The Difference in Preoperative Evaluation That is Given by a Senior Physician, a Specialist, and a Computer Program (ACS)

August 9, 2018 updated by: Ronen Ohad, Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya

Differences in Surgical Risk Evaluation by Surgical Risk Calculator, Residents and Senior Anesthesiologists

There is an increasing need and interest in being able to empirically estimate customized, patient-specific risks for virtually all surgical operations in a user-friendly format.

The ACS (American College of Surgeons) surgical risk calculator is a decision-support tool based on reliable multi institutional clinical data, which can be used to estimate the risks of most operations.1 The aim of this study is to compare the assessment provided by the The ACS Surgical Risk Calculator with the assessment provided by a senior and a resident anesthesiologist, and by that comparison to establish the need for the ACS calculator

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Understanding the risks of surgery is clearly important for both patients and surgeons in the shared decision making process. Informed consent requires that patients have a thorough understanding of the potential risks of surgery. Moreover, clinicians and patients also need information regarding surgical risks in order to make decisions on the type of operation or whether surgery should be performed at all.

Therefore, there is a need to discuss the risks derived empirically with a specific patient before any action to guide both surgical decision-making and informed consent.

However, predicting postoperative risks and identifying patients at a higher risk of adverse events have traditionally been based on individual surgeon experience and augmented by published rates in the literature, either from single institution studies or clinical trials. Unfortunately, these estimates are typically not specific to an individual Patient's risk factors. The ACS (American College of Surgeons) Surgical Risk Calculator estimates the chance of an unfavorable outcome (such as a complication or death) after surgery. The risk is estimated based upon information the patient gives to the healthcare provider about prior health history. The estimates are calculated using data from a large number of patients who had a surgical procedure similar to the one the patient may have.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are scheduled for any surgical procedure will be recruited for the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients candidates for surgery
  • Signed informed consent by patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity for each patient
Time Frame: Each patient is assessed within a week by both physicians and the ACS web-based computer. The trial is scheduled for a whole year.
Anesthesiologists give their estimation of overall mortality that is compared to that given by the ACS web-based calculator
Each patient is assessed within a week by both physicians and the ACS web-based computer. The trial is scheduled for a whole year.
Morbidity for each patient
Time Frame: Each patient is assessed within a week by both physicians and the ACS web-based computer. The trial is scheduled for a whole year.
Anesthesiologists give their estimation of different morbidities and that is compared to that given by the ACS web-based calculator
Each patient is assessed within a week by both physicians and the ACS web-based computer. The trial is scheduled for a whole year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NHR-14-OR-0094

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

there is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe