Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for Prevention of MTC HIV Transmission (SAIA-SCALE)

May 16, 2022 updated by: Kenneth Sherr, University of Washington

Scaling up the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission in Mozambique

Optimizing the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission cascade minimizes drop offs from one step to the next to maximize the benefits of antiretroviral therapy on maternal health and pediatric survival, growth, and development. This proposal scales-up a health systems intervention (the systems analysis and improvement approach - SAIA) that packages systems engineering methods (including cascade analysis, flow mapping, and continuous quality improvement) and was previously shown to be effective in improving the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission cascade. By spreading the SAIA through routine district management structures, and studying the implementation process, this study will build evidence on how to achieve rapid, sustainable and scalable improvements in services that can dramatically improve population health in resource limited countries.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Despite significant increases in global health investment and the availability of low-cost, efficacious interventions designed to prevent mother to child HIV transmission (PMTCT) in low and middle income countries with high HIV burden, the translation of these scientific advances into effective delivery strategies has been slow, uneven and incomplete. As a result, pediatric HIV infection remains largely uncontrolled. The introduction of the Option B+ strategy - where HIV-infected pregnant women rapidly initiate lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) independent of disease status - has the potential to dramatically reduce HIV transmission during pregnancy, birth and the breastfeeding period, and as a result, it has been scaled up throughout high HIV burden countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite these significant investments to scale-up Option B+, results have been poor, with high rates of loss to follow-up and low viral suppression, leading to continued HIV transmission to children and HIV-associated morbidity among mothers. A previous research project (the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach - or SAIA - cluster randomized trial) demonstrated that a package of systems engineering tools including cascade analysis, process mapping, and continuous quality improvement, was effective at improving flow through the PMTCT cascade across three sub-Saharan African countries. The overall goal of this application is to develop a model to deliver the SAIA intervention (SAIA-SCALE) that is led by district maternal and child health (MCH) supervisors (rather than research nurses), to serve as a foundation for national scale-up. We propose to implement the SAIA intervention in all districts in one province in Mozambique using MCH supervisors as disseminating agents, who will implement SAIA in subordinate health facilities. Using a three-year phased-in design, 12 districts will be randomly allocated into three implementation waves, and a mixed-methods evaluation will be used to assess the impact of the intervention. Our specific aims are to: Aim 1: Develop an effective district-based dissemination and implementation strategy for the SAIA intervention (SAIA-SCALE), using the RE-AIM model to evaluate the program's Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance; and Aim 2: Using activity based micro-costing and mathematical models of HIV transmission, estimate the budget and program impact from the payer perspective to scale-up the SAIA intervention compared to the standard of care. The results of this implementation research are expected to generate knowledge of global health significance, and by providing a real-world implementation model for the SAIA intervention and programmatically relevant information, is designed to lead to rapid policy translation for future scale-up in countries with high burden of HIV and weak PMTCT delivery systems.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manica
      • Chimoio, Manica, Mozambique
        • Manica Province

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria • Woman/infant pair attending pMTCT and linked pediatric HIV screening and treatment services at a public sector health facility

Exclusion Criteria

• None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SAIA (Systems Analysis & Improvement)
Intervention is a five-step package of industrial engineering methods known as SAIA (the systems analysis and improvement approach) delivered by district maternal and child health managers to subordinate health facilities that provide prevention of mother-to-child HIV services.
Five-step systems analysis and iterative improvement cycles applied by district maternal and child health supervisors to subordinate health facilities providing prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services at the facility level.
No Intervention: Control
Routine provision of prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services and routine support from district maternal and child health managers to subordinate facilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal retention in care, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: 6-months post ART initiation
Women retained in care (picked up their 6-month pharmacy refill within 15 days of scheduled pickup)
6-months post ART initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal viral load assessment, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: Within 1 month of delivery (birth)
Proportion of women on ART with viral load assessment
Within 1 month of delivery (birth)
Early Infant Diagnosis for HIV, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: within 8 weeks of birth
Proportion of HIV-exposed infants tested for HIV (PCR) within 8 weeks of birth
within 8 weeks of birth
Facility Delivery, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: At birth
Proportion of HIV-infected women enrolled in antenatal care with a facility delivery
At birth
Maternal ART Adherence, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months post ART initiation
Proportion of expected ART medicines picked up at study clinics
At 3 and 6 months post ART initiation
Viral Suppression, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: Within 1 months of delivery
Proportion of viral load samples with undetectable viral load (<20 copies/mL)
Within 1 months of delivery
Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission Rate, evaluated using clinic registry data
Time Frame: 6 months postpartum
Proportion of HIV-exposed infants testing positive for HIV
6 months postpartum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Sherr, PhD, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00000645
  • 1R01MH113435 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Patient- and aggregate facility-level data will be made available to users who request access to the data after a manuscript based on the primary study results is accepted for publication. User registration will be required in order to access or download files. As part of the registration process, users must agree to the conditions of use governing access to the public release data, including destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, and proper acknowledgement of the data resource. Registered users will receive user support, as well as information related to errors in the data, future releases, workshops, and publication lists. The information provided to users will not be used for commercial purposes, and will not be redistributed to third parties. Data from focus group discussions and key informant interviews will not be available because of human subjects protections constraints.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After a manuscript with primary study results is accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

User registration will be required in order to access or download files. As part of the registration process, users must agree to the conditions of use governing access to the public release data, including destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, and proper acknowledgement of the data resource. The information provided to users will not be used for commercial purposes, and will not be redistributed to third parties.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA)

3
Subscribe