Integration of Cancer Health Activities Into African American Churches

October 31, 2022 updated by: University of Maryland, College Park
The proposed project will compare two ways to apply a known-effective cancer educational strategy through African American churches: 1) a standard method vs. 2) a new method in which the churches integrate the strategy into their organizational structure and practice at multiple levels. It will be determined whether this "integrated approach" results in more effective and sustained cancer education and screening activities at both the church and individual levels over time. This project will make important contributions to research in evidence-based medicine and sustainability. In a climate of limited resources, identifying sustainable and effective ways to increase cancer awareness and screening in African American men and women is more important than ever.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This population-based application responds to the American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant, Priority Program in Cancer Control. Recent years have seen a growing research interest in learning how to get known-effective health education strategies to reach more people who could benefit from them. An important part of this growing movement is a focus on sustained impact, or continued program benefit after the funding period is over. It is believed that the best way to achieve this sustained impact is through integrating the program into the host community at multiple levels. This innovative strategy has not been systematically tested in community-based settings, where the most vulnerable people can be reached. Since churches have a historical and ever-growing role in health promotion particularly among African Americans, they are an ideal place to reach this group for cancer education. The proposed project will compare two ways to apply a known-effective cancer educational strategy through African American churches: 1) a standard method vs. 2) a new method in which the churches integrate the strategy into their organizational structure and practice at multiple levels. It will be determined whether this "integrated approach" results in more effective and sustained cancer education and screening activities at both the church and individual levels over time. The educational strategy is one that has been used successfully in previous work: Project Health through Early Awareness and Learning (HEAL). Project HEAL is a series of three cancer early detection workshops (breast, prostate, colorectal) delivered through trained and certified lay peer community health advisors in African American churches. 14 churches will be randomly chosen to conduct either the standard Project HEAL program or an integrated Project HEAL strategy where the churches build the program into their organization in multiple ways (e.g., allocating volunteer or paid staff, space, or funds; policy change; ministry development). The project will be conducted in three phases: 1) refining the integrated approach with community and stakeholder feedback; 2) pilot testing the integrated approach in 2 churches; and 3) conducting the study to comparatively evaluate the standard vs. the integrated approaches in 14 churches. A scientifically rigorous evaluation plan will be used to look at outcomes at both the individual and the church level. This project will make important contributions to research in evidence-based medicine and sustainability. In a climate of limited resources, identifying sustainable and effective ways to increase cancer awareness and screening in African American men and women is more important than ever.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

446

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • College Park, Maryland, United States, 20742
        • University of Maryland School of Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advisory Panel members: adults ages 21+
  • Pastors, representing each of the 14 churches enrolled in the project: active pastor of churches enrolled in the study
  • Community Health Advisors
  • Self-identified African American
  • Adults ages 21+
  • Regularly attend church services
  • Able to complete Project HEAL training
  • Able to recruit 40+ participants for a breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer educational workshop
  • Able to lead the breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer workshops
  • Workshop Participants
  • Self-identified African American
  • Adults ages 21+
  • Have no history of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Workshop Participants: Men and women who have had breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Integrated Approach
In this approach, rather than developing a separate health ministry, cancer activities could be integrated throughout existing church ministries (e.g. men's, women's, seniors).
In this approach, rather than developing a separate health ministry, cancer activities could be integrated throughout existing church ministries (e.g. men's, women's, seniors).
Active Comparator: Standard Comparison
Standard group churches will not be asked to, or provided special encouragement to technical assistance with, institutionalizing health promotion activities in their churches.
Standard group churches will not be asked to, or provided special encouragement to technical assistance with, institutionalizing health promotion activities in their churches.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Integration of health-relation practices assessed via church survey
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 and 24 months
Intervention impact on institutionalization at 12 and 24 months
Change from baseline to 12 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach: Number of participants from priority population engaged in intervention as assessed by enrollment logs
Time Frame: Up to 4 months
Participants from priority population engaged in intervention
Up to 4 months
Efficacy: Increased knowledge of cancer as assessment by participant surveys
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Cancer-related knowledge
Up to 12 months
Efficacy: Increased self-report of cancer screening as assessment by participant surveys
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Self-reported cancer screening
Up to 12 months
Adoption
Time Frame: At recruitment/enrollment
Cooperation rate of churches
At recruitment/enrollment
Implementation: Extent to which intervention is implemented as intended as assessed by a fidelity checklist completed by staff
Time Frame: Up to 4 months
Adherence to intervention protocol
Up to 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Project HEAL 2.0

3
Subscribe