Healthy Eating & Active Lifestyles for Diabetes: Feasibility Trial (HEAL-D)

March 9, 2021 updated by: King's College London

Healthy Eating & Active Lifestyle for Diabetes in UK African & Caribbean Communities: a Feasibility Trial With Process Evaluation

The HEAL-D feasibility trial is a randomised control study to determine the feasibility of conducting an effectiveness trial of the Healthy Eating & Active Lifestyles for Diabetes programme; a culturally-tailored diet and lifestyle intervention for the management of type 2 diabetes in African and Caribbean communities. In this feasibility study HEAL-D will be evaluated against usual care in 80 patients with type 2 diabetes. HEAL-D is a programme of culturally-tailored diabetes self-management education and support, delivered over 7 sessions. Key outcomes are the acceptability of the programme; and recruitment and retention of the research participants. The current study will also pilot the feasibility and acceptability to participants of measuring proposed primary and secondary outcomes including HbA1c, blood lipids (triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol), body weight, waist circumference, diabetes knowledge, diabetes and dietary competence, diabetes empowerment, perceived social support, quality of life, dietary intake, and physical activity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a feasibility trial with an embedded process evaluation of the HEAL-D intervention compared with usual care. The study will use a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design, with individual patients as the unit of randomisation, evaluating the HEAL-D programme against usual care. The RCT design has been chosen primarily to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting and retaining a control arm, as well as to define what constitutes 'usual care' and the variability within that. Patients with diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) will be recruited from General Practice surgeries in the London Boroughs of Lambeth and Southwark. In addition participants from the phase 1 co-design study will be invited to participate and self-referral methods will also be used, for example posters and advertisements in community locations. Patients will be eligible if they have a documented diagnosis of T2D and are of self-declared African or Caribbean ethnicity. Patients with complex therapeutic dietary needs may be ineligible if their individual needs are deemed incompatible with the aims of the intervention. Additionally patients who are unable to communicate in English will be ineligible.

A pragmatic sample size of 80 randomised patients, 40 in each arm, is anticipated to be sufficient to evaluate the programme, allowing for 20% drop-out/non-completion. As this is a feasibility trial it is not powered to detect statistically significant intervention effects, unless these estimated effects are extremely large. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and of trial methods, and to provide estimates of key parameters such as potential effect sizes, recruitment and retention rates of the trial and participation rates of the programme, so that the optimal design of a full-scale trial can be determined.

The HEAL-D intervention consists of 7 sessions; the programme will have a flexible schedule allowing participants to attend either fortnightly or monthly sessions. Each patient who participates will be in the study for approximately 7 months and will be asked to complete two assessment visits, one at baseline and one 6-8 months later, depending on the intensity of programme attendance. A range of potential primary and secondary outcome data will be collected including HbA1c, blood lipids (triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol), body weight, waist circumference, diabetes knowledge, diabetes and dietary competence, diabetes empowerment, perceived social support, quality of life, dietary intake, and physical activity. Participants may also participate in an interview or focus group as part of the study's process evaluation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • self-declared African, Caribbean or Black British ethnicity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complex dietetic needs e.g. advanced renal disease, making them unsuitable for general diet and lifestyle advice.
  • Complex educational needs making them unsuitable for general group education.
  • Unable to communicate in English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
HEAL-D diet and lifestyle education and behavioural change intervention, 7 sessions over 14 weeks.
HEAL-D is a 7 session programme of self-management education and behaviour change support for African and Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes. The sessions will support participants with behaviour change to adopt evidence-based diet and physical activity targets for type 2 diabetes. The intervention has been systematically developed with defined theory and behavioural change techniques mapped to this theory.
Active Comparator: Control
Usual care.
Participants receive usual care from their healthcare team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c
Time Frame: 6 months
glycosylated hemoglobin, mmol/mol
6 months
Waist circumference
Time Frame: 6 months
Waist circumference, cm
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body weight
Time Frame: 6 months
Body weight, kg
6 months
Total cholesterol
Time Frame: 6 months
Total cholesterol, mmol/l
6 months
LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: 6 months
LDL-cholesterol, mmol/l
6 months
HDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: 6 months
HDL-cholesterol, mmol/l
6 months
triglycerides
Time Frame: 6 months
triglycerides, mmol/l
6 months
Diabetes knowledge
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using the Short Diabetes Knowledge Instrument
6 months
Perceived Diabetes & Dietary Competence
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using the Perceived Diabetes & Dietary Competence (PDDC) questionnaire
6 months
Diabetes Empowerment
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form (DES-SF). It measures an individuals psychosocial self-efficacy with regard to their type 2 diabetes management. It uses a 5 point scale: Strongly Disagree; Somewhat disagree; Neutral; Somewhat Agree; Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree has a score of 1 through to strongly agree with a score of 5. The questionnaire is scored by averaging scores for all completed items. Total score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum score of 5. The higher the score the higher the self-efficacy/empowerment. There are no sub-scales in this measure.
6 months
Perceived social support
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (PSS). It measures the degree to which an individual feels socially supported. Scores are on a numerical scale from 1 to 7 with 1 being the lowest social support and 7 the highest. The scores are summed. Three subscales are reported: family; friends; and significant other. Each subscale scores a minimum 4 and maximum 28. The total score ranges from 12 to 84.Higher scores indicate higher the degree of perceived social support.
6 months
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months
The EuroQol Five Dimension Three Level (EQ-5D-3L) scale measures health status. Level 1: respondents choose one statement which best describes their health status (5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities,pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), coded as 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), or 3 (extreme problems). Numerals 1-3 have no arithmetic properties and should not be used as a cardinal score.The person's health status is defined by a 5-digit number, ranging from 11111 (no problems in all dimensions) to 33333 (extreme problems in all dimensions). There are potentially 243 different scores. Level 2 is the Visual Analogue Scale giving a score from 0 to 100, higher values indicating better health. The total score ranges from 0-1, it is calculated by applying a formula that essentially attaches values ('weights') to each of the levels in each dimension. The index can be calculated by deducting the appropriate weights from 1, the value for full health (i.e. state 11111).
6 months
Diabetes-specific Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using the Problem Areas In Diabetes-5 point scale (PAID-5). Each question has five possible answers with a value from 0 to 4, with 0 representing "no problem" and 4 "a serious problem". The scores for each of the 5 questions are added up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher degree of problems with diabetes.
6 months
Dietary carbohydrate intake
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured in grams/day from a 24 hour recall interview
6 months
Physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured as minutes of moderate intensity exercise per day using the Motion Watch accelerometer
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Louise M Goff, PhD, King's College London
  • Principal Investigator: Barbara McGowan, PhD, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on HEAL-D

Subscribe