HCC since treatment started. Increases of less than 3 mm compared to the smallest LD recorded will be considered stable disease rather than PD.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary toxicity
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
The number of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher GI or hepatobiliary toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Incidence of liver function worsening
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
The number of patients experiencing a 2 point or more increase in Child-Pugh score and an increase in albumin-bilirubin score of at least 0.5.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Change in FACT- Hep questionnaire score
Time Frame: Questionnaires will be administered pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 1, 3 ,6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months post-treatment
The FACT-Hep questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hepatobiliary cancers. They are asked questions about their physical, social, emotional and functional well-being and asked to provide a score between 0 and 4 where 0 represents not at all and 4 represents very much.
Questionnaires will be administered pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 1, 3 ,6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months post-treatment
Overall survival time
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients who are alive at last follow-up will be censored on that date.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Progression free survival time
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the minimum time to death or any progression.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Metastasis free survival time
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Metastasis-free survival (MFS) is defined as the minimum time to development of metastases or death, whichever occurs first.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Incidence of intrahepatic failure
Time Frame: Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Intrahepatic failure will include progression of the treated lesion(s) as well as development of other new liver lesions.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dawn Owen, M.D., Ph.D., University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Microwave Ablation (MWA)

Subscribe