Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students

August 27, 2018 updated by: Dr. Boris Zevin, Queen's University

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-Based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Faculty-Led, Peer Tutor-Led, and Computer Augmented Methods of Teaching

Evidence favours teaching procedural skills to medical students using a proficiency-based rather than time-based approach. Basic suturing skills can be taught through faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and computer augmented approaches. One method has yet to be identified as superior in terms of educational outcomes, resource utilization, and participant perspectives.

Pre-clerkship medical students were randomized to: faculty, peer tutor, or computer augmented learning. Participants practiced suturing through their randomized method until they reached targeted proficiency defined using hand motion analysis (HMA). Proficiency was defined as a score of the average plus a standard deviation of five surgeons' HMA for two of three consecutive sutures using appropriate technique.

The primary outcome was the number of stitches placed to achieve proficiency. The secondary outcomes were the number of sutures used, time, and costs incurred. Learning curves were constructed. Participants' perceptions were assessed using a follow-up survey.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6
        • Queen's Unviersity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Second year, pre-clerkship medical students

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Faculty-led
Students will train to proficiency (defined by hand motion analysis) on simple interrupted sutures with an instrument tie via one of three different methods: faculty-led, peer tutor-led, or computer augmented self-directed learning.
Experimental: Peer tutor-led
Students will train to proficiency (defined by hand motion analysis) on simple interrupted sutures with an instrument tie via one of three different methods: faculty-led, peer tutor-led, or computer augmented self-directed learning.
Experimental: Computer augmented self-directed learning
Students will train to proficiency (defined by hand motion analysis) on simple interrupted sutures with an instrument tie via one of three different methods: faculty-led, peer tutor-led, or computer augmented self-directed learning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of stitched laid to reach proficiency
Time Frame: Five days
Five days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of sutures used to reach proficiency
Time Frame: Five days
Five days
Minutes to reach proficiency
Time Frame: Five days
Five days
Individual costs to reach proficiency
Time Frame: Five days
Five days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Learning curves
Time Frame: Five days
Five days
Student preferences
Time Frame: Five days
Five days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SURG-422-18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Education, Medical

3
Subscribe