Comparison of an Exoskeleten With an End-effector for Assisted Gait Training in Spinal Cord Injury

May 14, 2020 updated by: AYLİN SARI, Erenköy Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital

Comparison of Exoskeleten Assisted Gait Training With End-effector Assisted Gait Training in Spinal Cord Injury

Aim is to compare exoskeleton assisted gait training with end-effector assisted gait training in Spinal Cord Rehabilitation

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It was planned to evaluate patients aged between 18 and 80 years who will admit to the robotic rehabilitation program due to spinal cord injury. Patients will divide into three groups as Exoskeleton, End-effector and conventional therapy. Exoskeleton and End-effector group will receive robotic therapy 4 days a week besides conventional treatment for 6 weeks. All groups will be evaluated at the start and end of the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • In The USA Or Canada, Please Select...
      • Istanbul, In The USA Or Canada, Please Select..., Turkey, 3440

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical diagnosis of spinal cord injury Applying to the hospital for a rehabilitation program

Exclusion Criteria:

Inadequate body weight (obesity) Severe contractures Bone instability ( nonstable spinal cord fracture, and severe osteoporosis) Circulation problems Cardiac nonconformity Open wounds on the lower extremities or in the body where they will come into contact with the orthosis Uncoordinated, psychotic or aggressive patients Serious cognitive disorders Long-term infusion therapy Hip, knee, ankle arthrodesis Epilepsy Disproportionate limb or vertebrae, such as bone cartilage dysplasia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: exoskeleton
We will use exoskeleton type robot assisted gait training for spinal cord injury rehabilitation
we use two types of robot assisted gait training and we will compare two groups.
Active Comparator: end-effector
We will use end-effector type robot assisted gait training for spinal cord injury rehabilitation
we use two types of robot assisted gait training and we will compare two groups.
Placebo Comparator: conventional physiotherapy
we use two types of robot assisted gait training and we will compare two groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FAC
Time Frame: Change from baseline FAC class to 6th week of therapy
functional ambulational classification scale
Change from baseline FAC class to 6th week of therapy
6MWT
Time Frame: Change from baseline 6MWT class to 6th week of therapy
6 minute walking test
Change from baseline 6MWT class to 6th week of therapy
10MWT
Time Frame: Change from baseline 10MWT class to 6th week of therapy
10 meter walking test
Change from baseline 10MWT class to 6th week of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASIA
Time Frame: Change Of ASIA scale from the beginnig to the 6th week of the therapy
ASIA impairment scale
Change Of ASIA scale from the beginnig to the 6th week of the therapy
SCIM
Time Frame: Change Of SCIM from the beginnig to the 6th week of the therapy
Spinal cord independence measure
Change Of SCIM from the beginnig to the 6th week of the therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: unsal SARI, Dr.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 15, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on robot assisted gait training

3
Subscribe