Decreasing Hospital Admissions From the ED for AAFF (RAFF-3)

June 18, 2021 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Decreasing Hospital Admissions From the Emergency Department for Acute Atrial Fibrillation

Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter (AAFF) is characterized by rapid heart rates with onset less than seven days. It's the most common type of palpitation treated in the Emergency Department (ED). Some Canadian ED's will discharge 95% of AAFF patients whereas others admit up to 40%. With hospital and ED crowding, discharge is the most optimal, effective and safe strategy. Our aim is to improve the care and reduce the length of stay (LOS) of ED AAFF patients, while decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations. First, the investigators must understand the local barriers. In the previous study, the investigators conducted interviews of emergency physicians, cardiologists and AAFF patients. In Project 1b, the investigators created the CAEP ED AAFF Guidelines Checklist to assist physicians to manage AAFF more efficiently and safely. The Guidelines are comprised of two algorithms and four sets of checklists for ED assessment and management. They have been endorsed by CAEP and are published in CJEM.

The investigators are now planning Project 2 in which the investigators will conduct a cluster [group] randomized trial at 11 Canadian EDs and enroll 1,300 patients over thirteen months. The investigators are not randomizing individual patients or doctors; instead the investigators are randomizing the start date of individual hospitals. Our goal is to introduce the new Guidelines into these hospitals to improve the care of AAFF patients. The investigators hope to improve AAFF management, leading to a significant decrease in hospital admissions and ED LOS. Central to our plans will be engagement of our two patient partners. Our behaviorally optimized intervention will be developed using state-of-the-art implementation science approaches informed by the results of Project 1a. The investigators will also undertake within-project and end-of-project knowledge translation and implementation (KTI) strategies to facilitate scale up and roll out of our program to ED departments in small, medium, and large hospitals across Canada (future Project 3). Ultimately the investigators expect to improve ED practices and decrease AAFF admissions and LOS, without increasing visits.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

846

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Brunswick
      • Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
        • Dr. Georges-L. - Dumont University Hospital
    • Nova Scotia
      • Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
        • Dartmouth General Hospital
    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • St. Joseph's Health Center
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • McGill University Health Centre
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Hopital Du Sacre-Coeur
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Hopital Charles-LeMoyne
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada
        • Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada
        • Hotel-Dieu De Levis
    • Saskatchewan
      • Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
        • Regina General Hospital
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
        • Royal University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

All eligible patients seen in the participating EDs during the study period will be included in the trial regardless of how they are managed.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stable patients presenting with an episode of acute atrial fibrillation or flutter (AAFF) of at least 3 hours duration, where symptoms require ED management by rhythm or rate control.
  • patients with a history of prior episodes of AAFF, or those with previous presentations during the study periods.

Exclusion Criteria: We will exclude patients who have any of the reasons listed below.

  • have permanent (chronic) AF
  • are deemed unstable and require immediate cardioversion: i) systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg; ii) rapid ventricular pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome); iii) acute coronary syndrome - ongoing severe chest pain and marked ST depression (>2mm) on ECG despite therapy; or iv) pulmonary edema - severe dyspnea requiring immediate IV diuretic, nitrates, or BIPAP;
  • the primary presentation was for another condition rather than arrhythmia
  • convert spontaneously to sinus rhythm prior to receiving physician-initiated therapy; or
  • die while in the ED from non-AAFF related causes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Local implementation of AAFF guidelines
The study intervention will support local implementation of the CAEP AAFF Guidelines during the intervention periods of the trial. The investigators will identify behaviour change techniques and organization/system level strategies that could likely address identified barriers or enhance enablers.

The Investigators also plan the following activities to encourage adherence to the guidelines, with an ultimate goal of rhythm or rate control and discharge home for most patients.

  1. Selection of one or more local physician champions from both the ED as well as the cardiology group;
  2. Review and discussion of the goals of the study, as well as perceived barriers and enablers, by the ED and cardiology physician groups;
  3. Formal introduction of the CAEP AAFF Guidelines to the ED physicians and residents by means of presentations at rounds and staff meetings, emails, online video, and web-based resources;
  4. Development of local action plan addressing local barriers to implementation;
  5. Provision of the free Smartphone App to be developed for the guidelines;
  6. Regular reminders provided by the local research staff;
  7. Audit and feedback charts of site compliance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of stay in ED in minutes
Time Frame: a 100 minute reduction in ED length of stay (or a relative reduction of approximately 25%)
Length of stay in ED in min. from time of arrival to time of discharge or admission.
a 100 minute reduction in ED length of stay (or a relative reduction of approximately 25%)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of rhythm control in the ED
Time Frame: 13 months
attempts at chemical or electrical cardioversion, as well as the success of these attempts (we believe these attempts facilitate ED discharge); compliance with the AAFF Guidelines will be assessed on criteria to be determined a priori by the investigators;
13 months
Use of rate control and the final heart rate at disposition
Time Frame: 13 months
compliance with the AAFF Guidelines will be assessed on criteria to be determined a priori by the investigators;
13 months
Appropriate prescription of anticoagulants on discharge
Time Frame: 1 day
anticoagulation prescription in compliance with the AAFF Guidelines
1 day
Adverse events
Time Frame: 30 days from discharge from the ED
measuring adverse events within 30 days of discharge from the emergency department
30 days from discharge from the ED
Return ED visits and admission
Time Frame: 30 days
for AAFF or related cardiovascular problems (stroke, CHF, AAFF, ACS or death), in the subsequent 30 days via a Health record reivew
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20180367-01T

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe